Wenn das was immer noch in die Alts fliesst die Flussrichtung ändert wirds auf jedem Fall was mit den 20k
Ich denke aber nach wie vor, dass die Tethersache gehörig stinkt und das eine ausreichend schlechte Nachricht wäre um einen ordentlichen Dip auszulösen und falls was dran wäre auch ein ordentlicher Anteil des Wachstums auf "Fiat-Bitcoin" basieren würde und wenn das entweicht auch einige Unterstützungslinien fallen würden.
Hier hat sich mal endlich jemand des Themas wissenschaftlich angenommen und es statistisch untersucht. Meine Statistikkenntnisse sind leider zu eingerostet um das wirklich nachvollziehen zu können. Aber hier ist die Conclusion:
Conclusion
What have we established here? At first, it may seem that regular market forces are bidding the price of Bitcoin higher. However, when looking at it in more detail, why is it that one exchange has increased their total share of daily Bitcoin trade volumes over the past six months? Additionally, why is it that as total trade volume rises between the three statistically significant exchanges, only one can contribute towards the bidding up of Bitcoin price, but the other two contribute towards the decrease of Bitcoin prices? The reason for this could potentially be due to fraudulent activity. As shown in theory, and with statistical evidence, we see that trading volume of Tether may artificially increase the total trading volume of Bitcoin on the Bitfinex exchange, thus artificially raising the price of Bitcoin. If a financial crisis or a recession is upon us, then the future of Bitcoin and Tether is in jeopardy due to the negligence of not the Bitcoin system, but rather a few players are artificially bidding up the price for their unfair gains.
Bitcoin and its ability to be an independent monetary system should be welcomed in the long term. I believe that Bitcoin will have the ability to solve monetary issues in a decentralized manner compared to how central banks handle monetary matters. Historically, decentralized free-banking monetary systems have proven to be more stable than today’s monetary policies, as described by free bankers like George Selgin (an influence of mine). Therefore, this is not an article which criticizes Bitcoin in the long term, but instead shows that the current charge for Bitcoin is potentially artificial. Thus, I continue to hold the belief that in the short term, Bitcoin is a bubble, however, in the long term, Bitcoin is the future of monetary transactions.
Quelle:
https://beinglibertarian.com/bitcoin-subjected-fraud/ 
