Also, Toky, if you knew better, you'd realize that public blockchain can be replaced with coinbase
Unfortunately, it can't.
But I'm quite happy for you to wallpaper the rest of this thread with the false assertion that it can if you like. The reason I won't loose any sleep over it is that there has never in history, zip, nada instance neither Roman time nor Dinosaur time been a case where obfuscation enhanced monetary properties rather than diminished them (for a base monetary token that is).
Nothing to do with "math".
But like I say. Be my guest
And I won't lose any sleep knowing that building a cryptosystem using the trust model is just layering (unnecessarily so) the same BS that inspired people like Satoshi to invent Bitcoin--unless you're saying you can't trust Bitcoin's coinbase either, are you?
I'm trying to figure out why anyone would trust you and Evan's defenders not to have instamined 30%, kept it, and used the rewards to buy more masternodes--but what really confuses me is why the people who would be dumb enough to trust a bunch of cryptoanarchist's posers wouldn't just use one of the many trust systems that banks and software companies will be advertising with established brands and decades, if not centuries, of experience--my guess is that your plan is to attempt to be just cryptoanarchist enough to fool early adopters who will be reading posts like this and say the exact thing I'm saying, "This is about the biggest pile of BS in the cryptosphere. How does anyone fall for this shit?"
But keep on throwing decentralized and Satoshi's dream out there--though I'm fairly certain that you are only netting near sighted speculators with that bait, and anyone who manages to do the least bit of due diligence is swimming for better waters. BTW, does Amanda realize her reputation is being used as bait? Maybe you should warn her Tok or do really believe your slight-of-hand buzzworded info-graphics meant to wow the dull witted, the research handicapped, or theoretically challenged? I mean, "If it's in an info-graph, it must be true? Right?"
Also, did you just give up on trying to prove that there isn't a trustless way to verify dash's masternode distribution? Let me guess, you're gonna try to say that a way that can be easily gamed by market manipulation proves that the nodes are being sold, the same false flag logic that you used to say the instamine was redistributed? Isn't that how it works? "See this graph of coins being sold and masternodes disappearing, which proves that there's redistribution!" Sure it does, if we assume the instaminers are honest, that no one ever manipulates markets, that masternodes fees can't be leveraged for more masternodes while selling a percentage for profit--sure, if all those things work exactly the way you explain to noobs, then you can call dash decentralized--I'll be waiting for your usual misdirection and scatterbrained explanations.
Or maybe you can just ignore the neon elephant in the room waving sparklers and singing, "God save the King, Evan reign supreme, take my next of kin and what's left of my Liberty!"