Do none of the recent scamcoins have the time travel fix?
Did litecoin leave it out like bitcoin did, thinking their hash rate is so huge it would never happen to them, and all the scamcoins didn't bother to put it in because they were too stupid to even check what fixes litecoin had not yet implemented oro so crazy they thought they would have litecoin's level of hashing right from the start?
-MarkM-
Topic: delete (Read 4669 times)
You can hate or like BitcoinExpress for what he is or what he does, but if he can do it, others can too.
The fact that he openly talks about it, makes us more aware of the dangers that exist.
You can ban him from Bitcointalk.org but it doesn't change the danger to any low hashrate altcoin at the moment.
If you want to protect your coin against a 51% attack, put your hashrate at it or don't complain.
The fact that he openly talks about it, makes us more aware of the dangers that exist.
You can ban him from Bitcointalk.org but it doesn't change the danger to any low hashrate altcoin at the moment.
If you want to protect your coin against a 51% attack, put your hashrate at it or don't complain.
we need him to help the environment as i said, much like we need maggots to help turn dead things into usable things - its all a part of nature -
so he is useful - , but in a maggot like way -
can you wait so i can buy or mine some Digitalcoin ? i want to sell on the massive bump its going to get after all the attention .
I openly invite you to try your best with DGC. 
When a DEV openly request such an action it is no longer an attack, but a simple public service.
This is going to be a first though, I'm going to have to build a working block explorer to kill it.
baritus, are you still feeling like you want your chain stress tested?
~BCX~
Ok now this just looks like the good old bait and switch gypsy trick - all that an attempted attack is going to do is , make Digitalcoin (my "coin") look like the hero when they survive -
thus making it that much more popular and increasing the # - Vern is involved with Digitalcoin so he will immediately halt trading and they will roll back the BC or fork it with Checkpoint - so you will gain 0 -
just looks like more scams to me.
but whatever.
you kids play .
Protip: When DDoSing private servers
1.) Get the pool op's permission to participate in this ... "test"
or
2.) Don't post it on public forums you're doing it
That said, I wholeheartedly welcome this verification of DGC's heartiness. If it fails, RIP. If it survives, may it enjoy it's 1000 year reign.
1.) Get the pool op's permission to participate in this ... "test"
or
2.) Don't post it on public forums you're doing it
That said, I wholeheartedly welcome this verification of DGC's heartiness. If it fails, RIP. If it survives, may it enjoy it's 1000 year reign.
I did not welcome anyone to attack. I welcomed a guy who is bragging about taking down a coin with around 2.7 mh/s total hashpower.
Yes lets welcome someone who may or may not have access to 1Gh of hashing power to kill the coin you produced. Which many people invested in. Playing games with other peoples money is not something a "developer" should do
Who are you? God?
A developer does whatever the hell a developer wants to do like any other human.
Whether or not PWC was 51%'d, or these guys could ever do it to DGC (or were ever planning to), to me this is pretty telling. I want to see DGC succeed as much as the next guy, its by far my most successful pool, but man, baritus, your really not coming across well through all this (imo). Perhaps you just don't care, and thats your choice, but it reflects on your coin too.
I'll continue to support DGC as I have, for the time being, but I just don't get any of this BS, or the responses to it. Do what you like, as you said, I guess....
Just to inform everybody , Big Vern found nothing wrong with pwc and powercoin is back on trading on Cryptsy now.
So, does this mean all this whohaa started, because of some dick, with photoshop?
Pretty much. I guess we have too many sheep just believing everything they read without investigation here.
Just to inform everybody , Big Vern found nothing wrong with pwc and powercoin is back on trading on Cryptsy now.
So, does this mean all this whohaa started, because of some dick, with photoshop?
Good advertising though.
Just to inform everybody , Big Vern found nothing wrong with pwc and powercoin is back on trading on Cryptsy now.
So, does this mean all this whohaa started, because of some dick, with photoshop?
I did not welcome anyone to attack. I welcomed a guy who is bragging about taking down a coin with around 2.7 mh/s total hashpower.
Yes lets welcome someone who may or may not have access to 1Gh of hashing power to kill the coin you produced. Which many people invested in. Playing games with other peoples money is not something a "developer" should do
Who are you? God?
A developer does whatever the hell a developer wants to do like any other human.
I did not welcome anyone to attack. I welcomed a guy who is bragging about taking down a coin with around 2.7 mh/s total hashpower.
Yes lets welcome someone who may or may not have access to 1Gh of hashing power to kill the coin you produced. Which many people invested in. Playing games with other peoples money is not something a "developer" should do
Maybe all this hoohaa just added to DGC's value?
I did not welcome anyone to attack. I welcomed a guy who is bragging about taking down a coin with around 2.7 mh/s total hashpower.
Yes lets welcome someone who may or may not have access to 1Gh of hashing power to kill the coin you produced. Which many people invested in. Playing games with other peoples money is not something a "developer" should do
Just to inform everybody , Big Vern found nothing wrong with pwc and powercoin is back on trading on Cryptsy now.
I did not welcome anyone to attack. I welcomed a guy who is bragging about taking down a coin with around 2.7 mh/s total hashpower.
I was referring to the OP's(who had 2 posts) supposed group of powerful friends and himself as "you".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
baritus, re-read the post from me you are quoting. I said the exact same thing you are saying and said that's what you WOULD have said if you intended to mean anyone beyond just the OP. I will also clarify within that quote box so it is not misconstrued by others as well.
But openly welcoming anyone to attack shows he believes it cant be. Which is just hilarious
I was referring to the OP's(who had 2 posts) supposed group of powerful friends and himself as "you".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
baritus, re-read the post from me you are quoting. I said the exact same thing you are saying and said that's what you WOULD have said if you intended to mean anyone beyond just the OP. I will also clarify within that quote box so it is not misconstrued by others as well.
I was referring to the OP's(who had 2 posts) supposed group of powerful friends and himself as "you".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
Bitcoin express do us all a favor and kill off DGC.
Bartibus your incompetence astounds me. Your ego is out of control. Why would you openly invite ANYONE to attack DGC?
If you think the person who killed PWC is not capable of killing DGC think again. DGC can and thanks to you probably will be 51%ed If I had the hashrate I would put your ego in check myself
Edit: attack may have been fake but It could have just as easily been real
RICO Act?
I was referring to the OP's(who had 2 posts) supposed group of powerful friends and himself as "you".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
No one else was threatening anything, so it wouldn't apply to them, by common sense.
MashRinx, I said "you", not "anyone".
Bcx read ya PM. Cheers
Shouldn't you be saying that your DEV baritus, who issued the original challenege in the first place?
All he needs to do is simply come in here and state for the record he withdraws his original challenge to kill his coin.
That's all.
~BCX~
The way I read it, baritus made the statement to the OP of the thread he posted that comment in. He used the word 'you', meaning the OP. I would think that if he meant to open it up to anyone, he would have stated:
Quote
What baritus did NOT say: I openly invite anyone to try their best with DGC.
I think he was calling the bluff the OP who attacked a coin with what I hear was < 3 Mhash at the time, not everyone who would stumble upon that post.
Jump to: