Mining not running today? I had problem earlier, maybe fixed now
Works fine at my side. Is there any packet loss between your PC and pit.deepbit.net ? 
Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 72. (Read 1601330 times)
July 03, 2012, 07:48:48 PM
July 03, 2012, 06:53:30 PM
Mining not running today? I had problem earlier, maybe fixed now
[img]http://alfixturedesign.com/420/deepbiterror.jpg[img] 
July 03, 2012, 06:52:49 PM
Mining not running today? I had problem earlier, maybe fixed now
Been running like a top all day here.
July 03, 2012, 06:48:09 PM
Mining not running today? I had problem earlier, maybe fixed now
June 29, 2012, 12:18:14 AM
Oh, alright then. I'll stop teasing kano 
You shouldn't use a 24 hour mean round length because if you do a harmonic mean has to be used to find an overall mean. If you don't do that, round lengths appear longer since you're looking at an average of rates (shares per round per day). Averaging over the same number of blocks avoid this.
OK yes I see my mistake You shouldn't use a 24 hour mean round length because if you do a harmonic mean has to be used to find an overall mean. If you don't do that, round lengths appear longer since you're looking at an average of rates (shares per round per day). Averaging over the same number of blocks avoid this.
I'm comparing apples and oranges ...
A day in time cant be compared when deciding on the average block 'luck' since bad luck blocks will of course run longer and thus affect a "daily" average more that short good luck blocks.
June 28, 2012, 08:03:55 PM
Buy insurance then and you wont have to worry about luck as much.
When DeepBit has a long period of bad luck, you're covered to whatever extent you want.
When DeepBit has a long period of bad luck, you're covered to whatever extent you want.
June 28, 2012, 06:59:07 PM
Even so, we are over 10% above difficulty since the last change almost a week ago, still not very good
June 28, 2012, 06:46:59 PM
Oh, alright then. I'll stop teasing kano
You shouldn't use a 24 hour mean round length because if you do a harmonic mean has to be used to find an overall mean. If you don't do that, round lengths appear longer since you're looking at an average of rates (shares per round per day). Averaging over the same number of blocks avoid this.
You shouldn't use a 24 hour mean round length because if you do a harmonic mean has to be used to find an overall mean. If you don't do that, round lengths appear longer since you're looking at an average of rates (shares per round per day). Averaging over the same number of blocks avoid this.
June 28, 2012, 11:01:53 AM
I
Run a few sample calcs if you want. I did while I was setting up miner's insurance, and it's why I average over rounds, not days. At 30*D per day hashrate the calculated average will be 3.5% longer than it should be. I haven't gotten around to a proper proof yet, but I understand why.
Snip
If only proving yourself correct in everything were this easy...
The longer the blocks, the greater the effect on daily luck.
If you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
SnipIf you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
Run a few sample calcs if you want. I did while I was setting up miner's insurance, and it's why I average over rounds, not days. At 30*D per day hashrate the calculated average will be 3.5% longer than it should be. I haven't gotten around to a proper proof yet, but I understand why.
Snip
If only proving yourself correct in everything were this easy...
June 28, 2012, 10:15:12 AM
I
Oh yes it will!
Run a few sample calcs if you want. I did while I was setting up miner's insurance, and it's why I average over rounds, not days. At 30*D per day hashrate the calculated average will be 3.5% longer than it should be. I haven't gotten around to a proper proof yet, but I understand why.
My post wasn't really aimed at you but to let miner's know that "24hr luck" will make them think the pool's luck is worse than it is.
The longer the blocks, the greater the effect on daily luck.
If you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
Eh? No it wont.If you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
Oh yes it will!
Run a few sample calcs if you want. I did while I was setting up miner's insurance, and it's why I average over rounds, not days. At 30*D per day hashrate the calculated average will be 3.5% longer than it should be. I haven't gotten around to a proper proof yet, but I understand why.
My post wasn't really aimed at you but to let miner's know that "24hr luck" will make them think the pool's luck is worse than it is.
June 28, 2012, 09:52:33 AM
The longer the blocks, the greater the effect on daily luck.
If you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
Eh? No it wont.If you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
The only problem with looking at a daily average is ... it's a daily average (again Sample vs Population
)One day it may be low, the next day it may be high.
Compared to the long term it means nothing, but it will certainly not always be bad, it will, on average, be bad half the time and good half the time
and aside: my post was simply pointing out the worst day I know of here at deepbit, nothing about what to expect
Deepbit also has an 825% share block back around then (not the last one on that page either) and that 8x factor seems to show up in BTC mining when looking at somewhat more extreme results, so I take that as a point to note when people complain about 400% to 700% share blocks and say that 800% blocks are certainly not unexpected ...
June 28, 2012, 09:34:48 AM
The longer the blocks, the greater the effect on daily luck.
If you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
If you want to compare pool luck between different periods, you need to compare round length for a set number of rounds, not per day. Compare one sequence of 50 rounds with another.
Taking a daily average will make daily luck seem, on average, bad.
June 28, 2012, 09:18:34 AM
Well you only need to go back almost 4 months for 50% (200% shares per block)
https://deepbit.net/stats/1330819200
I think that might be the record worst day
https://deepbit.net/stats/1330819200
I think that might be the record worst day
June 27, 2012, 11:48:07 PM
June 27, 2012, 10:42:30 PM
73.7% 
I never seen it this bad in all the time I've been mining. With luck like this I might as well solo.
81.5%
I never seen it this bad in all the time I've been mining. With luck like this I might as well solo.
81.5%
June 27, 2012, 06:42:34 PM
57.2% 
\
edit: 64.2 What is going on? I'v never seen it this bad before.
\
edit: 64.2 What is going on? I'v never seen it this bad before.
June 27, 2012, 06:34:19 PM
Edit: my bad, it is actually 45% over difficulty at ~2500000
Not your lucky day.
June 27, 2012, 05:43:31 PM
What is going on today? Worst luck I think I have seen since I left Slush... We are currently at 25% over difficulty for 24 hours
Edit: my bad, it is actually 45% over difficulty at ~2500000
Edit: my bad, it is actually 45% over difficulty at ~2500000
June 25, 2012, 03:29:59 AM
DeepBit miners, the answer to your variance problems is here!
DeepBit Miners Earnings Insurance bonds.
If you mine here proportionally and invest in these bonds, I pay you if the pool has bad luck. The bonds work just like PPS only at a 1.5 to 1.8% fee.
Please PM me or post to the MEI.DEEPBIT.A thread for more information
DeepBit Miners Earnings Insurance bonds.
If you mine here proportionally and invest in these bonds, I pay you if the pool has bad luck. The bonds work just like PPS only at a 1.5 to 1.8% fee.
Please PM me or post to the MEI.DEEPBIT.A thread for more information
June 24, 2012, 10:14:19 AM
Site doesn't looks slow to me at all and I don't see any pool's hashrate decline, so it may be caused by connection problems with some specific part of the internet, may be. Checking this.
yep I get connection time out's ever few seconds
2012-06-23 18:25:40: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
2012-06-23 18:30:59: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
2012-06-23 18:35:26: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
2012-06-23 18:39:44: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
2012-06-23 18:47:22: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
2012-06-23 18:52:11: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
2012-06-23 18:58:12: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
2012-06-23 18:59:32: Listener for "Deepbit (ufasoft)": Switching to http://f2.deepbit.net:8332
What ever the prob was its back to normal
no stales in 200 shares
Jump to: