Please stop pretending you are just accidentally browsing random search engines and not stalking down my every thread. I would never invite you to spam your sig whilst pretending to make worthwhile comment.
You really go searching for your own username in search engines with the exact same mispelling as mine.... sounds like a usual excuses I hear in meta.
This was clearly sarcasm.
Are you seriously telling me he was aiming quoting something you didnt go near mentioning? ... get real. Nobody could accept that explanation because you never said anything like that.
The use of the quotation marks was clearly
"scare quotes", and not as a direct quote of something anybody said.
This is diabolical and worse that 300lbs of DT abuse
This was clearly a joke.
So people can get red trust for saying lemon without it being an abuse of the trust system?
This was clearly a metaphor.
I think part of the problem here is that cryptohunter, being (I presume) a non-native English speaker, is literally taking everything, well, literally. When you re-read everything with this mindset, it is easier to see how this misunderstanding arose and escalated. Perhaps with this in mind, we can all come to an agreeable solution. Having said that cryptohunter, you are not helping yourself by continuing to rage at people who are trying to help you (e.g. suchmoon and The Pharmacist).
I want him to run me through his entire though process during that exchange starting with me saying marlboroza is misquoting me.
1 - marlboroza made a post
here containing two direct quotes from you, as well as a couple of
"scare quotes".
2 - You then stated he was:
pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.
3 - Everyone assumed you were talking about the actual quotes, and so suchmoon made a video showing that you click on the quotes and it will bring you directly to the posts where you said the quoted text.
4 - A couple of posts later, you elaborated that it was the "scare quotes" you were objecting to, which no one ever claimed were said by you (or anybody else for that matter).
5 - The confusion was cleared up.
I want everyone to examine this carefully and closely .... this is now what i see happened here and it is clear.....
I appreciate your actually trying to help get a sensible conclusion.. also you can ask salty himself but i think he is serious when he says if people choose to give you neg trust for liking a lemon that is not abuse. This is not a metaphor he straight up means that. Ask him and see what he says about this lemon example he gave. He straight up means that is not abuse of DT trust or the trust system.
Anyway to explore this nonsense deeper step by step....
Walk through the observable events step by step starting with malboroza showing up...and
what exactly he quotes of mine and
what he replies to those quotes specifically and
end with the video and the highlighted text.Step 1
malboroza comes after reading the thread where i said
a. lauda should get more red tags
b. tp is asskissing up to lauda.
C. Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....weeeee down the snakes and ladders..
malboroza now sees all of this together... and says this
Quote from: cryptohunter on 17-12-2018, 22:51:37
I accidentally mistype my forum nick on one strange unknown search engine which I can't remember which one it was and I was pointed to this post:
Quote from: cryptohunter on 18-12-2018, 17:14:42
Can't wait for suchmoon and malborozo to have theirs done too....
...so thank you for inviting me to this valuable and sensible discussion which moved from "cryptohunter's problem with the top 200 merit receivers" to "tag Lauda!" and "Lauda stuck it in TP's ass "
--------------------------------------------------
So that is all he said.... now think about that he is replying specifically to where i say i can't wait for suchmoon and malboroza have theirs done too weee snakes and ladders .... so why is he responding to exactly that comment with ass sex comments??? I mean why to that specific sentence. He is assuming I am saying i can;t wait for them to be done with ass sex too with laudas snake or whatever he is obviously like fox pup always going on about homo erotica they like to talk about I mean I am not against what they want to talk about or do but don't quote me as saying this stuff i never said. I mean there is no other explanation for this at all to reply to that exact sentence of mine with that reply he made. that actually was in reference to them getting their merits put through the minus top 10 filter like the others had just gone through. So that comment was nothing to do ass or lauda snakes in anyway as i clearly intended it.
He has made some false connection about it all based on Tp ass"something" lauda and can't wait for suchmoon and malboroza to get theirs done too snakes and ..... There is no other viable reason why he would reply to that specific sentence out of hundred i made with that specific remark about The Pharmacist getting it from lauda in his ass. Marborozas WORDS not mine. I never even mentioned anything sexually explicit at all.
NEXT...
Now so when I reply....with this
@suchmoon
nothing of substance
@malborozo
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all.
I mean there is nothing else that malboroza said that I can be referring to as disturbing fantasies in his post.NEXT
such moon quotes exactly thisQuote from: cryptohunter on Today at 00:32:39
Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all. You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that?He is making the same assumption. He knows I can only be refering to malborozas ass sex reference there is nothing else disturbing fantasies could relate to in his post. What else in that post is a disturbing fantasy?? nothing there at all that is obviously what I meant and he knows this. Else tell me what else is a disturbing fantasy in that post?? does he have a disturbing fantasy at red tagging lauda? no besides I already clearly did say that so not that. There is nothing else that could qualify for a disturbing fantasy in that post malboroza made at all.
NEXT
I tell such moon to bring evidence I had orginally said that ... obviously about lauda banging Tp in the ass since that is all I could mean by a disturbing fantasyNEXT
The video such moon creates?
Now this is so weird.
He is meant to be substantiating this dont forget since he precisely quotes it
that i had been Describing disturbing fantasies of his own and pretending to quote me when I never said that at all ,,,,this is what he quotes specifically. so he knows I am refuting i said about tp and lauda ass sex
You do realize that one can click on the quote and go to the post where you actually said that (he thinks he will prove by showing i said i want it to happen to suchmoon and malboroza and thinking about TP and ass "something was it kissing or ass banging" he is confused? says such moon.... then brings his proof. Well he thinks it is proof but proof of what in this specific context??
the thing he highlights in the video is again I cant wait for suchmoon and malboroza to get theirs done ....weeeee snakes and ladderswhy is he quoting that line to prove I did say what malboroza misquoted about tp and that disturbing fantasy of tp/laudas ass bangingFollow it is quite clear if if you read their precise quotes and precise replies "they got the wrong end of the stick so to speak " lolThey remembered me saying tp ass "something" lauda... they see me saying cant wait to such moon and malboroza get theirs done too weeee snakes and ladders ...and make a false connection simple as that. Then try to turn this on me when I said i never even said this and I was being misquoted. I would not go so explicit as full assfucking The pharmacist at all from lauda. I feel jokes are okay but kids can read this board so not too explicit but i mean they said it all now so kids dont read this thread... He specifically mentions lauda fucking the pharmacist in his ass and quotes it right next to my other quote. Now they try to say they were not quoting me but perhaps suchmoon or nobody.
Can;t wait for such moon and malboroza to get theirs done too.....weeeee snakes and ladders as proof i did say something like that.
Anyone deeply analysing it can see no other reason for suchmoons video highlighting of that line? what else does it show relating to malborozas disturbing fantasies with lauda and the pharmacist.
Suchmoon come here and explain this at once. I want to hear your entire thought process and every reply to every single thing you quoted and specifically replied to those quotes.. and you malboroza.
This invented bullshit story they thought I mean something else bring it and explain the video and the replies to specific quotes you posted. What else is there that I could have realistically meant? the entire thing is more time travel and i googled my name spelled wrong on a search engine i cant remember. This kind of nonsense is good for banter but this is not for red trust when you are DT.
Any person working through this slowly and picking what they are quoting of mine precisely and what they are replying to those quotes is quite straight forward.
I mean of course this is all nonsense from them. But even imagine (it is not real) that I did by mistake say to malboroza I did not say something i really did. He should just quote this and prove me wrong not give me red trust. I mean that is if there was a mistake and it was my fault for making it by some error then you do not get red trust for saying you did not say something you did by a mistake???
I want my trust restored to normal Or an alternative and sensible explanation with details on every single aspect.
@Lauda present evidence for these lies or stfu i see neg trust mania on yours from old members who can see through your devious ways.
Bring these lies to light right now. Bring these attacks that are un called for on people that were just minding their own business and I dont mean people attacking me first.
another one with nothing to bring forth. Now bring the lies, and bring the attacks that were not deserving having attacked me first.
Hurry up.
I am having some very interesting conversations with ppl who gave you negative trust already. Don't keep bugging me with your unsubstantiated nonsense because I will divert a lot of time to a new thread on you. Perhaps you have been tarnished beyond what you deserve but I will help you get redemption if you deserve it .... then again if it is worse than we though....oh dear. I suspect the latter but I am not essentially interested in you right now since you have already fallen from grace. So don't make me become more interested.
That is not a threat at all that is simply an offer of publicaly reaching a fair assessment of yourself If you have no big skeletons then nothing to worry about. Maybe you will benefit. perhaps not.
Or vanish and I may just forget about wasting my time on you for now.
Am I attacking you or are you coming to comment on my threads and attacking me with unsubstantiated claims when I could not give a shit where you are or what you doing. So please vanish back to the swamp.
@ eddie13 - thanks
the entire thing is insane and needs to reach all parts of this board to let people know what is happening with this DT trust nonsense being given out on a whim for provable errors on the DT part.. This is 2 times now I have seen it recently .... provably given on the basis of mistake of the DT.
If this thread is deleted more proof of them hiding the fact they are setting me up with
1. an unbelievable story
2. even if anyone could believe their crazy story from start to finish. You do not get red trust for saying you are misquoting me on the thread they are meant to be doing it. They simply prove they are not.
3. They have motive because I mentioned that trust is subjective and is cycled amongst a few at the top it just so happens Malboroza was shown by locye to be the most narrowly cycled of all. Not my fault this is data and I never even requested top 50. Also i never pointed it out before now although I was at times itching to point it out when he kept sniping at me in my threads and then not substantiating of qualifying his snipes. I still did not mention he was number 1 of all the intensely cycled merits so far.
Now remove my red trust or modify suchmoons events because they are not beleivable and he made a mistake and so did you.
Stop hiding behind you DT trust and present yourself with your side.
Also very worth noting
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48751290suchmoon claims malboroza is not red trusting for any merit nonsense.
look at the bottom of the post before I get red trust.... he is still clearly very annoyed about this entire trust thing with him getting number 1 score on the top 50 removal
he tells me to tell theymos he must remove his 50 point score. I actually would have never spoken to malboroza if he had not come for me about merit on the threads.... .also even though previously i noted to myself he was the one who was reduced the most from the top 50 removal I did not mention it to him at all even after he kept sniping me in every thread and tracking me down. Even here tracking me and saying it was some search engine incorrect name crap. Even then. Now after getting red trust I finally have to demonstrate why the trust thing is annoying him so much. Although on several occasions i have praised him for things he never tries ever to say one nice thing back.
Merit to some people is a very touchy subject it seems. Don;t dare pull stats they don;t like pulling over and over themselves because it it does not prove how popular or recognised or how good of a poster they are they don;t like those things being questioned and even logically denied.
Sorry but it is true. Just don't worry about it. If you want to believe 2500 merits make you the best poster you can. The fact it is probably not true (i mean it could be) should not stand in your way if you dont want it to.