Did you think ICO is necessary? - page 2.

sinta23

full member

Activity: 668

Merit: 100

DogData

Quote from: hisuka on September 27, 2018, 05:10:35 PM

Quote from: byteminr on September 27, 2018, 03:34:21 PM

I think ICO will change soon.
This is already happening. I think that now there are a lot less frivolus investors

Yes Ico must be changed, since we all know Ico’s has surrounds of scam. These must be change indeed for the benefits of the users or investors. Although, Ico’s is also important to collect funds on their project but needs to changes the process to prevent fraud.

we know that at the moment the development of ico is surrounded by fraud. so I think that the ICO should be changed, so that in the future it can soar, and the possibility of investors' interest will rise again, because the ICO has been changed.

ttking

member

Activity: 324

Merit: 10

I think that ICO is the best chance to get money easily, sure that it is not the 100% safe thing to deal with as risks are everywhere. To my mind, it is necessary to check whether ico is reliable

Dessy88

full member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 100

Vave.com

Quote from: Mkpez on September 18, 2018, 03:08:34 AM

Irrespective of problems encountered by crypto enthusiasts like fake icos, scammers and delay. I think ICO plays an important rule in execution of sound projects. So Without ICO, most coins find it difficult to raise funds to execute their project. Without ICO, coins or projects will find it difficult to advertise their project, without ICO, projects will find it difficult to reach the right audience, Etc.therefore I believe in ICO because it enable me to research, analyst and evaluate the potentials of that project. Do you also believe in ICO?

I also feel that way and I also believe ICO even though it cannot be denied that there are not a few ico who are just scams and scams but ico is very helpful in the project

hisuka

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 251

Quote from: byteminr on September 27, 2018, 03:34:21 PM

I think ICO will change soon.
This is already happening. I think that now there are a lot less frivolus investors

Yes Ico must be changed, since we all know Ico’s has surrounds of scam. These must be change indeed for the benefits of the users or investors. Although, Ico’s is also important to collect funds on their project but needs to changes the process to prevent fraud.

mrkavasaki

hero member

Activity: 888

Merit: 500

Quote from: blokceyin on September 27, 2018, 03:11:18 PM

Yeah, sometimes it is really necessary but sometimes really unnecessary. Also there is a new business model for starting up new projects by not doing an ICO, instead they are making weekly airdrops and listing the coin in a couple of exchanges for the early birds. I like this way very much.

That is, you find non-creative ICOs, blockchain will be futuristic and at present there are many companies and corporations are applying it to their work. ICOs are just projects that help speed things up

byteminr

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 256

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

I think ICO will change soon.
This is already happening. I think that now there are a lot less frivolus investors

Faeton

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 11

Yes, ICO projects are very necessary for the development and improvement of the crypto currency. Everyone who wants to contribute to the development of the Crypto-currency is allowed to conduct the ICO. Now, of course, there are a lot of scammers involved in this process, but at this stage from now on we will not go anywhere. Too large amounts of money that ICO teams collect collect and attract the attention of scammers. When the states begin to regulate the ICO process, which in any case will be, the number of fraudulent ICO projects will significantly decrease.

dewildance

full member

Activity: 546

Merit: 100

I don't call it necessary. But it is the good thing. It is helping all market development and grow. Coinmarketcap has already reached over 2K+ cryptocurrencies now. So market value is getting increase day by day with new coins/tokens. Some day natural selection will select some of it and money will be transferred the good ones.

Aptekary

member

Activity: 602

Merit: 10

Quote from: blokceyin on September 27, 2018, 03:11:18 PM

Yeah, sometimes it is really necessary but sometimes really unnecessary. Also there is a new business model for starting up new projects by not doing an ICO, instead they are making weekly airdrops and listing the coin in a couple of exchanges for the early birds. I like this way very much.

The fact is that there are a lot of interesting and promising projects on the ico market. Coins on the crypto-currency market are also quite a lot, which does not represent any interest for investors. But meanwhile there are a lot of promising and necessary projects.

blokceyin

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 11

Sound/Foley FX Design Service For Your ICO Videos

Yeah, sometimes it is really necessary but sometimes really unnecessary. Also there is a new business model for starting up new projects by not doing an ICO, instead they are making weekly airdrops and listing the coin in a couple of exchanges for the early birds. I like this way very much.

Alijiindahaus

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 11

Quote from: Pechalka on September 27, 2018, 02:37:47 PM

In my opinion, the ICO just already has a good status in cryptocurrency and crypto develops by it. The market will crush without ICO, I think.

You understand that if the market is crushed, then no market ico companies will no longer be left out. He will suffer too. And very much. in any case I hope that large whales realize the negative from their artificial manipulation of the market and stop such actions ..

Pechalka

full member

Activity: 560

Merit: 100

In my opinion, the ICO just already has a good status in cryptocurrency and crypto develops by it. The market will crush without ICO, I think.

wnfakind

jr. member

Activity: 96

Merit: 1

I don’t see why they should be, majority are Failures and scams. There has been more successful projects that never needed the scam.c.o at all and have been successful. If you can find your own project or take the initiative yourself or have an actual community behind to build off of an exchange or a POW coin why even bother. Yes there have been a few successful ones but there is no need for them.

dagelan

member

Activity: 423

Merit: 10

BitbondSTO.com

I think in some projects, they chose to hold ico to get funding from investors to support and start their projects, but they must provide consequences and real profit prospects as a reciprocal

tins

hero member

Activity: 882

Merit: 500

Although many argue that the ICO market has died, however, the figures show the opposite, the ICO market is growing, in August 1818 $ 1.4 billion is called capital figure ICO, up 44% over the previous month. If it is not needed, why is it always growing

thefoex

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 101

Quote from: maianh09 on September 27, 2018, 01:55:02 PM

ICOs are not a necessity, but it is a way to attract investors as well as find new working capital flows for the Crypto market. Most ICOs often fail and cause investors to lose money, but losses make the market more liquid to help stabilize the market.

I think the ICO is needed for the purpose of introducing a new project, regardless of whether the project failed or succeeded. and ICOs are also needed for developers to get initial funds that will be used for development.

maianh09

full member

Activity: 672

Merit: 100

ICOs are not a necessity, but it is a way to attract investors as well as find new working capital flows for the Crypto market. Most ICOs often fail and cause investors to lose money, but losses make the market more liquid to help stabilize the market.

vavan37

full member

Activity: 283

Merit: 100

I think that ICO is needed. But there must be a structure that would control them. Precisely because there is no control there are so many scammers who want only to raise money. In general, without ICO, new projects will not be able to realize themselves

iASIC

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

AMA BCT

Quote from: Mkpez on September 18, 2018, 03:08:34 AM

Irrespective of problems encountered by crypto enthusiasts like fake icos, scammers and delay. I think ICO plays an important rule in execution of sound projects. So Without ICO, most coins find it difficult to raise funds to execute their project. Without ICO, coins or projects will find it difficult to advertise their project, without ICO, projects will find it difficult to reach the right audience, Etc.therefore I believe in ICO because it enable me to research, analyst and evaluate the potentials of that project. Do you also believe in ICO?

ICO is really needed for the present moment. Because now the market is bottoming out and it gives us more opportunities to grow better when the market rises. Although quality projects are not that great, I still believe in ICO projects in the future. Still waiting for a good project to be able to x3 properties. Grin

Sadyshagg

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

I'm not against ICO's in theory, because I believe a proper, structured fund raising solution in cooperation with blockchain technology is what the future holds for small to large size businesses.

Topic: Did you think ICO is necessary? - page 2. (Read 749 times)