Cryptoplay.io - Casino and Sportsbook | Race and Rise to Riches - $2M | VIP ⚽️🎰 - page 2.

letteredhub

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 271

Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS

Quote from: panjul07 on October 13, 2023, 09:08:25 AM

Quote from: OcTradism on October 13, 2023, 03:28:56 AM

Signature campaigns can not bring effect if only running in one or a few weeks. It needs to be a long run campaign to have effect but it is challenging for a new casino like any new business. They can have a budget for marketing but they only can run sustainable marketing if budget for it not only comes from the team pocket but also from profit of their business. When their business gets profit, they can use part of profit for marketing and I am sure it is how big casinos do.

They get effects from their long run campaigns and they reuse business profit for their campaign prolongs.

Long term campaign is also not a guarantee that it will bring good effect to the casinos, why? Simply because the main product/services/offers provided by the casino is the main important thing to attract gamblers to come-deposit-play-stay.
Signature campaign is just an advertisement tool to make people aware about the existence of the product, but real customers will decide to use it or not after looking deeper at the product.
It means that advertisement can be useless if the product is not attractive enough to gain the interest from customers.

The two goes together mate, without a sustainable wider reach advertisement the existence of a product or service will not be recognize or known by a good number of it's targeted prospect and even with how A-1 the product or service they offer might be it can't grow profit without a sustainable complimented advert. And one thing about advertisement is that it acts as a reminder to her users and prospects that a certain company producing certain product/service is standing tall and making giant strides in the market. Without it customers base is likely to drop
because they may feel the company is no more invoke so they sort for another that's in invoke and making the news at the time, furthermore new customers hard to come by.
It can be challenging for a new company that's just trying to illuminate it's brand in a market where others are already dominant and that is the first major challenge of a new unpopular brand. So it's understandable that it's not easy.

so98nn

hero member

Activity: 2114

Merit: 603

I am seeing many comments in the thread that are mixed in nature however I would like to welcome the casino as first Timer. I am seeing an amazing project to be honest. I mean the design is superb and anyone can fall for this casino in blink of an eye. I am wondering why I haven’t seen this casino ANN already. The fact that you guys have your own 21 in house slots makes me wonder how did you do it? I have seen 2 or max 3 casinos who were able to make their own slot games. Having own slots make it helpful to understand how much casino is investing in their own branding. I am not sure when I will start playing on this platform but it definitely is I want it kinda platform. Good luck guys.

cwil

sr. member

Activity: 285

Merit: 262

I'm glad you're looking in to this, though I wish my original post had been answered so that maybe the flag and negative trust could have been avoided. In a PM, you asked for additional information. I don't think there is much else that I can provide other than what is in this thread. I hope you are able to find and correct this problem, and I expect that correcting this problem will include paying out all won bets incorrectly reported as lost.

AndriesW.

copper member

Activity: 27

Merit: 5

Quote from: cwil on October 14, 2023, 03:13:18 AM

Quote from: cwil on October 12, 2023, 06:18:14 PM

Would you mind explaining the results of the following bets?

869601854
869602054
869602352
869602473

The result of bet id 869601854 is as follows:

Code:

{
"id": 869601854,
"game": "Roulette (EU)",
"slot_name": null,
"slug": "roulette-eu",
"slot_slug": null,
"slot": 0,
"currency": "BTC",
"options": {
"20": "10.000",
"66": "10.000",
"67": "10.000",
"89": "10.000",
"101": "10.000",
"124": "10.000",
"125": "10.000",
"135": "10.000",
"136": "10.000"
},
"data": [
26,
[]
],
"payout": "0.00",
"amount": "0.003362466992",
"profit": "-0.003362466992",
"hide_bets": 0,
"username": "Acer64",
"xp": "900.00000000",
"datetime": "12 Oct 2023 22:18:22",
"avatar": "8",
"avatar_bg": "f34135",
"avatar_builder": 1,
"server_seed": "2ca25f3eeb0cce84690cbad69c61a991101135d8d795e3821cfda55251bb8e1d",
"client_seed": "d64b8399a89512",
"reveal": 1,
"nonce": 2,
"server_seed_hash": "e4fb55e2493e8cca556690c91bd22d1050a83dd6c50c328fb111d5ceeb9efd5f"
}

The first value of the data array is 26, and this is the value recorded as having been the result of this Roulette game.

At https://cryptoplay.io/help/fairness, the following code is available to check your provably fair implementation:

Code:

$seed = hash_hmac('sha512', 'my server seed', 'my client seed'.':'.'my nonce');
$seed = hexdec(substr($seed,0,10));
$roulette_number = $seed % 37;

return $roulette_number;

I wrote the following Node.js adpation of the PHP code:

Code:

const crypto = require('crypto');
const hex = crypto.createHmac('sha512', 'd64b8399a89512:2').update('2ca25f3eeb0cce84690cbad69c61a991101135d8d795e3821cfda55251bb8e1d').digest('hex').substring(0, 10);
const res = parseInt(hex, 16) % 37;
console.log(res);

This code indicates the result of the game should have been 21, which would have been a winning result for this particular game.

The results of the next bet in this series, bet id 869601961, follows:

Code:

{
"id": 869601961,
"game": "Roulette (EU)",
"slot_name": null,
"slug": "roulette-eu",
"slot_slug": null,
"slot": 0,
"currency": "BTC",
"options": {
"20": "10.000",
"66": "10.000",
"67": "10.000",
"89": "10.000",
"101": "10.000",
"124": "10.000",
"125": "10.000",
"135": "10.000",
"136": "10.000"
},
"data": [
8,
[]
],
"payout": "0.00",
"amount": "0.003362466992",
"profit": "-0.003362466992",
"hide_bets": 0,
"username": "Acer64",
"xp": "900.00000000",
"datetime": "12 Oct 2023 22:18:28",
"avatar": "8",
"avatar_bg": "f34135",
"avatar_builder": 1,
"server_seed": "2ca25f3eeb0cce84690cbad69c61a991101135d8d795e3821cfda55251bb8e1d",
"client_seed": "d64b8399a89512",
"reveal": 1,
"nonce": 3,
"server_seed_hash": "e4fb55e2493e8cca556690c91bd22d1050a83dd6c50c328fb111d5ceeb9efd5f"
}

We see here that the reported result of this bet is 8 and can confirm that result with the code written above.

Lastly, it's noted that this behavior disappears once below a certain bet threshold. For instance, the bets in this post are all around $90 and a winning bet was never seen in a sequence of 10 bets that should have had about a 25% chance of having some return. Of course 4/10 bets actually did return, the casino just misreported the actual outcome. This behavior was not seen at bets closer to $10.

I assert that this casino is fraudulently marking winning bets as losses in a very obvious and easily confirmable way. For that reason, I am leaving a flag.

The Roulette game is programmed by a third-party developer.
I can't answer you about this situation now because we don't know the full code of how is made, but our developers are checking this situation and will come back with more details as soon as possible.

cwil

sr. member

Activity: 285

Merit: 262

Quote from: cwil on October 12, 2023, 06:18:14 PM

Would you mind explaining the results of the following bets?

869601854
869602054
869602352
869602473

The result of bet id 869601854 is as follows:

Code:

{
"id": 869601854,
"game": "Roulette (EU)",
"slot_name": null,
"slug": "roulette-eu",
"slot_slug": null,
"slot": 0,
"currency": "BTC",
"options": {
"20": "10.000",
"66": "10.000",
"67": "10.000",
"89": "10.000",
"101": "10.000",
"124": "10.000",
"125": "10.000",
"135": "10.000",
"136": "10.000"
},
"data": [
26,
[]
],
"payout": "0.00",
"amount": "0.003362466992",
"profit": "-0.003362466992",
"hide_bets": 0,
"username": "Acer64",
"xp": "900.00000000",
"datetime": "12 Oct 2023 22:18:22",
"avatar": "8",
"avatar_bg": "f34135",
"avatar_builder": 1,
"server_seed": "2ca25f3eeb0cce84690cbad69c61a991101135d8d795e3821cfda55251bb8e1d",
"client_seed": "d64b8399a89512",
"reveal": 1,
"nonce": 2,
"server_seed_hash": "e4fb55e2493e8cca556690c91bd22d1050a83dd6c50c328fb111d5ceeb9efd5f"
}

The first value of the data array is 26, and this is the value recorded as having been the result of this Roulette game.

At https://cryptoplay.io/help/fairness, the following code is available to check your provably fair implementation:

Code:

$seed = hash_hmac('sha512', 'my server seed', 'my client seed'.':'.'my nonce');
$seed = hexdec(substr($seed,0,10));
$roulette_number = $seed % 37;

return $roulette_number;

I wrote the following Node.js adpation of the PHP code:

Code:

const crypto = require('crypto');
const hex = crypto.createHmac('sha512', 'd64b8399a89512:2').update('2ca25f3eeb0cce84690cbad69c61a991101135d8d795e3821cfda55251bb8e1d').digest('hex').substring(0, 10);
const res = parseInt(hex, 16) % 37;
console.log(res);

This code indicates the result of the game should have been 21, which would have been a winning result for this particular game.

The results of the next bet in this series, bet id 869601961, follows:

Code:

{
"id": 869601961,
"game": "Roulette (EU)",
"slot_name": null,
"slug": "roulette-eu",
"slot_slug": null,
"slot": 0,
"currency": "BTC",
"options": {
"20": "10.000",
"66": "10.000",
"67": "10.000",
"89": "10.000",
"101": "10.000",
"124": "10.000",
"125": "10.000",
"135": "10.000",
"136": "10.000"
},
"data": [
8,
[]
],
"payout": "0.00",
"amount": "0.003362466992",
"profit": "-0.003362466992",
"hide_bets": 0,
"username": "Acer64",
"xp": "900.00000000",
"datetime": "12 Oct 2023 22:18:28",
"avatar": "8",
"avatar_bg": "f34135",
"avatar_builder": 1,
"server_seed": "2ca25f3eeb0cce84690cbad69c61a991101135d8d795e3821cfda55251bb8e1d",
"client_seed": "d64b8399a89512",
"reveal": 1,
"nonce": 3,
"server_seed_hash": "e4fb55e2493e8cca556690c91bd22d1050a83dd6c50c328fb111d5ceeb9efd5f"
}

We see here that the reported result of this bet is 8 and can confirm that result with the code written above.

Lastly, it's noted that this behavior disappears once below a certain bet threshold. For instance, the bets in this post are all around $90 and a winning bet was never seen in a sequence of 10 bets that should have had about a 25% chance of having some return. Of course 4/10 bets actually did return, the casino just misreported the actual outcome. This behavior was not seen at bets closer to $10.

I assert that this casino is fraudulently marking winning bets as losses in a very obvious and easily confirmable way. For that reason, I am leaving a flag.

komisariatku

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 457

Quote from: Little Mouse on October 13, 2023, 10:59:17 PM

Quote from: Reatim on October 13, 2023, 10:25:55 PM

Quote from: shasan on October 13, 2023, 01:59:49 PM

They might have no funds to continue the campaign.

Whatever their reason is? it is the company's decision to make and we can only speculate to what is the true reason behind ,

This is not really good to speculate such things which may have a negative impact on their reputation. Such speculation is totally unnecessary. They have their team to handle what to do or what not to do. They expect feedback on the product/casino here so they can build a better product.

Honestly, at first I thought they would campaign here for a long time, but maybe they have another strategy and need to make improvements. I hope they will return to this forum. I think they have found the right manager for their campaign. LM is very active and trustworthy, this is my personal statement, not because I am campaigning with him.

I also saw sherbet stop their campaign several times and they come back to the forums. After all, this is a business, there needs to be an effective strategy so as not to waste money. If they need to pause the campaign to evaluate and improve, that's not a problem

kotajikikox

sr. member

Activity: 2632

Merit: 259

Quote from: AndriesW. on October 14, 2023, 12:23:45 AM

Everyone is free to express his own opinion, but this does not mean that it is true.
Do I think it is necessary to answer why I stopped the Signature Campaign?
It is not stopped permanently, we will resume it at another time.
Unfortunately, the feedback and statistics so far have not been according to our expectations.
We are thinking about new promotions for Bitcointalk members that I hope to finalize and launch next week.
So the main reason why we stopped is that the ROI did not come close to our target.

it is good that OP is constantly answering those inquiries and indeed that there is no need to explain from your part , your company and your rules and decisions.
also good to hear that you are still planning to run that ads though takes time to evaluate.

piebeyb

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 1039

Bitcoin Trader

Quote from: Little Mouse on October 13, 2023, 10:59:17 PM

Quote from: Reatim on October 13, 2023, 10:25:55 PM

Quote from: shasan on October 13, 2023, 01:59:49 PM

They might have no funds to continue the campaign.

Whatever their reason is? it is the company's decision to make and we can only speculate to what is the true reason behind ,

This is not really good to speculate such things which may have a negative impact on their reputation. Such speculation is totally unnecessary. They have their team to handle what to do or what not to do. They expect feedback on the product/casino here so they can build a better product.

Yes, I think that as users we should not need to do unnecessary speculation, because only the company knows the reasons, so we must really respect every decision, or maybe they might want to create another campaign because the previous campaign did not reach their target. so they had to make slight changes to their campaign to achieve what they were targeting. so just wait for confirmation from them it will be better.

Don't ever compare it to other big casinos on this forum of course they have more money than casinos that are still very new to being promoted on this forum, the point is to keep encouraging them with feedback in this thread discussing and discussing their casinos will be better seen rather than discussing their campaign. Wink

AndriesW.

copper member

Activity: 27

Merit: 5

Everyone is free to express his own opinion, but this does not mean that it is true.
Do I think it is necessary to answer why I stopped the Signature Campaign?
It is not stopped permanently, we will resume it at another time.
Unfortunately, the feedback and statistics so far have not been according to our expectations.
We are thinking about new promotions for Bitcointalk members that I hope to finalize and launch next week.
So the main reason why we stopped is that the ROI did not come close to our target.

Little Mouse

legendary

Activity: 2268

Merit: 2327

Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse

Quote from: Reatim on October 13, 2023, 10:25:55 PM

Quote from: shasan on October 13, 2023, 01:59:49 PM

They might have no funds to continue the campaign.

Whatever their reason is? it is the company's decision to make and we can only speculate to what is the true reason behind ,

This is not really good to speculate such things which may have a negative impact on their reputation. Such speculation is totally unnecessary. They have their team to handle what to do or what not to do. They expect feedback on the product/casino here so they can build a better product.

Reatim

sr. member

Activity: 2828

Merit: 357

Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!

Quote from: shasan on October 13, 2023, 01:59:49 PM

Stopping the signature campaign might have various reasons. They might have no funds to continue the campaign. Their users may win as a result they might have a shortage of funds. They might have not received too many engagements as they desired. If they stopped for the result then they made a big mistake. As a marketer, I know how results come on a project. Results come slowly and it is like compound interest.

but if their reason for stopping is having lack of funds thinking that they have started with good numbers of participants and also with decent amount of payments I think there is 2 sentiment on that.

First - conducting advertising such Signature campaign shows the attitude of casino to gain support and players and this also shows their capacity to make people believe of their funds.

Second - They are having assessment if the Campaign si truly helping their brand and product towards the top , and may consider trying other option for their advertising.

Whatever their reason is? it is the company's decision to make and we can only speculate to what is the true reason behind ,

Yaunfitda

hero member

Activity: 2870

Merit: 594

Quote from: khaled0111 on October 13, 2023, 06:17:29 PM

Quote from: panjul07 on October 13, 2023, 09:08:25 AM

Long term campaign is also not a guarantee that it will bring good effect to the casinos, why? Simply because the main product/services/offers provided by the casino is the main important thing to attract gamblers to come-deposit-play-stay.
Signature campaign is just an advertisement tool to make people aware about the existence of the product, but real customers will decide to use it or not after looking deeper at the product.
It means that advertisement can be useless if the product is not attractive enough to gain the interest from customers.

You are right when saying that what matters the most is the quality of the service itself. If the customer is not satisfied with the product he purchased or the service he used he will stop purchasing/using it.
However, when talking about marketing and advertisement, you can not expect much results from running a signature campaign on this forum for a single or few weeks. This will not help you in attracting new customers or building your name.
The campaign manager should have explained this to them. A sig campaign on this forum is not the same as renting a banner on a well known website.

Yeah, a single week of campaign will not get any results of a casino. And if this is their way of measuring it with just a week, then I would say that it's completely wrong. I mean at least have a month and see how it goes for you. They are trying to built their reputation here, same goes with so other crypto based casinos. They are competing here, so they need more exposure using sig campaign. But we really don't know what is the reason, could be they are just pausing it and go back at it again after reading our comments here. I think LM could have explained it to them already, but the decision is still with the casino itself whether to continue here or not and look for other means to promote.

khaled0111

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3114

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: panjul07 on October 13, 2023, 09:08:25 AM

Long term campaign is also not a guarantee that it will bring good effect to the casinos, why? Simply because the main product/services/offers provided by the casino is the main important thing to attract gamblers to come-deposit-play-stay.
Signature campaign is just an advertisement tool to make people aware about the existence of the product, but real customers will decide to use it or not after looking deeper at the product.
It means that advertisement can be useless if the product is not attractive enough to gain the interest from customers.

You are right when saying that what matters the most is the quality of the service itself. If the customer is not satisfied with the product he purchased or the service he used he will stop purchasing/using it.
However, when talking about marketing and advertisement, you can not expect much results from running a signature campaign on this forum for a single or few weeks. This will not help you in attracting new customers or building your name.
The campaign manager should have explained this to them. A sig campaign on this forum is not the same as renting a banner on a well known website.

Quidat

hero member

Activity: 2702

Merit: 540

DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

Quote from: shasan on October 13, 2023, 01:59:49 PM

Quote from: TheUltraElite on October 13, 2023, 02:44:35 AM

Firstly I wish all the best for the new casino. Hope the project sees new highs and no lows and zero complaints.

I took part in the signature campaign which ran for only a week and have some stuff to rant about.

Casinos has existed in the bitcoin ecosystem since it was started as a basic means of spending those coins at the lack of other places to spend. Casinos like Primedice/Stake, Fortunejack, back in those days Rollin, Just-Dice and Yolodice (to name a few) all run campaigns at length because they understood the potential of onboarding new and potential members on their site through this forum. In fact campaigns started with Primedice and its sister site Stake is running its campaign at full force throughout the forum now.

Other types of marketing work but this forum is full of users who are earning coins and they need places to spend them and thus the success of the campaigns.

I understand that CryptoPlay's administration and marketing may have different expectations and unique methods of marketing that we are yet to see and bounty manager @Little Mouse would have already explained these things in detail, just my 2sats.

Have a great day everyone

Stopping the signature campaign might have various reasons. They might have no funds to continue the campaign. Their users may win as a result they might have a shortage of funds. They might have not received too many engagements as they desired. If they stopped for the result then they made a big mistake. As a marketer, I know how results come on a project. Results come slowly and it is like compound interest.

Totally agreeing into this sentiment on which it is really that indeed true that results wont or cant really be seen on just a few weeks or 1 week of signature campaign kind of promotion on which they have decided on stopping it just because they havent seen any significant numbers when it comes to sign up or engagement on which it would really be that not shocking specially on a new platform.
Somehow i do agree with those points above that even long time running campaign or marketing doesnt really guaranteed out positive results or outcomes. We do understand that marketing fund is limited and this is why if we do see that they have stopped the campaign then possible reasons could really be just only two reasons which lack of funds or simply stopped because its pointless
for it to be continued to do so.

letteredhub

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 271

Get $2100 deposit bonuses & 60 FS

Quote from: UmerIdrees on October 11, 2023, 06:18:04 PM

Display and visibility do play a major role, no matter if it is related to playing gambling games or display of the gambling site signatures across multiple platforms.

Usually, gamblers will prefer to gamble on desktop devices or laptops and may not want to gamble on mobile devices due to their small screen. It sometimes becomes difficult to focus while gambling on a mobile phone and that is the main reason why we see gambling sites not much interested in the development of their gambling site apps.

You are sure of having a better user experience with the gambling site themes and features while using a laptop or desktop campared to using a mobile phone certain features may look unappealing but with a laptop the difference in quality is normally clear. The convenience with gambling using a laptop is something that any gambling that started his gambling journey with the use of laptop won't gamble with much interest if he has to use a mobile phone later on and that's why many gamblers would prefer the use of laptop to phone despite that with phone you can gamble at any spot you find yourself since it's mobile and handy in size to a laptop.

shasan

copper member

Activity: 2422

Merit: 1313

Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook

Quote from: TheUltraElite on October 13, 2023, 02:44:35 AM

Firstly I wish all the best for the new casino. Hope the project sees new highs and no lows and zero complaints.

I took part in the signature campaign which ran for only a week and have some stuff to rant about.

Casinos has existed in the bitcoin ecosystem since it was started as a basic means of spending those coins at the lack of other places to spend. Casinos like Primedice/Stake, Fortunejack, back in those days Rollin, Just-Dice and Yolodice (to name a few) all run campaigns at length because they understood the potential of onboarding new and potential members on their site through this forum. In fact campaigns started with Primedice and its sister site Stake is running its campaign at full force throughout the forum now.

Other types of marketing work but this forum is full of users who are earning coins and they need places to spend them and thus the success of the campaigns.

I understand that CryptoPlay's administration and marketing may have different expectations and unique methods of marketing that we are yet to see and bounty manager @Little Mouse would have already explained these things in detail, just my 2sats.

Have a great day everyone

Stopping the signature campaign might have various reasons. They might have no funds to continue the campaign. Their users may win as a result they might have a shortage of funds. They might have not received too many engagements as they desired. If they stopped for the result then they made a big mistake. As a marketer, I know how results come on a project. Results come slowly and it is like compound interest.

panjul07

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 1354

Quote from: OcTradism on October 13, 2023, 03:28:56 AM

Signature campaigns can not bring effect if only running in one or a few weeks. It needs to be a long run campaign to have effect but it is challenging for a new casino like any new business. They can have a budget for marketing but they only can run sustainable marketing if budget for it not only comes from the team pocket but also from profit of their business. When their business gets profit, they can use part of profit for marketing and I am sure it is how big casinos do.

They get effects from their long run campaigns and they reuse business profit for their campaign prolongs.

Long term campaign is also not a guarantee that it will bring good effect to the casinos, why? Simply because the main product/services/offers provided by the casino is the main important thing to attract gamblers to come-deposit-play-stay.
Signature campaign is just an advertisement tool to make people aware about the existence of the product, but real customers will decide to use it or not after looking deeper at the product.
It means that advertisement can be useless if the product is not attractive enough to gain the interest from customers.

TravelMug

hero member

Activity: 2632

Merit: 833

Quote from: TheUltraElite on October 13, 2023, 02:44:35 AM

Firstly I wish all the best for the new casino. Hope the project sees new highs and no lows and zero complaints.

I took part in the signature campaign which ran for only a week and have some stuff to rant about.

Casinos has existed in the bitcoin ecosystem since it was started as a basic means of spending those coins at the lack of other places to spend. Casinos like Primedice/Stake, Fortunejack, back in those days Rollin, Just-Dice and Yolodice (to name a few) all run campaigns at length because they understood the potential of onboarding new and potential members on their site through this forum. In fact campaigns started with Primedice and its sister site Stake is running its campaign at full force throughout the forum now.

Other types of marketing work but this forum is full of users who are earning coins and they need places to spend them and thus the success of the campaigns.

I understand that CryptoPlay's administration and marketing may have different expectations and unique methods of marketing that we are yet to see and bounty manager @Little Mouse would have already explained these things in detail, just my 2sats.

Have a great day everyone

You are correct, you can add Bustadice, Bitdice or even Nitro and Betcoin.ag if I'm not mistaken, but the latter has signature campaigns, and has rebranded itself. And just like signature campaigns in the bitcoin mixer field, it's very touch niche, and yet they still have campaigns here and just like the remaining crypto based casinos. I wasn't able to get into the gamble though, but I was surprised to see it just ran for 1 week. Nevertheless, I do hope that Crypoplay.io being a new player in this community will consider to have their signature campaign continue as they have tournaments and many marketing that can really help them if they are going to be exposed here thru sig campaigns.

OcTradism

hero member

Activity: 1722

Merit: 801

Quote from: TheUltraElite on October 13, 2023, 02:44:35 AM

Firstly I wish all the best for the new casino. Hope the project sees new highs and no lows and zero complaints.

I took part in the signature campaign which ran for only a week and have some stuff to rant about.

Casinos has existed in the bitcoin ecosystem since it was started as a basic means of spending those coins at the lack of other places to spend. Casinos like Primedice/Stake, Fortunejack, back in those days Rollin, Just-Dice and Yolodice (to name a few) all run campaigns at length because they understood the potential of onboarding new and potential members on their site through this forum. In fact campaigns started with Primedice and its sister site Stake is running its campaign at full force throughout the forum now.

Other types of marketing work but this forum is full of users who are earning coins and they need places to spend them and thus the success of the campaigns.

Signature campaigns can not bring effect if only running in one or a few weeks. It needs to be a long run campaign to have effect but it is challenging for a new casino like any new business. They can have a budget for marketing but they only can run sustainable marketing if budget for it not only comes from the team pocket but also from profit of their business. When their business gets profit, they can use part of profit for marketing and I am sure it is how big casinos do.

They get effects from their long run campaigns and they reuse business profit for their campaign prolongs.

TheUltraElite

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1253

So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)

Firstly I wish all the best for the new casino. Hope the project sees new highs and no lows and zero complaints.

I took part in the signature campaign which ran for only a week and have some stuff to rant about.

Casinos has existed in the bitcoin ecosystem since it was started as a basic means of spending those coins at the lack of other places to spend. Casinos like Primedice/Stake, Fortunejack, back in those days Rollin, Just-Dice and Yolodice (to name a few) all run campaigns at length because they understood the potential of onboarding new and potential members on their site through this forum. In fact campaigns started with Primedice and its sister site Stake is running its campaign at full force throughout the forum now.

Other types of marketing work but this forum is full of users who are earning coins and they need places to spend them and thus the success of the campaigns.

I understand that CryptoPlay's administration and marketing may have different expectations and unique methods of marketing that we are yet to see and bounty manager @Little Mouse would have already explained these things in detail, just my 2sats.

Have a great day everyone

Topic: Cryptoplay.io - Casino and Sportsbook | Race and Rise to Riches - $2M | VIP ⚽️🎰 - page 2. (Read 1978 times)