Topic: delete - page 3. (Read 4669 times)
The point is the dev is foolish for encouraging it. It's like waving a red rag in front of a bull just to see if it will charge.
are so many people here really bull headed? not a mature one in the bunch?
The point is the dev is foolish for encouraging it. It's like waving a red rag in front of a bull just to see if it will charge.
what's the point dev just put in a checkpoint and the attack is worthless. all it will do is slow down the network for as long as they are attacking it. miners will come back after the attack is over. not sure how DGC will be "dead"?
The wallet does have up to date checkpoints
The last checkpoint was 22 days or 106,841 blocks ago.
They even successfully attacked FTC, FTC has much higher hashrate than dgc. I think its time now for the alts to unite and vote an alts that we need to survive.
Facts? Don't think so. But I'm not sure either, so I'll ask instead of being .. ok wont go there really:
So anyone knows FTC hashrates just before an attack? I heard they were under 700MH.
I thought it was around 150MH/s
They even successfully attacked FTC, FTC has much higher hashrate than dgc. I think its time now for the alts to unite and vote an alts that we need to survive.
Facts? Don't think so. But I'm not sure either, so I'll ask instead of being .. ok wont go there really:
So anyone knows FTC hashrates just before an attack? I heard they were under 700MH.
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
don't DDoS mah pool please!
Do you have a DGC pool?
~BCX~
I do
Don't worry BCX will stop the attack after 3 days. Your pool will function again.
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
don't DDoS mah pool please!
Do you have a DGC pool?
~BCX~
They even successfully attacked FTC, FTC has much higher hashrate than dgc. I think its time now for the alts to unite and vote an alts that we need to survive.
ok...
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
Marketing tactic? Were all talking about it now
lol marketing tactic...until it backfires and the community takes you seriously.
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
don't DDoS mah pool please!
Do you have a DGC pool?
~BCX~
I do
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
Marketing tactic? Were all talking about it now
Why, maybe I actually hate myself for being human
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
It's just a remark made in the sense of, 'you'd need a large botneed to do so, probably not going to happen', not an *actual challenge*.That idiots here pick it up like that and are going to try to kill it, that's because people suck, not because the dev actually expected that to happen.
Threads like these are the reason I am a misantrope.
Misantropes are hypocrites because they themselves are human
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
It's just a remark made in the sense of, 'you'd need a large botneed to do so, probably not going to happen', not an *actual challenge*.That idiots here pick it up like that and are going to try to kill it, that's because people suck, not because the dev actually expected that to happen.
Threads like these are the reason I am a misantrope.
Still the dev did openly challenge anyone to 51% his coin so...
What I can't figure out is why any DEV wanting their coin to flourish would make such an insane challenge especially when total network has is about 1 G/HS including the pools.
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
I've just done some calculating and it appears that by DDoS the pools, the solo hash rate will be less than 300 M/HS.
Also Vicurex just picked this coin up, think they want to be part of an attack vector brought on by the DEV?
~BCX~
It's called: overconfidence.
I'm inclined to agree...I think it's a bit premature to throw a 1GH attack against the coin, especially when most/much of the miners are sitting in vulnerable pushpools. The wallet does have up to date checkpoints, but you'll still be 51%ing the network. ...one where the coin has no POS, a 20 second block time with only 5 confirms required. I hold a decent amount of DGC currently (half mined, half bought) and this has me a bit concerned.
bye bye DGC
Jump to: