Topic: delete (Read 165538 times)

Yep, super bad idea. Why would anyone try this, whats the benefit? To me it just seems like blockchain bloat and nonsense

it was well written nonsense... i've read to §5 and he planned to get data from websites and store them in the blockchain to implement contracts which imho is a bad idea

He's been spamming the same post all over the place. Someone dropped the hammer on him!

I think this active thread is deleted, why?

Active thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--947839

Ive designed a very specific technical implementation to add trustless, tradable, contracts on the Cryptonote prototcol.

The whitepaper can be downloaded from Google drive

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B75gaqtEgDR8UHU2UVJ6TkYzMnRkdFFsbklBd3hVMDV1eDQw/view?usp=sharing

I am looking to implement this very soon on one of the existing Cryptonote coins.

Looking for suggestions, criticisms, anything that will facilitate this implementation. Unlike most other suggestions or whitepapers I have the full technical ability and experience to implement these changes. I don't want to deal with the prospect of launching a new coin, nor should I have to as these changes would only improve the features of an existing Cryptonote coin.

Roman Brown
[email protected]

Oh and the finale where he tells all lol...

Lol and this gem... 

Oh and about that "deal" with monero....lol

TOR is pretty leaky, relative to an NSA-scale threat model.  It is getting better, and will continue to get better.  These things are always an arms race.  Key is to use a defense-in-depth strategy.  Cryptonote over I2P accomplishes that pretty well, when it comes to fruition.

Are we both talking about the same person? After almost a year of reading the guy's posts I'd like to think that I would have caught that.


He always seemed to have that view toward specifically bitcoin, but now seems to have come to the conclusion that no decentralized cryptocurrency can overtake bitcoin, because none of them can remain decentralized. Therefore logic would follow that he'd think cryptocurrencies are useless.

Just seems like a major change from before, he always seemed pretty confident that a scalable, anonymous, transaction free currency would overtake bitcoin .. but now seems to be not so confident that that is possible.

I just think it's dark times because he always seemed to be claiming to be working on something amazing, pretty sure he said it was a cryptocurrency .. and now he made the same statement in the post I linked that he seemed to be considering just going back to software developement .. like all hope for this was lost.

A lot of what I picked up about flaws in TOR .. i picked up from him. Was it confirmed compromised though? I didn't catch the article for that. His posts have personally been some of the most influential material I've come across to date on this board (and there's been a lot of stuff to sort through in the last year), and I have benefited greatly from the knowledge he shares.

Honestly, out of a group of people less than I can count on one hand, whose participation here I currently depend on to rationally return here day after day .. he's not the only one going through a crises of confidence right now. At least two others are bereft of faith in this, one seems to have left this board already, the other is planning on leaving soon. This doesn't even include all the other people whom I don't hold the same level or respect for, who are also experiencing the exact same feeling.

AM seems to have a different viewpoint than me currently on Monero, and crypto in general .. and I wish I could tell him what I see in a way that makes sense to him .. but I guess I just don't know exactly what it is, or just don't spend the time to properly put it into words .. but that's just fine. There's other people here.

Anonymint? I don't think he has much interest in shit like that.

Nah, he's always had that opinion more or less. It's just that as time passes some things he says look more likely than they did before. One example that I can think of that I dismissed was his view on tor being compromised. He gets some things right for sure, but there are a lot of other predictions that he makes that I consider unlikely but we'll have to wait and see. He seems to have a decent track record so far though so I guess it will be interesting to see how things work out. I highly doubt the whole 2015.75 thing but I think a lot of his general ideas wrt to government controlled digital money and what would happen to Bitcoin with all this regulation aren't too far off the mark at all.

Hes always finding new ways to scare noobs into selling btc and buying his new coin whenever he creates it by paying a dev.. Dont mind him

You're welcome, bitch.

Close enough for proof?

Let's all send him PM's!

Seems that he's taken on a new orientation regarding cryptocurrencies in general though .. dark times.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/ununoctiumtesticles-385303
i believe this is him, but i cant proof it...

What happened to AnonyMint in all this? He always says he's leaving the forums, but usually is posting again within a couple of days.

That's extremely suspicious to say the least...LOL

Before this all began, I viewed BitcoinExpress in a favorable light, now I view him opposite from that. If he had actually used his time to attack coins that are actually scams or sketchy, like even Xcurrency that arguably duped it's investors(of which even I lost $ on, though a measly sum ), but he choose to go after a coin that's actually promising...

It's all very odd, and it has me wondering what's really going on with him.

They call them the rubber-knife crew.