Pages:
Author

Topic: DESCROW SECURE CROWDFUNDING PLATFORM - page 49. (Read 36092 times)

copper member
Activity: 378
Merit: 112
November 18, 2017, 11:56:14 AM
Good. In this case, can investors select participants of this platform by voting? Or can they offer their candidates for consideration and voting?
I thought about the already existing site with the participants who already have a rating. For example, it is from habrahabr.ru. It will be the third independent expert who will want to value his reputation
I think investors will not be able to choose the composition of experts. Unless to put restrictions on participation on the minimum rating for voting was qualified. All the parts of this system are independent and balanced in this sense.
In this case, it should be really authoritative participants who have long proven themselves on the positive side and have a good rating.
sr. member
Activity: 686
Merit: 251
I'm investigating Crypto Projects
November 18, 2017, 10:28:28 AM
I like this project's idea. It has long been time to remove centralization from the sphere of finance. This will allow developing such projects as yours and many others that help improve people's lives
Yes
Decentralization is capable of revolutionizing the storage and exchange of assets. Decentralized markets have no national borders — they allow users from all over theworld to freely interact with each other. Decentralization improves robustness against random errors, as well as against attacks and collusion attempts by individual participants Removal of intermediary parties helps to significantly simplify and speed up interactions between users.
As can be seen from the appearance of this project, regulators are still necessary. But not as terrible as traditional governments and officials. Self-regulation is our choice, I wish the project good luck.

What is those with power don't give a shit about your self regulation and tell you what to do by force?
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 100
the moon
November 18, 2017, 07:06:55 AM
I came to the conclusion that this ANTI-SCAM-ICO platform will work mainly with large ICO projects.
For small projects, it will not be in demand
I don't understand. What does it mean small, but what does big projects mean? What is a measure? , hardcape, softcape or the number of participating in projects...
i don't understand too, what is the difference between large and small project if the mechanism is the same for all
full member
Activity: 477
Merit: 102
Radix-The Decentralized Finance Protocol
November 15, 2017, 11:17:19 AM
This is about what has already been written above. Responsibility must be mutual. Devs is also very much invested in the project. Reputation, time, energy.
Yes, it is, but I did not see the devs answer. Or somewhere missed this moment? There are no details on this topic in the WP.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 111
vite
November 18, 2017, 06:39:48 AM

Maybe. Although if the team is strong and experienced, I do not think that third-party organizations need audit. Look at the opinion of the developers about this.
Lol man are ypu kiddin me? You can trust no one on crypto market. Audit is simple thing for every project. You cant trust in dev's words
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 629
November 15, 2017, 11:04:27 AM
How to be in this case: the reasons are real (force majeure in offline), but in fact do not have a relationship to the project?
This is about what has already been written above. Responsibility must be mutual. Devs is also very much invested in the project. Reputation, time, energy.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 111
vite
November 18, 2017, 05:27:32 AM
I love the idea of this project. But it take too long time for this project can have real product for people.  Undecided
I am totally agree with you. Token price cant rise without working product. Also its better for crypto word if DES will release their product as soon as posible
full member
Activity: 477
Merit: 102
Radix-The Decentralized Finance Protocol
November 15, 2017, 07:43:38 AM
let's imagine that i am investor, i own some project tokens and i decide to stop financing project. In WP i read "the investor is asked to fill out the form, where you need to specify the reason for your decision"

will be accepted the reason kinda "i want so" (like blonde  Grin) or i can even dont mention anything there?

Good joke) No. We need real reasons.
How to be in this case: the reasons are real (force majeure in offline), but in fact do not have a relationship to the project?
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
November 18, 2017, 05:02:28 AM
I love the idea of this project. But it take too long time for this project can have real product for people.  Undecided
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1951
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 15, 2017, 07:39:34 AM
I said that consideration since many people start talking about grail at any convenient opportunity. This is an excellent project for solving a specific problem. I see other promising moments in it, but they should be discussed and developed, and not shouting about the Grail.
Can you tell more about your thoughts? The project is under development, maybe devs will hear your opinion.
No problem. I already wrote about it. I think the ecosystem of the project is quite fit to receive money from third-party funds and private investors for consulting services. Since in fact a full audit of ICO will be carried out and this information will have great value.
copper member
Activity: 378
Merit: 112
November 18, 2017, 04:57:37 AM
Did I understand correctly among the many sources of information that some of the tokens can be stored on exchanges without access to the functionality of smart contracts for voting?
Here everything is decided just by the introduction into the process of experts or communities who will lead the project on the DES platform and will vote independently of any tokens and changing owners.
So how to solve the issue of organizing these experts? Which sources is from? And how can we be trusted to them?
I think It may be some organizations with a team of experts. I think there are such sources. But I can not name exact references  Undecided
No matter where. If this system itself is working, then the source of good specialists and experts will always be found
What kind of source can this be? Can you give some examples? And what can be the gaoanty for the rest of the participants in the fact that the experts will not be from interested groups that will be able to influence the voting process in someone's favor?
Good. In this case, can investors select participants of this platform by voting? Or can they offer their candidates for consideration and voting?
I thought about the already existing site with the participants who already have a rating. For example, it is from habrahabr.ru. It will be the third independent expert who will want to value his reputation
full member
Activity: 522
Merit: 101
November 15, 2017, 07:20:11 AM
I said that consideration since many people start talking about grail at any convenient opportunity. This is an excellent project for solving a specific problem. I see other promising moments in it, but they should be discussed and developed, and not shouting about the Grail.
Can you tell more about your thoughts? The project is under development, maybe devs will hear your opinion.
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
November 17, 2017, 02:27:18 PM
I like this project's idea. It has long been time to remove centralization from the sphere of finance. This will allow developing such projects as yours and many others that help improve people's lives
Yes
Decentralization is capable of revolutionizing the storage and exchange of assets. Decentralized markets have no national borders — they allow users from all over theworld to freely interact with each other. Decentralization improves robustness against random errors, as well as against attacks and collusion attempts by individual participants Removal of intermediary parties helps to significantly simplify and speed up interactions between users.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 629
November 15, 2017, 06:58:16 AM
I said that consideration since many people start talking about grail at any convenient opportunity. This is an excellent project for solving a specific problem. I see other promising moments in it, but they should be discussed and developed, and not shouting about the Grail.
Nowadays, any successful project that does at least something real is already becoming a grail. So I will follow this project with interest. There is still time to think before the ICO.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
November 17, 2017, 02:23:44 PM
I like this project's idea. It has long been time to remove centralization from the sphere of finance. This will allow developing such projects as yours and many others that help improve people's lives
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1951
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
November 15, 2017, 06:41:01 AM
In fact, this is the main function of the project. Even reflected in the title. Therefore, when solving this problem, the project will be super successful.
I said that consideration since many people start talking about grail at any convenient opportunity. This is an excellent project for solving a specific problem. I see other promising moments in it, but they should be discussed and developed, and not shouting about the Grail.
member
Activity: 121
Merit: 10
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 15
November 17, 2017, 01:07:11 PM
Making Escrow a third party is a good idea because it can be controlled and transparent. As we know, the ICO Industry is growing very fast. then Escrow can be utilized for the selection of scam projects are good and interesting. I think this is a good project.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
November 17, 2017, 01:03:17 PM
All types of measurement are interesting. But I meant projects where the number of participants is not great.
I still do not understand, it DES-project a universal platform that can be used for projects of all types, regardless of the number of participating.
What to do with the situation when the number of participants is small and the development team buys most of the tokens> 50.01% and using the majority votes in favor of themselves in the first stage of voting?
full member
Activity: 137
Merit: 100
November 17, 2017, 12:59:22 PM
All types of measurement are interesting. But I meant projects where the number of participants is not great.
I still do not understand, it DES-project a universal platform that can be used for projects of all types, regardless of the number of participating.
Pages:
Jump to: