Still waiting, little cunt(h)
weaksauce privacy wannabe coin
Tell me the source address of this transaction then if it's oh so weak:
Dash De-anonymization ContestIcebreaker and other trolleros:
I have donated $1 to Monero's development team. I sent 0.25 Dash (TX ID: 59d51690d4b56ddbf1e393fa8d3a49bcfc3247f270f36be3b6ee411802666cba-000) to shapeshift.io, which converted it to Bitcoin and sent it to the official Monero donation address listed at
https://getmonero.org/getting-started/donate/.
I challenge you to de-anonymize this transaction. To make it just a little easier, I only used four rounds of Darksend, so it's exponentially less private than it would be with the maximum eight rounds.
Please tell me what address this transaction originated from.
Cheers!
generalizethis who is said to have one of the highest IQ's on the forum has stated many times that to de-anonymize DASH transactions is a trivial exercise.
Why can't he de-anonymize your transaction?
Did I say that? Maybe I said for a motivated attacker, but I'd like to see a quotation--I certainly don't have the resources to break any coin's anonymity unless all it requires is a blockchain explorer.
What I said, and Evan Duffield will back me up on this, is a cryptosystem that doesn't employ privacy at the protocol, is suboptimal or second rate when compared to cryptosystems that have protocol level privacy features.
I somewhat covered the "break it " argument in this thread #2:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14472374Let's remember that shadowcash supporters were hectoring Monero supporters with the same "break it" argument--up until Shen broke it.
Honestly, it seems dumb to break it atm, since etholution is purported to have another privacy scheme that uses end-to-end encryption--though if you layer it with paynodes, you're most likely to end up with the same second rate privacy--would be nice to see a white paper with the required math to go along with the endless stream of promises. But, why do that, when noobs can be fooled with a few infographics and the repetition of invalid assertions?
But if you feel so strongly about your privacy features, why don't you sign up for this? Notice it's for
transactions and messaging.
http://thehackernews.com/2016/04/secure-messenger.htmlMy guess is that experts, who understand what a motivated attacker is and does, will need about two seconds to see the obvious flaws in dash's design. But feel free to enter and have your shitty privacy coin invalidated by an authority bigger than any one that resides on BCT, maybe that reality check will free up the time I waste correcting your false assertions, but my guess is you'll go full-Cruise and say it's a conspiracy against
scientology dash to prevent it from reaching its moon base.