Pages:
Author

Topic: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot - page 86. (Read 257856 times)

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
you're really not getting it. if I'd pay you more than dadice, could I be your pimp?  Cool what's your price?

Why would you pay anyone more than dadice does? So there is indeed some corporate vendetta here Cheesy




Anyway I guess this thread will have to live having a few jerks around, better swallow it Smiley Good luck!
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
So has their been any problems with withdrawing? I guess a not small amount of investors is feared now. Judging from the amount of those leaving the campaign.

Saying that... i did not read anyone claiming that withdraws couldnt be served. And im sure some investors would have want their coins back. But i read no complaints that they didnt get them.

Of course... one has to assume that there are investors at all. Though when you think that way, and dadice would have been a scam, then it would live on the investments from outsiders. If they get their coins back without problems then it wouldnt be a scam anymore. And as far as i read we know there was a public investment feature.

Though when i think about the chat hack. The javascript was injected into the chat software. Does that mean the hacker couldnt have done much more than bringing that message up, because the code was contained somehow, or would it have been possible to run ANY code? If the last, then it would be a serious problem, because they could try to withdraw directly from users browsers... or so.

Anyone knows?

Though saying that... dev wrote that an amount was stolen. I wonder how this could happen when it was contained to the chat.

@enervist... i dont think the faucet can be used to empty the wallet since you only can use the faucet money to gamble. It would be too small to be able to withdraw.

you're really not getting it. if I'd pay you more than dadice, could I be your pimp?  Cool what's your price?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
DaDice Administration
and I doubt that dadice's traffic is really increasing....it's pure faucet leeching.

Make no mistake here, 'faucet leechers' are the main part of traffic for any dice site that offers a faucet. Just that others would not admit it - we do Cheesy The point here is, that with 10 'faucet leechers' comes a genuine depositor. Also many faucet users, since we don't like to insult our members, turn into depositors at a later stage. So there is a reason why dadice [and others] are offering a faucet.

if your stats are at least somehow accurate, looking at your "Da leaky tab" and clicking on a couple of random usernames in your trollbox, shows that your faucet is killing the little funding you have left at quiet an impressive speed  Wink check the signal/noise ratio on other sites that offer faucets. none has a ratio as bad as yours. and all dice sites without a faucet are performing better than you anyway.

doesnt that make you reconsider your "business plan" ?

No we had a larger budget for faucet in the first two months as was used, so all still according to our business plan. Our stats are accurate to the satoshi, you should also have a look at the leaders and yes, please consider that some of the 'leechers' are also depositors.

Anyway, thanks for permanently bumping our post, helps us big way Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 1083
Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile
So has their been any problems with withdrawing? I guess a not small amount of investors is feared now. Judging from the amount of those leaving the campaign.

Saying that... i did not read anyone claiming that withdraws couldnt be served. And im sure some investors would have want their coins back. But i read no complaints that they didnt get them.

Of course... one has to assume that there are investors at all. Though when you think that way, and dadice would have been a scam, then it would live on the investments from outsiders. If they get their coins back without problems then it wouldnt be a scam anymore. And as far as i read we know there was a public investment feature.

Though when i think about the chat hack. The javascript was injected into the chat software. Does that mean the hacker couldnt have done much more than bringing that message up, because the code was contained somehow, or would it have been possible to run ANY code? If the last, then it would be a serious problem, because they could try to withdraw directly from users browsers... or so.

Anyone knows?

Though saying that... dev wrote that an amount was stolen. I wonder how this could happen when it was contained to the chat.

@enervist... i dont think the faucet can be used to empty the wallet since you only can use the faucet money to gamble. It would be too small to be able to withdraw.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
and I doubt that dadice's traffic is really increasing....it's pure faucet leeching.

Make no mistake here, 'faucet leechers' are the main part of traffic for any dice site that offers a faucet. Just that others would not admit it - we do Cheesy The point here is, that with 10 'faucet leechers' comes a genuine depositor. Also many faucet users, since we don't like to insult our members, turn into depositors at a later stage. So there is a reason why dadice [and others] are offering a faucet.

if your stats are at least somehow accurate, looking at your "Da leaky tab" and clicking on a couple of random usernames in your trollbox, shows that your faucet is killing the little funding you have left at quiet an impressive speed  Wink check the signal/noise ratio on other sites that offer faucets. none has a ratio as bad as yours. and all dice sites without a faucet are performing better than you anyway.

doesnt that make you reconsider your "business plan" ?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
DaDice Administration
and I doubt that dadice's traffic is really increasing....it's pure faucet leeching.

Make no mistake here, 'faucet leechers' are the main part of traffic for any dice site that offers a faucet. Just that others would not admit it - we do Cheesy The point here is, that with 10 'faucet leechers' comes a genuine depositor. Also many faucet users, since we don't like to insult our members, turn into depositors at a later stage. So there is a reason why dadice [and others] are offering a faucet.
full member
Activity: 132
Merit: 100
Proving solvency shouldn't be an issue, but I have no problems with withdrawals from this site and I've withdrawn over 1 BTC on multiple occasions which took less than 12 hours to be processed but this was a few months ago before all this proving solvency mess started. I haven't played here in a while, but I assume it is still a good site. However, I remember dicebitco.in and dice.ninja and they were also great sites until one tried to cheat and the other simply vanished into thin air. Hopefully DaDice sees the concerns people are raising and it seems they do for the most part as they disabled investing in public but still allow it in private. This simply hides the fact that they don't want to prove solvency which is fishy as hell, but nothing to go crazy over. In the end, all we can do is hope they are here to stay.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
To be fair, NLNico was the one who initially reported on the problem of the site's probably insolvency. I'm just one of the ones he attracted.
Insolvency causes you to be unable to pay your debts. Whether those debts are to your investors or to your players isn't important. Someone you owe money to is getting screwed.
...
These are the amounts wagered per day for the last 7 days before I stopped accepting BTC bets:

Code:
2014-06-17    2210.31584730
2014-06-18    2273.14902642
2014-06-19    7463.21723620
2014-06-20    1653.27568022
2014-06-21    1794.46972037
2014-06-22    1490.13643029
2014-06-23    1907.71386701

That's 18792 BTC wagered in the last week. DaDice has had what, 5000 BTC wagered in total? I shut down because I was uncomfortable holding such a huge amount of investor money.
...
Before JD shut down it was the biggest by far. After we shut down, the volume went to PD. JD switched to CLAM to deliberately lower the volume, and it still gets more volume than DaDice can achieve, even with its blanket advertising.
...
True. They also have every right to try to claim I am jealous of their "success". And I have every right to point out how ridiculous their claim is.
...
I read your posts. They just don't make much sense.
...
Nothing. If you stop making dumb claims about me and/or JD I will stop addressing them. Deal?

Woah... my posts don't make sense? Exactly what part didn't make sense? The one where I pointed out how shallow and stupid your thinking is? Only if you had read one of my posts before about transparent statistics (which I still claim!!!) you wouldn't have made that mistake. Well the way I see it everyday Da Dice wagered amount is increasing, Da Dice also has a little but fair number of high rollers. You added CLAM to Just-dice in december 2014! You have had been running just-dice since june 2013 right? wait at least this much period before you start comparing statistics. Da Dice never claimed its already # 1 dice site, it will get there sooner or later Smiley we all know that.

And even in your threads the ones who started them or constantly bump your threads are the ones criticizing dadice here, "coincidence? I think not!!!"... Anyway since you're here to discuss problems of Da Dice, how about we discuss the one where you ripped off your investors with 1300 BTC with a bullshit story that you had already paid the guy and shit went down and whatever! It was the investor's profit! Now I call you a rip off as well! Just go a google search there are a number of users even "Hero Members" from BCT calling you a scammer and shit.

You have made your point and concerns very clear, you even gave them all a negative trust rating, (don't take it back!) but if your consciences is still not at ease, I don't know what the fuck will! Ever heard of a word "conflict of interest?", you as admin of a dice site and (possibly?) investor in other gambling programs should know better. It doesn't look good at all doog! I am still in shock that how come Dean proved himself smarter then you, when he decided to leave this conversation after constantly repeating his concerns.

If you have an agenda to bash Da Dice on purpose, then contact this piece of shit friend of yours:

So are you okay with trusting a large amount of money on a site where a random person was able to execute arbitrary JS on their customers' computers?

...whose nick name is "account seller" but profile message says "No longer selling accounts", probably fulfills all the needs of Troll & Co. regarding shill accounts to slander dadice.

good lord, density still increasing  Grin

care to link at least two hero members calling dooglus a scammer/shit? I'm fairly sure your google-fu sucks.

and I doubt that dadice's traffic is really increasing....it's pure faucet leeching.  take away the sig campaign and there would be no one except you and dadice themselves left to defend this scam in spe. would be interesting to know how much btc has been burned by dadice so far. my guess is something betwen 50-100BTC without a single satoshi profit.  Grin worst run dice site so far. pretty sure they'll be gone before the year has ended.

ps: acctseller is an alt of quickseller, guess he has to do a couple of posts for the rollin.io sig campaign.

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
ignoring all facts posted by that dooglus guy to keep the scam in your signature alive? very sad behaviour...

The fact about the facts posted by dooglus is that none of them are facts, just assumptions, "Oh! I am terribly poor at predicting future!", "Oh no! I didn't call you a ponzi scam!", "Oh I didn't mean that what I meant was what I didn't mean to say remains the meaning what I should have said!"
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
To be fair, NLNico was the one who initially reported on the problem of the site's probably insolvency. I'm just one of the ones he attracted.
Insolvency causes you to be unable to pay your debts. Whether those debts are to your investors or to your players isn't important. Someone you owe money to is getting screwed.
...
These are the amounts wagered per day for the last 7 days before I stopped accepting BTC bets:

Code:
2014-06-17    2210.31584730
2014-06-18    2273.14902642
2014-06-19    7463.21723620
2014-06-20    1653.27568022
2014-06-21    1794.46972037
2014-06-22    1490.13643029
2014-06-23    1907.71386701

That's 18792 BTC wagered in the last week. DaDice has had what, 5000 BTC wagered in total? I shut down because I was uncomfortable holding such a huge amount of investor money.
...
Before JD shut down it was the biggest by far. After we shut down, the volume went to PD. JD switched to CLAM to deliberately lower the volume, and it still gets more volume than DaDice can achieve, even with its blanket advertising.
...
True. They also have every right to try to claim I am jealous of their "success". And I have every right to point out how ridiculous their claim is.
...
I read your posts. They just don't make much sense.
...
Nothing. If you stop making dumb claims about me and/or JD I will stop addressing them. Deal?

Woah... my posts don't make sense? Exactly what part didn't make sense? The one where I pointed out how shallow and stupid your thinking is? Only if you had read one of my posts before about transparent statistics (which I still claim!!!) you wouldn't have made that mistake. Well the way I see it everyday Da Dice wagered amount is increasing, Da Dice also has a little but fair number of high rollers. You added CLAM to Just-dice in december 2014! You have had been running just-dice since june 2013 right? wait at least this much period before you start comparing statistics. Da Dice never claimed its already # 1 dice site, it will get there sooner or later Smiley we all know that.

And even in your threads the ones who started them or constantly bump your threads are the ones criticizing dadice here, "coincidence? I think not!!!"... Anyway since you're here to discuss problems of Da Dice, how about we discuss the one where you ripped off your investors with 1300 BTC with a bullshit story that you had already paid the guy and shit went down and whatever! It was the investor's profit! Now I call you a rip off as well! Just go a google search there are a number of users even "Hero Members" from BCT calling you a scammer and shit.

You have made your point and concerns very clear, you even gave them all a negative trust rating, (don't take it back!) but if your consciences is still not at ease, I don't know what the fuck will! Ever heard of a word "conflict of interest?", you as admin of a dice site and (possibly?) investor in other gambling programs should know better. It doesn't look good at all doog! I am still in shock that how come Dean proved himself smarter then you, when he decided to leave this conversation after constantly repeating his concerns.

If you have an agenda to bash Da Dice on purpose, then contact this piece of shit friend of yours:

So are you okay with trusting a large amount of money on a site where a random person was able to execute arbitrary JS on their customers' computers?

...whose nick name is "account seller" but profile message says "No longer selling accounts", probably fulfills all the needs of Troll & Co. regarding shill accounts to slander dadice.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
CURRENT ROLL STANDINGS TO 200 MILLIONTH ROLL!!!

We have hit 191 million rolls now! 

0.05 BTC growth per day for every day sooner than the 19th!!

Who will be the lucky bounty winner?! And who will have predicted the correct date?! Keep your eyes on this page! The final countdown has begun!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
lots of words...

tldr; dadice fucked up once more and is grasping every straw in reach.

tldr.... that sums it up I believe. You couldn't be bothered to actually read a detailed explanation as such your statement is invalid thus nothing but spam. Well done
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
lots of words...

tldr; dadice fucked up once more and is grasping every straw in reach.
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
When somebody says they were able to "Hack DaDice" and/or penetrate thru Da Dice system/servers = Wrong!

I am not trying to intimidate our dear "exploiters" here but I must admit chats and broadcasts running thru socket service (which is totally independant in its operation, and anyone who has been to Da Dice once is the witness to this that whole system keep working even without those services) is perhaps the only vulnerable area of Da Dice gameplay interface, and why would we mind "almost free" security checks in first place?

I mean every decent website has a "whitehat bug bounty program", so does Da Dice! only if they reported it to support without exploiting it, they deserved a reasonable reward for it nevertheless that is not their agenda! They want to spread fear and disturbance to back up all the FUDs right here.

Unlike all other dice sites, Da Dice is unique and has far more number of features and interfaces within our main gameplay interface and we claim that we are still evolving into something even better.

Anyway, all this happened this time because our socket script didn't sanitize some data (background variables, exploited from console) which was sent along with chat messages or other online/offline commands. Of course it took exploiter a considerable amount of time to write infectious code (2 days is it?) and successfully broadcast it to users. Ofcourse bodgybrothers is our exploiter here who couriously had been asking about "hi!" alert dialog, but this time we had a serious misjudgment and thus we let this happen. Between, we have had been busy with a major update to Da Dice as well which will be announced later today.

If we only notice the time difference between last attack on chat and this one (which I agree is more serious), and all the logs/events we monitor everyday its very clear that some one has been financing our exploiters lately. There are few other people too who found bugs and were paid from our bounty program, I recommend they do the same since there is a possiblity we might pay you better then what they can afford Smiley

Interestingly the site does not use even basic protections like setting the session cookies to HttpOnly, which would have made it trivial to have harvested and saved all users session ids (as simple as: document.cookies) to save to to for withdrawing funds

Anyone still using this site, has been warned that most 12 year olds code better sites.

I am afraid but you were also right. This is a server side configuration and we had this in place until our last crash and then server rebuild during 100m event. Since Da Dice operated on dedicated servers, all these configurations are set globally from top instead of setting them on run-time. We overlooked this setting but it has now been corrected! Thank you for pointing it out, Attack Dog Jerry Smiley
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
[snip]


At least this part was funny! Smiley

ignoring all facts posted by that dooglus guy to keep the scam in your signature alive? very sad behaviour...
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1081
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
[snip]


At least this part was funny! Smiley
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
How to invest in the site?

Sure feel free to invest your ponzi collections into this site, you will be satisfied in the end Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1333
I'll reply in a single post so as not to spam this thread too much more. I'll try to make this my last post as I think everything has already been said...

I think that's the right move.

I'll keep it short...

you've attracted a whole cadre of haters

To be fair, NLNico was the one who initially reported on the problem of the site's probably insolvency. I'm just one of the ones he attracted.

Now all of sudden according to dooglus his, demand for proof of solvency is about Da Dice ability to process withdrawals. Are you fucking kidding me?

Insolvency causes you to be unable to pay your debts. Whether those debts are to your investors or to your players isn't important. Someone you owe money to is getting screwed.

You are known to informally invest 53 BTC on a site with no proof of solvency (we are still talking about cold storage, aren't we?), post about it on forum! and then get 11 BTC profit from it (still lmao) and then post about it on forum! and then when inquired about it, it was a 0 BTC transaction. Anyway I will still take Rhavar's word on it.

What's your point? If I had been asked to prove that I had control of the 53 BTC, I would have done so. I wouldn't have made a series of weak excuses and ended up saying "the deal's off so now I don't need to prove anything". That would have made it look like perhaps I didn't have control of the 53 BTC after all.

But Just-dice is stilla  shitty site based on coinroller.

I don't know what coinroller is.

You added CLAM because no one would play on your site with BTC anymore

These are the amounts wagered per day for the last 7 days before I stopped accepting BTC bets:

Code:
2014-06-17    2210.31584730
2014-06-18    2273.14902642
2014-06-19    7463.21723620
2014-06-20    1653.27568022
2014-06-21    1794.46972037
2014-06-22    1490.13643029
2014-06-23    1907.71386701

That's 18792 BTC wagered in the last week. DaDice has had what, 5000 BTC wagered in total? I shut down because I was uncomfortable holding such a huge amount of investor money.

If we go by the volume then PD remains the king of arena, you are no where in counting

Before JD shut down it was the biggest by far. After we shut down, the volume went to PD. JD switched to CLAM to deliberately lower the volume, and it still gets more volume than DaDice can achieve, even with its blanket advertising.

Da Dice has every right to advertise their banners where they want.

True. They also have every right to try to claim I am jealous of their "success". And I have every right to point out how ridiculous their claim is.

But as usual dooglus will not read my enitre post, its bitter isn't it?

I read your posts. They just don't make much sense.

Just tell me this: What the fuck do you want?

Nothing. If you stop making dumb claims about me and/or JD I will stop addressing them. Deal?

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
no longer selling accounts
So are you okay with trusting a large amount of money on a site where a random person was able to execute arbitrary JS on their customers' computers?
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1081
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

What a joke this site is. Every week something surfaces that makes it even more sketchy than before.

As long as they keep on paying their sig participants, all is good.  Cool

seriously man.. you don't need to make them look shady coz the neg rep is enough to warn people here.. you're just wasting energy
As long as they keep funding the escrow address for their signature campaign their shills (and people who are willing to whore out their signature for a scam site) will be able to continue advertising for them.


I cannot imagine why anyone would think it would be no big deal that an attacker can run arbitrary JS on their customers' computers.

I think it is pretty funny that a total of .008 BTC was stolen from their hot wallet though  Cheesy

Everyone in this thread needs to make sure you know that ACCTseller is the trolling alt of Quickseller.  He uses it to troll when he doesn't want to draw attention to his main account.  He used to try to keep it a secret, but it's been publically admitted (even by him).  Just for everyone's informatino.

Guess what guys, a hot-wallet is a hot-wallet.  It gets used for withdrawals.  Are you really going to take the word of a guy who's been in this thread trolling non-stop for days that a hot wallet was "hacked" just because he publishes a bitcoin address and shows a chart. It's not like he's an impartial observer, he's been spreading FUD for days now and for all we know he's getting paid by folks like Quickseller to do so.

Non-insanse people here are going to wait a while to see what the devs say about this.  Geez the drama on this forum has really become over-the-top.
There have been multiple reports from people getting random HS popups. This has even been confirmed by DaDice that someone had hacked their chat.

Can you say with a straight face that you would have no problem trusting a site with large amounts of money to gamble with when a random person is able to execute arbitrary JS on your computer via their site?

I can say with a straight-face that you are trolling this thread now with an alt in order to avoid drawing even more negative attention to your main account.  I can say with a straight face that saying things like this:

Quote
I think it is pretty funny that a total of .008 BTC was stolen from their hot wallet though  Cheesy

Is clearly trolling.

I can say with a straight face that I wouldn't be surprised if you hired someone to execute this attack given your penchant for vendettas, your reputation for trickery and your lust for power and hatred of those who have crossed you.
Pages:
Jump to: