Topic: Default Trust List is a Joke.Theymos Save This Forum. - page 7. (Read 6296 times)

if you and your "dt friends" and the random account follow the tracks you will see i sold 1 account so far, the terms state i will reveal all information about the sale as soon as i see the account involved in something shady. i keep following the accs i might sell and the one i already sold. if you think this is wrong, i welcome everyone to leave a feedback with a refference.

i would like to know who i am speaking to, just asking.

Oho, you can call me childish, my posts childish, but not my ratings  
I'm gonna let Lutpin answer that , sometime tomorrow probably. Weird though, he's online nearly 15/7
Well having quite the mindset of QS, I have a reason to believe you are an alt of someone who recently PMed me. A member wanting to start over. Blame QS for it I guess

Awesome , really? You read it? Don't finish on the first book in the series though

Lol, come up with facts some "non-foreign" guy.

I was actually quite surprised when I( and especially Lutpin) got added to DT. Although Blazed did say I was "near DT material" or something similar, QS was going to be added before me. I expected at least a few months before he'd get around to considering me for DT again.
Also even though you keep calling me the "foreign" I somehow seem to have better English speaking/writing skills. Just saying.

You accusing/ in your words "talking about" me trolling? Irony

Sure go for it, expect retaliation like this one, perhaps even bigger considering many of the existing DT members are against neg-tagging account sellers. Also, then you'd just get newbs who won't get their rep affected , selling accounts. Also, I probably don't have to tell you how theymos deals with community backlash about people on DT 1.

Also your only bragging point in this thread has been you being in control of a Legendary DT 2/1(I'm confused) with over 50 ratings, with no names disclosed. Not that I'm trying to "ad homien" attack you, but you seem pretty cool with it being general knowledge

You're free to have your opinion, but community "vote" says otherwise

Now you're just grasping at straws, I trust his ratings. How he makes BTCs is none of my business, and apparently none of others when QS was selling DT accounts

Edit: Seriously guys, lets have a 5 min cool-down after each reply

if you want to -ve me because you are thinking selling accs from defaulted loans is not right, i welcome you to do so!

Heutenamos, your name was randomly used as an example because YPII brought it up, not more not less

I don't know if i am an alien or what but if i am gonna get abused for sharing my opinions then i am sorry cause i expected some level of maturity in the discussion.I have a habit to imagine myself in victim as well as accusers position and come to the most fair solution ,without expecting my personal gains.Sorry if i was not supposed to do that.

SG defaulted his account to zazrb.How old was he and how trusted was he ?

He indirectly started abusing me cause i am posting in a thread which is against him.Just LOL.

Aren't rats like you who re sell accounts are the reasons for primary scams in the first place ? I don't like repeating myself I'm operating through a Public Computer in a Remote Offsite work.How does knowing my real identity make you less guilty ?

Just proved one of my issues with this group forming in this response. A continued escalation against those that you personally feel are bad for the community and not what is right for the community all around. Try to look at the other side of this and you will notice a lot of coup attempts look exactly like this.

Yes i do, like most lenders that accept accounts as collateral. If the "random account" is able to read he might have seen that there is a list available of loans i had given. suprise, suprise. And yes, i am currently selling accounts of defaulted loan. All without trusted feedbacks! If you decide to -ve me with your main acc because i do so, please make sure you leave the correct refference so people can see it. I own them so i can sell them. i got them by a legit way, documented with signed messages. ask me about them i can proof it.

Instead of trying to sound like the cool hardcore btct pro bitcoin expert, who coded like 6000 lines while having a cold, being blind with his hands behind his back and using his nose to hit the keyboard, enlight us who you are and i welcome your friends to directly ask me what i am doing and why. i wait five minutes before i check back for you reply.

oh and btw, yes i have socks i use to contact sellers and guess what people know about it.

So here's what's going to happen next.I shall be creating a group of my own {we DT 1 members} and negative tag everyone who is selling forum accounts.Try not to be astounded when you will be the primary part we might be negative rating.A random account messaged me you being a lender with possession of multiple accounts as defaulted loans.

If you're laws to step-up to the selling of Unauthorized Goods are truthful , you should be negative trusting yourself as selling of forum accounts is a heinous crime.I would categorize it as even worser than selling of third party Goods.

@Mexxer-2 You truly included a member who offers forum account sells  to your trust list ? Just includes to your youthfulness {immaturity} to be on the DT.  

posted by the guy hiding behind a throwaway...

I'm surprised your brainchild lutpin has not commented here yet ? On the other hand is it hard to post answers utilizing your Alternative record ?

I would not be blown away if the other shill account lutpin comments afterwards.The sole reason you literally begged to drive in the pool of DT was to use it is a privilege and not a Responsibility.

At this point yes, but many of their ratings are questionable

What surprises me in the gift cards matter is the fact that they are using their numbers to force people into releasing information

the drama occurs because biased scammers got tagged and than cry because they got caught.

So its just about the gift card ratings?

---

I checked lutpins ratings and I see nothing wrong either. They focus more on ratings regarding hacked/stolen accounts (Netflix for 2 cent) and alts (not only of scammers) than mexxer-2. I decided not to create a long list as it seems wasted efford from the replies here.

I am not attacking Blazed but when i see multiple threads daily then obviously it is silly drama for nothing in return and that is what i said.

which opinion ? how am i harassing you ? i am talking to you and i didn't tagged you a negative to do what i want.

---

Now, as i see you have started trolling & i am not interested in it,you may continue.Thanks.

Honestly, I have nothing against mexxer-2 (except for, sorry mexxer, his childish positive ratings). He seems like a nice guy and if Blazed thinks he's trustworthy, by all means go ahead.

It's Lutpin I'm slightly more skeptical about - and, IMHO, I have good reason to. I've done my research on him and from what I've seen, he seems okay but has no real background; okay, he manages the forum image of Crypto-Games (along with a few others, I think) and mods there, but from what I can tell with my light digging in, his claim to fame is that he's mexxer-2's friend and they have loaned each other a substantial amount. His recent negative feedbacks are more based on personal opinion than on proof; but again, I have a neutral stance and if Blazed thinks Lutpin is deemed trustworthy enough to be on DT then I'm fine with it.

All in all, I think it's good to note that being on DT is not for people who will take their position in a non-serious approach. If you guys stay on DT (which is probable) then just realize that maybe it's time to think slowly into things. (Not saying you guys are immature; it's just a friendly remark.)

TL;DR: Everything's good, it's Blazed's decision, no amount of moaning and groaning will do anything. It's time for everyone to grow up and mature, both complainers and the "victims" (for a lack of a better word).

And before anyone asks, no, I'm not a sockpuppet account. I've done my research as a newbie, improbable as it seems.

P.S. Artemis Fowl was a great read. @mexxer-2

Nope I said I had the time to do so(feel free to quote the post which I think you're referencing)
And that is another sentence that you wrote, that I don't understand
Ehm over 10 posts against me and Lutpin?
While you are harassing me to accept your opinion, and constantly attacking Blazed with "This guy is being nothing more than a nuisance who is hurting your reputation" . Also are you not offering your opinion here?

Well I'd love to say this
But I guess being new in DT doesn't give you that privilege, gotta wait for a few more months I guess.

On the first place you said you enjoyed that, didn't you ? and secondly i appreciated that,didn't I ?

No, I just ask people to think for a while and nothing else.That is your created agenda.I never said anything is cool or not.

No, I wont.I lost the challenge.

How am i targeting ?

---

OK i don't want to be bitch here,but i cant agree to people getting harassed for no reason other than IMO's.

Are you saying anyone isn't free to create their own list of people who they trust, and use DT not because they're lazy but because theymos is forcing it down their throat? You're kidding right?

While you're forcing Blazed to remove me from his trust list, while making it seem as if his reputation is getting affected by me. Anyway, so, you guys are allowed to question my activities/loans/ratings while I can't question something that is suspicious and can(and according to anonymous has been proved to a trusted member) be proved otherwise if provided the proof?

It makes me smile, nothing more and nothing less. I dont care about my position in the DT system, i posted that several times. But i am putting up more -ve's the last days while collecting urls for my reports. I review sections when i have some time and do ratings regardless of who already left one.

i have excluded DT from my list and just added some people, my current depth is 0. I still review all the ratings before interacting with people.


LOL! First you asking to leave people alone and let them do what they want, now you want the trust system moderated. MADE MY DAY!