I think that it does not make sense. The votes of investors and third parties will be taken into account.
What if investors are anonymous? Require authorization?
Topic: DESCROW SECURE CROWDFUNDING PLATFORM - page 48. (Read 36084 times)
Yes, it will be authorization.
Verification is most likely needed to invest in USD and other currencies. When you invest in crypto currency, confirmation is usually not necessary. But if the amount is large enough, then most likely there will be their own rules for confirming the identity.
As I understand from the WP investors will somehow be authorized. Otherwise, the whole logic of the decision-making process breaks down. It's unclear who is who. And who for whose interests votes.
In this case, all participants can track the transactions of each of them? I do not think that this will suit all investors, most of them will want to remain anonymous
This is not about transactions. They will of course be anonymous. But investors should vote on those projects in which they invested money, so somehow they should be authorized to vote for their projects, not for others.I think that it does not make sense. The votes of investors and third parties will be taken into account.
What if investors are anonymous? Require authorization?it´s sometimes better to be safe with KYC
Moreover, such a model is not laid in the self-development of the project. Just facing the difficulties the teams begin to think about it. But DES project will deprive them of this opportunity )
A good idea. Especially it is interesting because even a negative conclusion about the project can bring profit. If sufficient interested persons buy a newsletter.
The irony is that many consulting firms earn more than those companies that are consulting. So this kind of earnings can become the main one. Life is a little more complicated than such straightforward conclusions. Buterin violated the principles that was proclaimed by himself , but in fact the project was a success. But we will not go to offtop.
We will hope that this project will also take its own niche.
So how to solve the issue of organizing these experts? Which sources is from? And how can we be trusted to them?
If everything were simple, there would not be such platforms. Because there would be no need for them. Obviously, there is a problem and you confirmed this with your questions. I think that it does not make sense. The votes of investors and third parties will be taken into account.
What if investors are anonymous? Require authorization?
Cool info. Where did you get it?
And where can I see the video from these events?
Just checked their social networks. I think the video will be posted there when the event is over. And where can I see the video from these events?
I think that it does not make sense. The votes of investors and third parties will be taken into account.
What if investors are anonymous? Require authorization?
Descrow will participate in the blocking event R3.
On November 14-16, Descrow will take part in an international event that will be held by the R3 blockbuster consortium, which opened its representative office in Russia this fall. As part of the R3 visit to Moscow, a business breakfast for entrepreneurs and a two-day training seminar for developers will be held, and the Corda solution will be presented - a platform for managing financial obligations between various financial institutions.
Cool info. Where did you get it?On November 14-16, Descrow will take part in an international event that will be held by the R3 blockbuster consortium, which opened its representative office in Russia this fall. As part of the R3 visit to Moscow, a business breakfast for entrepreneurs and a two-day training seminar for developers will be held, and the Corda solution will be presented - a platform for managing financial obligations between various financial institutions.
And where can I see the video from these events?
hmm now i got it lol
first you work for a name, then the name works for you
For sure. For example, if in some project Buterin as a advisor? Can this porject be a scam? I think not. But if in the tam no names than you cant trust him first you work for a name, then the name works for you
I came to the conclusion that this ANTI-SCAM-ICO platform will work mainly with large ICO projects.
For small projects, it will not be in demand
Do you think a commission from small projects will not cover the costs of studying it? I think that those who will be engaged in this on an ongoing basis will be able to do this sometimes even free of charge to maintain their professional status and skills.For small projects, it will not be in demand
first you work for a name, then the name works for you
What to do with the situation when the number of participants is small and the development team buys most of the tokens> 50.01% and using the majority votes in favor of themselves in the first stage of voting?
It's would be in conflict with our corporate values and harmed our reputation. So we are intersted in transparency.
All types of measurement are interesting. But I meant projects where the number of participants is not great.
I still do not understand, it DES-project a universal platform that can be used for projects of all types, regardless of the number of participating. It's would be in conflict with our corporate values and harmed our reputation. So we are intersted in transparency.
Difference between big and small project is needed funds for developing. Small project no need 150k ETH like kyber for development their product. Just take a look at arbitrage crypto trader. Hard cap just 12k ETH. Nowadays its really small hardcap
but what's the difference, the platform will still work with both projects, small and big
The funds will be divided into several stages of delivery to the project, it is a very good idea. Avoid many projects into enough money and the slow progress, on the other hand to help item company can make reasonable planning, rather than only for money! 
i don't understand too, what is the difference between large and small project if the mechanism is the same for all
No problem. I already wrote about it. I think the ecosystem of the project is quite fit to receive money from third-party funds and private investors for consulting services. Since in fact a full audit of ICO will be carried out and this information will have great value.
A good idea. Especially it is interesting because even a negative conclusion about the project can bring profit. If sufficient interested persons buy a newsletter. What is those with power don't give a shit about your self regulation and tell you what to do by force?
it is, but no one has yet been able to conquer the world completelyinternet connects people around the world
Jump to: