Add that to the fact that no one in their right mind would troll this hard really makes this seem plausible. The narrative is just too... rich.
You've obviously never heard of Toblerone Triangular, an absolute master of the "let me convince you all that I'm a paranoid schizophrenic Ron Paul supporter" gimmick (believe me, this guy convincingly presented himself as more batshit insane than the TimeCube guy). He eventually revealed himself as a gimmick poster and explained his method.
The best way I found was to take a bunch of unfounded statements like "gold is money" or "America is doomed if Ron Paul doesn't win" or "Ron Paul hat immer recht" and to treat them as if they're logically consistent with each other and unfalsifiably true. Then all you have to do is interpret events in the world in a way that attempts to brings them into line with those assumptions. The original statements don't have to be that extreme but you don't have to do this long before you're having to come up with more and more twisted and paranoid logic to explain why your premises are correct and what's actually taking place in reality is wrong.
You only have to start by saying traditional polling methods consistently undercount Ron Paul's voters because they don't have landlines to ultimately end up advocating that Wolf Blitzer should have his throat cut on live TV ~pour encourager les autres~. The fun is getting from one to the other and bringing the reader with you.
The whole triangle theme was a complete fluke. I never named my account TobleroneTriangular because I had some long-standing plan to incorporate sacred geometry into what I was doing, I just though it had a nice ring to it. But in answer to your question I wanted to make some kind of "helpful" diagram to explain the idea of natural/unnatural rights that I was banging on about and I wanted it to be just evocative enough of a kind of underlying mental instability or monomania that it made people begin to think there was something more going on here than a legitimate, rational appreciation for Ron Paul and the gold standard and all the rest.
However at this time I wasn't linking the diagram I was trying to come up with with my name. I was actually trying to do something with the Star of David so as to play up my latent "issues with Jews" stat and I wasn't really having much luck when it came to me in a flash: what is the Star of David anyway? Two triangles. Triangles. Toblerone Triangular. Holy shit. From that point on I knew exactly what I had to do. And I do remember thinking I had to get the diagram just right because if I managed to pull this off then it would be being emptyquoted back at me for the rest of time. I knew if anything was going to be my trademark then this was it so it had to perfect, jpeg artifacts and everything.
I'd run out of road. By the end I was advocating turning the US into Ron Paul's own Democratic Kampuchea and shilling for Hitler in his purely defensive war against the Jews, where do you go from that? I'd reached the Mohorovic discontinuity of my own insanity and I was in danger of undoing a lot of the goodwill people had towards me. I never wanted to be annoying or monotonous, I always wanted people to be enlivened either by disbelief or anger or pity or whatever else by the brand of lunacy I was touting. If I couldn't achieve that any more then I couldn't do what I wanted to.
dank's nowhere near as much fun as TT, unfortunately.