deleted - page 10. | Bitcointalksearch.org

dishwara

legendary

Activity: 1855

Merit: 1016

Dark knight

Code:

Because some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money.
They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with.
Some men just wanna watch the world burn.

They also forget one thing. The earth is never a flat one, but a circular one.
If one gives pain to other, then they will get the same or more.

bitcoiners

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: smoothie on July 24, 2012, 01:15:52 PM

Quote from: El Cabron on July 24, 2012, 07:26:55 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on July 24, 2012, 02:11:27 AM

@Coblee

This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.

The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.

Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....

This is fair warning to all.

Challenge accepted.

~BCX~

Standard shorter tactics:

   1. Badmouth the security
   2. Announce a major negative event for it
   3. Crash the price
   4. Buy a ton when it's worth nothing.

And y'all are swallowing the whole thing hook line and sinker.

yeah, i just bought everything up to .006 again. thanks for helping me get some coins!

I hope you realize right now you're not getting anything really cheap at all...especially if the price falls and people sell...

First of all some asshat is not going to destroy my confidence in LTC. I will continue to buy even if it tanks back to 0 and will weather the storm. Don't see how he'll gain anything though. Other than maybe federal charges.

Litecoin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Litecoin on July 24, 2012, 01:09:45 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Graet on July 24, 2012, 12:56:42 PM

not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( Cool

) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).

but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...

Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ?

If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ?

It makes no difference where you at. If someone from France hacked banks located in the US, then the yanks will go after the hacker, drag him to the US and prosecute him there.

But, if the authorities don't think you are big and bad enough to drag you from one country to another then...
What happens when a lengthy, highly technical investigation shows that the cybercriminals are located in a foreign country? The only way to bring them to court is to cooperate with foreign law enforcement authorities. But what if these foreign law enforcement authorities do not want to collaborate, or do not have the technical capabilities to assist the investigators? Unfortunately, this type of case scenario happens all the time. This poses a major challenge to the prosecution of cybercrime and there does not seem to be any magical solution other than international cooperation. Cybercrime is a transnational crime, and solving the issue of cyber jurisdiction requires nations to work on harmonizing substantive laws and fostering cooperation between law enforcement agencies worldwide. Indeed, the Interpol (International Police Force) has a plan for international cooperation against crime, including cybercrime, that most countries have joined.

smoothie

legendary

Activity: 2492

Merit: 1473

LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper

Quote from: El Cabron on July 24, 2012, 07:26:55 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on July 24, 2012, 02:11:27 AM

@Coblee

This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.

The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.

Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....

This is fair warning to all.

Challenge accepted.

~BCX~

Standard shorter tactics:

   1. Badmouth the security
   2. Announce a major negative event for it
   3. Crash the price
   4. Buy a ton when it's worth nothing.

And y'all are swallowing the whole thing hook line and sinker.

yeah, i just bought everything up to .006 again. thanks for helping me get some coins!

I hope you realize right now you're not getting anything really cheap at all...especially if the price falls and people sell...

bitcoiners

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Graet on July 24, 2012, 12:56:42 PM

not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( Cool

) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).

but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...

Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ?

If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ?

Very relevant. If I get hit by a ddos, I will turn it over to the feds. And yes unless he lives in IRAN he will be brought to the US on those charges.

Good Luck though.

Brunic

hero member

Activity: 632

Merit: 500

I find it sad that all the work towards Litecoin made by the people around here will go to waste. Especially since it was an honorable attempt for a cryptocurrency, not trying to scam or destroy Bitcoin, but simply to complement it.

I don't see the point. It's a complete waste of time for BCX, because nobody will benefit from this. Not BCX, not the developers, not the community, nobody.

Litecoin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Graet on July 24, 2012, 12:56:42 PM

not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( Cool

) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).

but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...

Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ?

If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ?

It makes no difference where you at. If someone from France hacked banks located in the US, then the yanks will go after the hacker, drag him to the US and prosecute him there.

Simran

hero member

Activity: 714

Merit: 500

Quote from: Graet on July 24, 2012, 12:56:42 PM

not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( Cool

) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).

but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...

I was thinking he would crash using a botnet.

Graet

vip

Activity: 980

Merit: 1001

not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)( Cool

) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).

but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...

bitcoiners

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Read though this whole thing and all I can say is the OP is such a man-child.

Wow dude, grow up.

"Someone hurt my feelings. Now I'm going to F up everyone's hard work. sniffle"

Get a life.

Litecoin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Yeah, changing the story. Next week we'll be hearing stories how he/she was testing the network. LOL. Cheesy

Get on the ShortBus with Bulanula. Cheesy

...and leave the pools alone. Just wasting our time.

The Koolio

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Minds are like parachutes they work best when open

Quote from: bitlane on July 24, 2012, 11:37:20 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit.

~BCX~

Looks to me that you have conceded to the fact that you don't have a hope in hell of a 51% attack and are changing your tune slightly here....

So which is it ? a 51% attack or simply an attempt to drive up difficulty ?

if you are unable to perform a fork and 51% attack, then the WORST you could do is double difficulty (for a VERY short time, till you go broke) and the nice thing about Litecoin is the FAST block Rate and Retarget times.

This is still a joke to me...lol

again bitlane +1... talking sense

bitlane

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

I heart thebaron

Quote from: ?? on ??

I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit.

~BCX~

Looks to me that you have conceded to the fact that you don't have a hope in hell of a 51% attack and are changing your tune slightly here....

So which is it ? a 51% attack or simply an attempt to drive up difficulty ?

if you are unable to perform a fork and 51% attack, then the WORST you could do is double difficulty (for a VERY short time, till you go broke) and the nice thing about Litecoin is the FAST block Rate and Retarget times.

This is still a joke to me...lol

ohforf

sr. member

Activity: 327

Merit: 250

we are legion

@ BitcoinEXpress
You, my Friend, are an Asshole.

Didn't your Mom teach you that its rude to break other Kid's toys ?

Come-from-Beyond

legendary

Activity: 2142

Merit: 1010

Newbie

Quote from: The Koolio on July 24, 2012, 11:04:42 AM

whats wrong with u? are u lacking in selfconfidence... just shouting for attention... such a tit... ur momma shud be ashamed

Let's stay on an abstract level without any personal insults. BCX gives us a favor doing free testing of LTC network.

The Koolio

hero member

Activity: 560

Merit: 500

Minds are like parachutes they work best when open

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: coblee on July 24, 2012, 03:55:34 AM

Of course. It's a lot harder than it was when Litecoin first came out. But you just have to DDoS all the pools, which we know you are capable of. Then while people are down, you throw a few hundred EC2 instances and a few hundred GPUs at it to fork a chain.

The best defense we have is to solo mine or use p2pool. That way a DDoS won't take all the miners down and it would require more resources to try to outpace the main network.

@Bitlane

You know I can and I will.

@Coblee

I love how everyone else is more of an expert than you on LTC and just don't have the faith.

The timing of the attack will be as follows.

It will take me a couple of days to coordinate the herders, test DDoS defense and build that many EC2's.
Looking for this Friday or early Saturday.The attack will last for several days and after a couple of resets, I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit. NMC hell all over again.

No coin that has been 51% attacked has ever recovered it confidence level.

~BCX~

whats wrong with u? are u lacking in selfconfidence... just shouting for attention... such a tit... ur momma shud be ashamed

Litecoin

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: Fiyasko on July 24, 2012, 10:13:53 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: disclaimer201 on July 24, 2012, 02:24:54 AM

51%ing is not a challenge. It's undermining the safety of the network. Cryptocurrencies have enough trouble catching on as it is, and here comes an asshole who has nothing better to do than to challenge to fuck it up. In cyrptocircles this is a serious crime. It's the ultimate crime. Scammer tag should be applied just for this statement.Of course I hope you fail and lose tons of money.

Not too familiar with my success rates on hitting alt chains are you?

I would be a scammer if I made a promise and didn't deliver, I will.

Sadly I actually protected LTC in the early days with a huge amount of hash power to fend off 51% attacks by the Solidcoin crew. Over the course of the last year I've bought a couple thousand BTC of LTC to bump it up ahead of SC and keep prices stable.

But hey, looks like the LTC community needs an attitude adjustment.

~BCX~

DO ITTTT!!!!!

Yeah, do it! I hope you are not running away and coming back with all sorts of excuses.
Put your resources where your mouth is! Get it done!

Fiyasko

legendary

Activity: 1428

Merit: 1001

Okey Dokey Lokey

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: disclaimer201 on July 24, 2012, 02:24:54 AM

51%ing is not a challenge. It's undermining the safety of the network. Cryptocurrencies have enough trouble catching on as it is, and here comes an asshole who has nothing better to do than to challenge to fuck it up. In cyrptocircles this is a serious crime. It's the ultimate crime. Scammer tag should be applied just for this statement.Of course I hope you fail and lose tons of money.

Not too familiar with my success rates on hitting alt chains are you?

I would be a scammer if I made a promise and didn't deliver, I will.

Sadly I actually protected LTC in the early days with a huge amount of hash power to fend off 51% attacks by the Solidcoin crew. Over the course of the last year I've bought a couple thousand BTC of LTC to bump it up ahead of SC and keep prices stable.

But hey, looks like the LTC community needs an attitude adjustment.

~BCX~

DO ITTTT!!!!! Mwhahahahaaa!
I think it would be Good For The World if his 51% attack succeds.
It will proove that it can happen to bitcoin, And it will proove that "I can kill all your monies"

Fwiw Im not aware of any 51% attack that Ever worked = all bark no bite

BlackBison

sr. member

Activity: 250

Merit: 250

last chance to buy before we have ignition..

Bitcoin Oz

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 500

Wat

Quote from: Litecoin on July 24, 2012, 07:29:03 AM

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on July 24, 2012, 02:11:27 AM

@Coblee

This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.

The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.

Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....

This is fair warning to all.

Challenge accepted.

~BCX~

All I can say is...
The lack of attention disorder is related to autism. The disorder is common and creates problems for the community and BitcoinEXpress.
People like BCX with a lack of attention disorder are continuously restless and impulsive. You should go and find help.
When you ruin something that others have built, how does it make you feel? Proud? Like you achieved something?
Go and do something nice, decorate your house, have kids, have fun and be happy.
If you really think that you are doing the right thing. Then get a move on!

Having Austism is not an excuse to be an asshole

Topic: deleted - page 10. (Read 22111 times)