If you don't beleive in having a system of government (to build roads, regulate enviromental pollution, capture murderers, ect) then I can not continue this debate with you or anyone who holds this extreme viewpoint.
Have fun with collapsing bridges, local rivers on fire, and every serial killer alive walking free. A world without government would last a day before we decend into primative killing and pollution. Shiting in buckets and dying from basic wounds because of no sanitation or running plumbing (clean water) comes on week two. "Government is evil", really? No it is not. As one man once said "politics/government are how we make decisions without killing each other". Anarchy would be fun untill I put a bullet in your head because your wife is not sucking me off...
While I'm not going to suggest that anarchy is better or try to defend it, your description of it is not objective because it leaves out vigilantism and mob rule and assumes the worst outcome. For instance, local people can put together a posse to pursue and disable a murderer. Anarchy does not rule out people working together or cooperating to accomplish goals. It just bars a central authority as having dominion over the masses, if I understand it correctly.
In theory, if everyone had that same gun that you imagine you having to command control over a husband and wife, you might be a bit more concerned about the outcome of putting a bullet in anyone. But, in a society where only a fraction of the people are armed because a central authority stripped the populace of defence, you might be more free to commit your hostilities.
This is not to say that anarchy will have a better outcome. It is just presumptuous to conclude the worst possible outcome. It is also presumptuous to say that people are safe because there is government. Why does the murder rate increase as population density increases even though police can arrive more quickly?
"From 1976 to 1998 changes in homicide trends were driven by changes
in the number of homicides in large American cities (defined as cities
with populations of 100,000 or more). Over half of the homicides
during this period occurred in large cities; almost a quarter of the
homicides occurred in cities with a population of more than 1 million.
Small cities are defined as those with a population of less than 100,000."
source:
http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ascii/usrv98.txtIn the short term (the next 15 minutes), there is very little difference between living in a rural area and anarchy because the only one who can defend your home is you and your family.