DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot - page 89.

bodgybrothers

member

Activity: 106

Merit: 10

Quote from: bodgybrothers on June 03, 2015, 10:22:55 AM

Quote from: Da_Dice_Staff on June 03, 2015, 03:33:30 AM

Quote from: bodgybrothers on June 02, 2015, 07:04:42 PM

Can DaDice explain the popup that occurred? I heard a popup saying "Hi" appeared on user accounts. This means someone ran the javascript "alert("Hi")" on client computers. Being able to run Javascript code on anyone else's machine is a serious issue. I heard the Mod said it was some new feature... So is it due to live testing or a hack?

Yup it's live testing indeed. There are some updates coming along

Ok, fair enough. I now have another couple of questions. Why are you running test code on a production site? Standard practice is to have a development server that gets tested on.
And what awesome function is coming from using "alert('hi')"? I don't see anyone using JS alerts anymore.

My questions have not yet been asnwered..

iram91445

full member

Activity: 238

Merit: 100

★YoBit.Net★ 200+ Coins Exchange & Dice

Quote from: ?? on ??

Indeed, dooglus is the biggest piece of envious shit you will ever find!

..and your last 50 posts are either shilling DaDice here, or on the PrimeDice thread. Please hurry up and run with peoples funds, so we don't need to see your DaDice spam.

its interesting to see a brand new account talking like that, i also think that they might be scammers

dadice

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

DaDice Administration

Quote from: ?? on ??

Indeed, dooglus is the biggest piece of envious shit you will ever find!

Well, for us dog is just another jealous competitor.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 01:22:36 PM

Quote from: marcotheminer on June 03, 2015, 01:11:24 PM

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 12:05:29 PM

Well it seems to me that most people here are immature.

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 11:55:18 AM

lol you understand a shit about dice sites Wink

Thanks for your reply anyway I guess.

You forget to quote the second part, where I explained

By intention or overseeing it?

Btw, nice trust rating you have there, I thought mine was worse, but yours is much better Roll Eyes

Thanks

dadice

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

DaDice Administration

Quote from: marcotheminer on June 03, 2015, 01:11:24 PM

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 12:05:29 PM

Well it seems to me that most people here are immature.

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 11:55:18 AM

lol you understand a shit about dice sites Wink

Thanks for your reply anyway I guess.

You forget to quote the second part, where I explained

By intention or overseeing it?

Btw, nice trust rating you have there, I thought mine was worse, but yours is much better Roll Eyes

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 12:05:29 PM

Well it seems to me that most people here are immature.

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 11:55:18 AM

lol you understand a shit about dice sites Wink

Thanks for your reply anyway I guess.

dadice

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

DaDice Administration

Quote from: mfaspk on June 03, 2015, 12:27:25 PM

Don't worry all our records are straight, I remember them by heart now... Moneypot bankroll was private, dooglus "informally" invested 53 BTC, you paid him 11 BTC profit (lmao), you had no need of proving solvency when you were running it as a game, you only did it when you turned it into a vault. I guess its such a good story that I must also add "...and they happily lived ever after!" ... see our records are straight

straight all the way

Yeah they are all Saints of course, only we are willful sinners.

mfaspk

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: RHavar on June 03, 2015, 12:18:18 PM

Quote from: mfaspk on June 03, 2015, 12:10:38 PM

You apologized, I apologized, where did you come back in the picture? oh I see, because I got fed up with the crap that dooglus is throwing all over, isn't it?

You brought up my site with incorrect information, I just wanted to set the record straight. =)

Don't worry all our records are straight, I remember them by heart now... Moneypot bankroll was private, dooglus "informally" invested 53 BTC, you paid him 11 BTC profit (lmao), you had no need of proving solvency when you were running it as a game, you only did it when you turned it into a vault. I guess its such a good story that I must also add "...and they happily lived ever after!" ... see our records are straight

straight all the way

dadice

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

DaDice Administration

Quote from: RHavar on June 03, 2015, 12:18:18 PM

You brought up my site with incorrect information, I just wanted to set the record straight. =)

Do this in your thread or with the concerned member "mfaspk" via PM. I would never discuss my very own issues in another sites thread.

RHavar

legendary

Activity: 1463

Merit: 1886

Quote from: mfaspk on June 03, 2015, 12:10:38 PM

You apologized, I apologized, where did you come back in the picture? oh I see, because I got fed up with the crap that dooglus is throwing all over, isn't it?

You brought up my site with incorrect information, I just wanted to set the record straight. =)

dadice

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

DaDice Administration

Quote from: RHavar on June 03, 2015, 12:07:07 PM

And yes, I'm concerned about DaDice's solvency and would not recommend anyone to play there until they sort it out. Feel free to deride me for being a jealous competitor, but we both know that's nonsense.

Of course you are only concerned about our solvency - obviously! Do you have any interest in our site? Ever deposited? Waiting for a withdrawal?

RHavar

legendary

Activity: 1463

Merit: 1886

Quote from: mfaspk on June 03, 2015, 12:10:38 PM

@RHavar... you're concerned for solvency, MoneyPot before being a "vault" (whatever you call it) ... accepted private investors?

Again, the private investors never transferred a satoshi. It was just a gentleman's agreement, before my time, to share the profits and/or losses. The investors had no solvency concerns, as the money never left their wallets.

Quote

well the posts history suggests there was private investment with "mentioned amount of bitcoins",,, but I will take your word for it, care to show me your cold storage address when moneypot was a game? or proof of solvency except those "Total Bullshit" hashes

(when moneypot was a game!) ...or should we rather discuss this on moneypot thread?

Sounds like a good idea, as it's getting a bit off topic here =)

mfaspk

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

@RHavar... you're concerned for solvency, MoneyPot before being a "vault" (whatever you call it) ... accepted private investors? well the posts history suggests there was private investment with "mentioned amount of bitcoins",,, but I will take your word for it, care to show me your cold storage address when moneypot was a game? or proof of solvency except those "Total Bullshit" hashes

(when moneypot was a game!) ...or should we rather discuss this on moneypot thread?

You apologized, I apologized, where did you come back in the picture? oh I see, because I got fed up with the crap that dooglus is throwing all over, isn't it?

dadice

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

DaDice Administration

Quote from: shitaifan2013 on June 03, 2015, 11:55:25 AM

I undestood Marcos question that way, that he wanted to know if any site profit was used for the campaign, which I just proved. while you claim some initial budget was solely used for that.

maybe I understood Marcos wrong.

You have proven nothing mate. I have many cold wallets here and there, so I take funds where I have quick access to, to pay our bills. Also you should re-read properly what I have said earlier

RHavar

legendary

Activity: 1463

Merit: 1886

Quote from: mfaspk on June 03, 2015, 11:23:50 AM

Its clear that more number of posts here are from either competitive casino owners, their co-owners or private investors. (Dah! sure! investing in public is a whole different animal isn't?) and their agenda is nothing but to slander Da Dice.

I think you are intentionally misframing the debate. As a casino owner, I routinely recommend competitors and I have absolutely zero hostility any of them, in fact, I've even helped a number of them set up clones of bustabit using our source code. And just today today I was talking on chat about how much I like playing luckyb.it, I think PrimeDice is one of the most trustworthy sites out there, etc. I've told a number of investors that from a pure maths point of view, PRC and bitdice.me are strictly better investments than MP (due to higher bankroll turnover). I think JD has the best site operator out there, period . etc.

And yes, I'm concerned about DaDice's solvency and would not recommend anyone to play there until they sort it out. Feel free to deride me for being a jealous competitor, but we both know that's nonsense.

Quote

MoneyPot had been accepting "private investors" since October 2014 or even before while cold storage is from 10th april 2015 (I know I know we've been over this, since it was a private bankroll, it didn't need a cold storage / proof of solvency) but our dear dooglus (whome I still respect) still had invested there and was one of their private investors back in 2014.

We already covered this. The private investors transferred zero coins, they only agreed to pay if the site took a loss and be paid if the site made money. The site made money, they got paid. End of story. What do you want, proof of 0 coins?

dadice

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

DaDice Administration

Quote from: Da_Dice_Staff on June 03, 2015, 12:00:18 PM

Quote from: Da_Dice_Staff on May 21, 2015, 03:16:20 PM

If you had bothered to read the previous posts you would have understood the reasoning especially with the removal of the investments now. I said it before and I will say it again.

Our players both loyal older players and new are all happy with DaDice. It is therefore no concern of yours seeing as you are neither.

The same goes to all of those who are not members/players on DaDice. Your comments and actions on this thread are well described by clevarookie in earlier posts. You have said your pieces and have had those anwers DaDice would give. If you feel that you have warned people then fair enough, you may now withdraw with your conscious at ease.

However. I dare each and every one of you to look back on this in a few months time and if proven wrong I personally expect you to admit your errors and apologise here in that particualr instance. Until then please refrain from the continued and quite childish FUD spamming

once again I am posting my own statement from earlier. Allow me to reiterate a key point from above: If you feel that you have warned people then fair enough, you may now withdraw with your conscious at ease.

All this is doing from my perspective is attempting to pick at an old wound that doesn't even exist any more. mfaspk had it exactly right above yet the arguments here devolve into the same ridiculous rehashing of the same points without ever taking into account points like the above. Quite frankly it's like a childrens playground. So some of you don't trust us. wow that's fantastic you've made your point and the evidence is there. Continual rehashing only makes you look desperate for attention. Like the boy who cried wolf. and yet as mentioned before a real scam is happening under your bloody noses but because DaDice is growing so quickly you have to focus there than on the real issues.

Well it seems to me that most people here are immature. Even Theymos I have learned is still a college kid....

mfaspk

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: Da_Dice_Staff on June 03, 2015, 12:00:18 PM

once again I am posting my own statement from earlier. Allow me to reiterate a key point from above: If you feel that you have warned people then fair enough, you may now withdraw with your conscious at ease.

What the fuck are you thinking? These people have any reasoning? rational thoughts? This is a bunch of evnious FUD-trolls. All of them trolls and their puppies either run a DICE site or public/private investor of some dice site. Just look at logic of "dooglus":

Quote from: mfaspk on June 03, 2015, 11:44:03 AM

Quote from: dooglus on June 03, 2015, 11:27:44 AM

I didn't say you were a Ponzi scheme. I said that your "so far we are still allowing withdrawals" argument is typical of Ponzi schemes.
I know what a Ponzi scheme is, thanks.

Quote from: dooglus on May 21, 2015, 12:14:20 PM

I guess so. But at what point? I'm horrible at predicting the future. I thought dicebitco.in and dice.ninja were the good guys, and that PRC wouldn't last 6 months. I was wrong in all 3 cases...

Quote from: dooglus on May 21, 2015, 11:04:42 AM

Proof of solvency proves solvency. It's in the name. It doesn't prove anything about trustworthiness. It simply proves that they still have the coins they were entrusted with. Isn't that worth proving? Isn't it alarming if someone who you trusted to look after coins for you refuses to show you that they still have them and makes up weak excuses about why they can't?

How dooglus rolls:

1. "hey! I am not saying they are not trustworty!!"
2. "hey! I am not saying they are a ponzi!!!"
3. "hey! I am not saying they would scam!!!"
4. "hey! I am always wrong at predicting future but I wouldn't give it up, why should I?"
5. "hey! I don't think they will run away with funds but they still could??"

..."I will still leave a negative trust here, eventhough I don't think they are not trustworthy"

https://i.imgur.com/9BvvhNK.png

Da_Dice_Staff

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: Da_Dice_Staff on May 21, 2015, 03:16:20 PM

If you had bothered to read the previous posts you would have understood the reasoning especially with the removal of the investments now. I said it before and I will say it again.

Our players both loyal older players and new are all happy with DaDice. It is therefore no concern of yours seeing as you are neither.

The same goes to all of those who are not members/players on DaDice. Your comments and actions on this thread are well described by clevarookie in earlier posts. You have said your pieces and have had those anwers DaDice would give. If you feel that you have warned people then fair enough, you may now withdraw with your conscious at ease.

However. I dare each and every one of you to look back on this in a few months time and if proven wrong I personally expect you to admit your errors and apologise here in that particualr instance. Until then please refrain from the continued and quite childish FUD spamming

once again I am posting my own statement from earlier. Allow me to reiterate a key point from above: If you feel that you have warned people then fair enough, you may now withdraw with your conscious at ease.

All this is doing from my perspective is attempting to pick at an old wound that doesn't even exist any more. mfaspk had it exactly right above yet the arguments here devolve into the same ridiculous rehashing of the same points without ever taking into account points like the above. Quite frankly it's like a childrens playground. So some of you don't trust us. wow that's fantastic you've made your point and the evidence is there. Continual rehashing only makes you look desperate for attention. Like the boy who cried wolf. and yet as mentioned before a real scam is happening under your bloody noses but because DaDice is growing so quickly you have to focus there than on the real issues.

cazkooo

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1013

Quote from: shitaifan2013 on June 03, 2015, 11:55:25 AM

I undestood Marcos question that way, that he wanted to know if any site profit was used for the campaign, which I just proved. while you claim some initial budget was solely used for that.

maybe I understood Marcos wrong.

If it is so then I have asked this question few minutes ago but I think dadice is too busy replying or fighting with dooglus and the other here. My question is still not answered here dadice, if you have some time then you can answer it

Quote from: cazkooo on June 03, 2015, 11:01:36 AM

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 09:07:18 AM

Quote from: marcotheminer on June 03, 2015, 08:37:18 AM

Is dadice paying signature campaign funds out of their own pockets or out of their cut of site profits?

Everything is paid from our initial budget: Salaries, campaigns, bonuses, advertising, other expenses. As it was explained before, we couldn't have done so with our current profits.

By budget does this mean this including your investor fund? I believe you still have a few private investor that stick with you. Without you providing cold address it is hard to look at this if you are paying from your investor fund or no because you spend like more than 15 btc just for promotions in 1 month I guess

mfaspk

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: dadice on June 03, 2015, 11:44:59 AM

...As the other poster just confirmed, we are the only dice site with transparent statistics.

They'll either want to kill you, kiss you, or be you.

- Suzanne Collins, Mockingjay

all dooglus, and co has to offer is "speculations", "rumors", "personal opinions and vendetta posted over and over again"... Dean proved to be a smarter one! +1 Dean, -1 Doog.

Very sad to see dooglus being a total FUD... "I don't think they are scam, but could be a scam!" I mean "wtf? is that?"

Topic: DaDice.com - Next Gen Social Gambling Dice Experience | Progressive Jackpot - page 89. (Read 257856 times)