Topic: deleted - page 9. (Read 22118 times)
This thread has turned into personal attacks. Can we please get back on topic and stop calling each other "fags" and referring to one another "penises".
Why would he be in legal trouble for a 51% attack? Luke had some fun and was not sent to a compulsory rectum treatment facility IIRC.
Unless he DDoSes a pool (remember LOIC script-kiddie users who got arrested) I don't see a reason to take such serious measures.
Unless he DDoSes a pool (remember LOIC script-kiddie users who got arrested) I don't see a reason to take such serious measures.
If few shit birds in BTC-E can get you so worked up, you must be the weakest and most pathetic creature ever existed. LOL!
BCX, use your moms permanent marker and write this on your forehead:
BCX, use your moms permanent marker and write this on your forehead:
~L~
I oppose these suggestions of using the law to stop BCX, especially arresting her. Are we going to cry to daddy every time someone doesn't play fair? What does that say about cryptocoin security, or its viability as a replacement for government-run currencies? Would you rather wait until the banks come after us and the cops are on their side?
As for DDoSing pools, GREAT! Stop using big pools already!
This is a free market, bitches. Either pay for your own security or make room for someone who does. If I were a Litecoin holder, I would start a fundraiser to send really high transaction fees this weekend.
As for DDoSing pools, GREAT! Stop using big pools already!
This is a free market, bitches. Either pay for your own security or make room for someone who does. If I were a Litecoin holder, I would start a fundraiser to send really high transaction fees this weekend.
LOL, there isn't anything illegal about deploying hashrate in excess of 50.1%. It's not my fault that that the flaw even exist.
~BCX~
So then do it. Stop talking as it's cheap. Let's see action.
Oh. eek. Big mighty bitcoin miner no likey litecoins and wanna kill 'em.
Yeah - good luck undermining the confidence in litecoin. Asshat.
Just like any other so-called "terrorist" - you suck at your job BCX. No one is the least bit scared that your attack will matter.
We await the lulz, fool - prepare to be separated from your money.
I hope you get luke to separate himself from his money too.
Yeah - good luck undermining the confidence in litecoin. Asshat.
Just like any other so-called "terrorist" - you suck at your job BCX. No one is the least bit scared that your attack will matter.
We await the lulz, fool - prepare to be separated from your money.
I hope you get luke to separate himself from his money too.
have a nice day 
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Einstein
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Einstein
I don't know why nobody has reported you to the feds. This is some bullshit, and you're fucked in the head! kthxbai!
This guy will testify at your trial... LOL....
Your petition has douch bag written all over it..... Do you believe all the shit you read online?
You bring shame to the number 420..... (doucher)
He speaks so formaly...as if though he were a mature adult. But his actions, does he not realise how immature his actions are?!?!
Is humanity capable of producing such stupidity!!!!
Oh yah, it is. Isn't this such a great world we live in.
Is humanity capable of producing such stupidity!!!!
Oh yah, it is. Isn't this such a great world we live in.
Lulz. Lookz at what I made:
http://www.change.org/petitions/bitcoinexpress-have-him-arrested
http://www.change.org/petitions/bitcoinexpress-have-him-arrested
It might be a catch 22.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
LTC isn't getting destroyed. The price may crash temporarily but that just enriches me in the long run as I'll just stop mining and start buying from all the BTC I've all ready made. Not to mention there are big names in BTC heavily invested in LTC already. It's not going anywhere.
I will take it personally though. I will go after those who willingly try to destroy my investments. He better not be in the US or any of his "help" better not be. That's all I have to say.
But is your "investment" worth anything if it turns out there is a serious flaw (hypothetical) that renders LTC nonviable? If there is a flaw in the core protocol of LTC, wasn't the damage "done" by the creators of LTC? In that case BTCXpress is just the messenger.
IMHO cryptocurrencies should be proof against the whims of one Apple employee.
I understand the controversy, but succeed or fail, this attempt will be good for us. If he breaks it then it's better him than a crook. If he fails we can all have more confidence that our money is secure.
If he does ddos that does make him a crook.
I understand the controversy, but succeed or fail, this attempt will be good for us. If he breaks it then it's better him than a crook. If he fails we can all have more confidence that our money is secure.
If he does ddos that does make him a crook.
Why not pull off some double-spends while you're at it? Send LTC to the exchanges, sell for BTC or USD, mine some blocks spending it back to yourself... you might as well take out all the bids.
Dear BCX,
we have lots of nice people here. As we can see, you are just wasting your time and won't do any good.
If you have hit your "Stress-Meter" limiter, we understand. Bad monkeys are jumping on your brain and you are losing it.
Maybe we should buy you a box of chocolates and let you cool down...
How's that?
we have lots of nice people here. As we can see, you are just wasting your time and won't do any good.
If you have hit your "Stress-Meter" limiter, we understand. Bad monkeys are jumping on your brain and you are losing it.
Maybe we should buy you a box of chocolates and let you cool down...
How's that?
I understand the controversy, but succeed or fail, this attempt will be good for us. If he breaks it then it's better him than a crook. If he fails we can all have more confidence that our money is secure.
Looking for this Friday or early Saturday.The attack will last for several days and after a couple of resets, I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit. NMC hell all over again.
That's inaccurate: the Litecoin retarget window is 3.5 days, unlike Bitcoin/Namecoin 14 days, so if the difficulty shoots up then it should take 4x less time (compared to what happened with Namecoin) to return to normal.
It might be a catch 22.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
LTC isn't getting destroyed. The price may crash temporarily but that just enriches me in the long run as I'll just stop mining and start buying from all the BTC I've all ready made. Not to mention there are big names in BTC heavily invested in LTC already. It's not going anywhere.
I will take it personally though. I will go after those who willingly try to destroy my investments. He better not be in the US or any of his "help" better not be. That's all I have to say.
It might be a catch 22.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
If BCX succeeds and destroys Litecoin, then good luck proving damages. The coin was not viable and therefore without value.
If BCX fails, no damage occurs and thus no plane ticket to Gitmo from our jackboots.
P.S. no wonder SoiledCoin development ground to a halt, Groinhunter spends all his time here trolling threads instead of coding.
not sure of the exact methods planned but attacking peoples computers is illegal in many countries
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(
) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).
but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...
http://www.technicallylegal.org/the-legality-of-denial-of-service-attacks/ relates to the US
one snippet
In terms of criminal violations, there’s the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (the “CFAA”), which prohibits a person from “knowingly caus[ing] the transmission of a program, information code, or command, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally causes damages without authorization to a protected computer” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(a)(5)(A)). The requisite “damage” element under the CFAA is “any impairment to the integrity or availability of data, a program, a system, or information” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(
) and a “protected computer” is defined as a computer “which is used in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, including a computer located outside the United States that is used in a manner that affects interstate or foreign commerce or communication” (see 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)(B)).but ppl that get upset over what goes on in a shoutbox probably think that wont relate to them...
Did BCX ever claim to be a US citizen, or even live there ?
If he didn't, how relevant is all that verbiage ?
Very relevant. If I get hit by a ddos, I will turn it over to the feds. And yes unless he lives in IRAN he will be brought to the US on those charges.
Good Luck though.
You vastly over-estimated the leverage the US
actually has over other sovereign nations.
If the nation in question is the UK, then yes, perhaps,
they having been the poodle on the US lap for quite
a while now. Not so for the rest of the world.
Of course, most likely no one will be dragged from one country to another cause he/she attacked pools.
If your pool is located in the US and the attacker is located in the EU, the authorities will work together but its going to be hell of a long process.
Jump to: