The truth is bounty hunters discourages investors from keeping or holding their coins. The price flow or the coin price direction might be affected by bounty hunter's dumping. Now that we are close to a huge bull run, scenario might change. Remember this if Bitcoin is going up. Alts goes up too.
What? You really think that history will repeat itself? That a new bullrun will begin soon? That's very hard to believe, Bitcoin hit 10k and dropped back with hours, that's not a real sign of bullrun, remember how many times Bitcoin tried to surge over 9700$ before dropping? It seems Bitcoin is not fit for any bullrun for now, maybe coming year I'm not sure 
Topic: Devs please have some respect - page 4. (Read 988 times)
The truth is bounty hunters discourages investors from keeping or holding their coins. The price flow or the coin price direction might be affected by bounty hunter's dumping. Now that we are close to a huge bull run, scenario might change. Remember this if Bitcoin is going up. Alts goes up too.
If they don't do an ICO, then they have enough money to develop the project. And that money comes from private investors and Per-sale. Those are really good projects and have potential for development in this market
That's right, and usually projects like that are rarely found in this forum, because the average project in this forum is a project that makes ICO and IEO to get a supply of funds from investors, because they do not have enough funds to develop projects in a further direction. 
Developers aims is to attract millions of investors by all means, that's why they use attractive discounts, that's why I only trust projects that raised fund privately for their coins, it's hard seeing such projects lose value when trading starts, another one are projects that has NO ICO and No Premine, fundraising is now money making scheme for developers, nothing more.
It seems you are a little wrong in understanding about the project, because I have seen a number of successful projects and even the token project is listed on the top exchange by not making ICO, premine and fundraising.Developers aims is to attract millions of investors by all means, that's why they use attractive discounts, that's why I only trust projects that raised fund privately for their coins, it's hard seeing such projects lose value when trading starts, another one are projects that has NO ICO and No Premine, fundraising is now money making scheme for developers, nothing more.
It seems you are a little wrong in understanding about the project, because I have seen a number of successful projects and even the token project is listed on the top exchange by not making ICO, premine and fundraising. 
Hell yeah but even some developers were putting backdoor to make them able to unlock their pre-mined coin. I have seen some projects were using this kind of trick.
The dev will never hear you complain until you will talk with them all directly.
The dev will never hear you complain until you will talk with them all directly.
Isn't that a good thing too?
If they are blaming bounty hunters then, they just don't really understand how the market works.
It's a signal that should get away from that kind of project.
It won't do you any good at all.
You can save yourself a dollar for not buying their token.
If they are blaming bounty hunters then, they just don't really understand how the market works.
It's a signal that should get away from that kind of project.
It won't do you any good at all.
You can save yourself a dollar for not buying their token.
Most of the time the things about bounty and Prices are of concern of the marketing and Financial team than the developers. Anyway, the project team acts as one and should focus on creating a value for the token rather than making accusations against bounty participants for dumping the price as bounty token accounts for a small portion of the total supply.
Developers shouldn't put all the blame to bounty hunters, even they immediately sell off their rewards because they only received a small percentage of their total circulation supply. Developers should be put all the blame because they didn't make a precise plan to attract more investors, instead of using attractive discounts.
Can you share what project is this? Im thinking its only script right for an example how developer works on IEO coins? Cause your pricing is very confusing, like you said the price is $0.10 per coin but the developer will give discount at $0.45 per coin how it become a huge discount? Maybe you are jumble it and the price is 0.45 and the discounted price is 0.1, I dont know if Im correct on my assumption but is it?
Whats the problem with the developer actually? I dont see the fuss here or issue. Next time make your statement clear when you start a topic thread.
Whats the problem with the developer actually? I dont see the fuss here or issue. Next time make your statement clear when you start a topic thread.
Developers aims is to attract millions of investors by all means, that's why they use attractive discounts, that's why I only trust projects that raised fund privately for their coins, it's hard seeing such projects lose value when trading starts, another one are projects that has NO ICO and No Premine, fundraising is now money making scheme for developers, nothing more.
This is true in some ways, OP. All these greedy CEO's, project starters are what's making the crypto industry look bad, and make people and corporations shy away from the technology.
Imagine if we have a good image and people don't think of scam when they hear altcoins/blockchain/crypto, etc. That is possible, there are major key players like Nestle for example that are lining up because the technology is massive. We need to get the right people, the higher ones, to start the movement and adoption will go from there.
Imagine if we have a good image and people don't think of scam when they hear altcoins/blockchain/crypto, etc. That is possible, there are major key players like Nestle for example that are lining up because the technology is massive. We need to get the right people, the higher ones, to start the movement and adoption will go from there.
It seems developers don't know what they are doing, many of them that put blames on bounty hunters for price dump , they must be high on drugs or something, this is just simple arithmetic
A devs create a coin with 100 million supply
He decide to do IEO with 50 million coins of the supply
He decide to do IEO at the price of 0.1$
But to attract investors he introduce a discount of 0.05$
He was lucky to see many investors investing in the project even when he chooses not so good exchange
And price surge over 3.5$
Please tell me, how will investors hold the coins when they see gains that can take them years of holding to achieve???
Developers you are the main problem affecting your coins and tokens, bounty hunters only share up to 1% of your max supply, have some respect
A devs create a coin with 100 million supply
He decide to do IEO with 50 million coins of the supply
He decide to do IEO at the price of 0.1$
But to attract investors he introduce a discount of 0.05$
He was lucky to see many investors investing in the project even when he chooses not so good exchange
And price surge over 3.5$
Please tell me, how will investors hold the coins when they see gains that can take them years of holding to achieve???
Developers you are the main problem affecting your coins and tokens, bounty hunters only share up to 1% of your max supply, have some respect
Jump to: