I have been saying this for quite sometime. The developers and the promoters need to show respect for bounty hunters. For just 0.5% or 1% of the total pool, the bounty hunters are doing the hard work to promote these projects. And if the project becomes a success, then the bounty hunter may receive $10 or $20 worth of tokens, while the promoters may each receive tokens worth millions of USD.
This scenario will succeed if the project is really good. The dev team should also determine the right marketing strategy. If indeed they are doubtful and difficult to form market trust, they should give another reward, for example in BTC or USDT. It could also compile a strategy by giving weekly rewards, even if it is still difficult, please do the payment in several stages, for example once a month, but it was informed from the beginning. So that the bounty hunter is not disappointed. Often, when a product is successful in a high-priced market, the bounty hunter is forgotten and there is drama, changes in payments begin, delays, rewards are locked, etc. 
Topic: Devs please have some respect - page 2. (Read 968 times)
I have been saying this for quite sometime. The developers and the promoters need to show respect for bounty hunters. For just 0.5% or 1% of the total pool, the bounty hunters are doing the hard work to promote these projects. And if the project becomes a success, then the bounty hunter may receive $10 or $20 worth of tokens, while the promoters may each receive tokens worth millions of USD.
Discount is a way of attracting potential investor especially with the present state of the market. Every developer are trying everything possible to attract investors. Blaming bounty hunters is a way of escaping from the wrath of investors in the case of price dumb.
This is what usually happens and they who got discounts are the one who normally sells to profit. The bounty hunters don't even get the tokens yet as their rewards while the price hits the sediment already so why blame the bounty hunters? Blaming is easy and gets them off the hook with just a word of it when the fact is that these developers also are the ones dumping the first.
Discount is a way of attracting potential investor especially with the present state of the market. Every developer are trying everything possible to attract investors. Blaming bounty hunters is a way of escaping from the wrath of investors in the case of price dumb.
Lol I'm happy that someone finally took out the time to address this issue the way it's meant to be.
I was seeing some topics on this lately. The op was asking whether we should blame the investors or the bounty hunters for a failed project.
I just don't see why we should be blaming the bounty hunters, because they have never done anything wrong by helping to push the project. When developers create a project, their reason for calling on bounty hunters is to help push that project and nothing else. People needs to understand that bounty hunters are not investors. They have done their part of the work and you can't tie them down forever and believing that will make your project to grow. Wrong.
I was seeing some topics on this lately. The op was asking whether we should blame the investors or the bounty hunters for a failed project.
I just don't see why we should be blaming the bounty hunters, because they have never done anything wrong by helping to push the project. When developers create a project, their reason for calling on bounty hunters is to help push that project and nothing else. People needs to understand that bounty hunters are not investors. They have done their part of the work and you can't tie them down forever and believing that will make your project to grow. Wrong.
Team are responsible for the value of their coin, if they give them away easily to attract investors the end result will be pretty bad, I expect many developers to have learned by now because we have so many examples of projects that took this unfavorable path in the past
Lame people blame people, if the team are pro thy don't have to blame anything for their failure, instead they will give in more effort to fix this up and that's what I called a good team, today new devs with no pro history build tokens and steal others whitepaper to complete their lame projects, it's always money here money there, we just need to me extra careful
when they can use hunter as a reason why not, it applies to devs who have bad projects and don't have definite development on their projects.
while good projects they will continue to focus and not blame any party for the failure / decline in their project performance.
while good projects they will continue to focus and not blame any party for the failure / decline in their project performance.
Well we can't avoid that kind of mindset.
Some devs might think of bounty hunters as some hungry people to feed because they didn't even invest any single quarter into their project aside from time that's why bounty hunters are the ones being blamed commonly in the first place unlike investors of the project itself.
Some devs might think of bounty hunters as some hungry people to feed because they didn't even invest any single quarter into their project aside from time that's why bounty hunters are the ones being blamed commonly in the first place unlike investors of the project itself.
It's a big sign, any project that throws blame on bounty hunter means they don't know what they are doing, I advise to dump such project instantly and move to better one who can actually face any situation either good or bad
It seems developers don't know what they are doing, many of them that put blames on bounty hunters for price dump , they must be high on drugs or something, this is just simple arithmetic
A devs create a coin with 100 million supply
He decide to do IEO with 50 million coins of the supply
He decide to do IEO at the price of 0.1$
But to attract investors he introduce a discount of 0.05$
He was lucky to see many investors investing in the project even when he chooses not so good exchange
And price surge over 3.5$
Please tell me, how will investors hold the coins when they see gains that can take them years of holding to achieve???
Developers you are the main problem affecting your coins and tokens, bounty hunters only share up to 1% of your max supply, have some respect
A devs create a coin with 100 million supply
He decide to do IEO with 50 million coins of the supply
He decide to do IEO at the price of 0.1$
But to attract investors he introduce a discount of 0.05$
He was lucky to see many investors investing in the project even when he chooses not so good exchange
And price surge over 3.5$
Please tell me, how will investors hold the coins when they see gains that can take them years of holding to achieve???
Developers you are the main problem affecting your coins and tokens, bounty hunters only share up to 1% of your max supply, have some respect
Great points here,seems that Hunters has their defense attorney now here ,because all these years blames always goes to the Bounty hunters even if they have just received the payments after investors sold their tokens.
I think the best solution here?bounty hunters stop joining instead find their other way to make profits here in crypto because the Bounty Days are long gone now.
Developers needs to start taking their project very seriously, it's one reason why I don't promote projects that give away too many coins, it means there will be huge dump and the coin will lose value, this is call mismanagement
The problem is they didn't have a lot of skill to develop their projects they will be asking for the money while it can be done for free as long as people has enough skill to developer an innovative idea like satoshi did in the past. It's very difficult to change this perspective.
Bounty hunters are marketers who later will turn investors. I have personally held some altcoin I got from bounty, and even invest more on the project when I see how good the project is and that I got just small tokens from campaign. More so developers are suppose to give to hunters what won't have a bad impact on their market and it's the right of hunters to receive payment.
True! However, a lot of devs are doing the opposite thing. They reward bounty hunters at a lower rate than usual and expect them to follow along with their project. Once the project can't hit its target, they turn to blame us all. Personally, I don't usually feel comfortable working with people who have a bad work ethic like that lol!
I don't believe that devs don't know what they are doing, it's all a planned work right from the start, they have to put the blame on someone else, it's a part of their getaway plan, so they can atleast have some excuse if the unexpected happened
It seems developers don't know what they are doing, many of them that put blames on bounty hunters for price dump , they must be high on drugs or something, this is just simple arithmetic
It is not that they don't know what they are doing,actually they are expert on this thats why they can put blame to others while the truth is they already knew all of this from the very beginning.
They have Planned this long time ago so expected all the outcome but of course there must be something or someone to blame.
In this way legitimacy of their scam target is what people might see,and they can just run away without being pin pointed because Hunters is the one that makes sound guilty.
Now tell me,are the Dev really don't know things or it is You that need to make the thread just because of this "Simple Arithmetic".
Developers needs to start taking their project very seriously, it's one reason why I don't promote projects that give away too many coins, it means there will be huge dump and the coin will lose value, this is call mismanagement
Bounty hunters shares only 1% of project max supply and half of the max supply goes to investors, if dumps do occur this shows that bounty hunters aren't responsible for the dumps, 1% of max total supply is not enough to drag down token price
Bounty hunters are marketers who later will turn investors. I have personally held some altcoin I got from bounty, and even invest more on the project when I see how good the project is and that I got just small tokens from campaign. More so developers are suppose to give to hunters what won't have a bad impact on their market and it's the right of hunters to receive payment.
True! However, a lot of devs are doing the opposite thing. They reward bounty hunters at a lower rate than usual and expect them to follow along with their project. Once the project can't hit its target, they turn to blame us all. Personally, I don't usually feel comfortable working with people who have a bad work ethic like that lol! 
Blaming bounty hunters are just alibis to hide their incompetence because they don't accept the truth about the flaw of their own Tokenomics. but I think that the blame game is already irrelevant because many investors already know that. The project team cant use that alibis forever and it will vanish soon because of the ever-changing needs of the market and crypto investment needs.
Bounty hunters are marketers who later will turn investors. I have personally held some altcoin I got from bounty, and even invest more on the project when I see how good the project is and that I got just small tokens from campaign. More so developers are suppose to give to hunters what won't have a bad impact on their market and it's the right of hunters to receive payment.
Jump to: