Author

Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 1492. (Read 3058806 times)

member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Quote
// Maximum 400% adjustment...
        bnResult *= 200;

Is there something we are over looking here? With a much higher (actual) hash load will this adjustment act differently? What are the dangers of allowing very large diff swings like this?

Also, with a higher difficulty # like the 10-20 range we currently see, will we see any other phenomena that we can't test in the low hash test-net environment? Are we on the right path? What are your thoughts?

I think this might give miners a lot (as in, A LOT) of rejects as soon as the difficulty adjusts, unless your tests say otherwise.
Good point to consider! Thanks for the feedback! We will look at that more in depth.

Told you so.. Tongue

hey digibyte.  been mining at coinium and since the new diff took place the diff has been all over the place.  never consistant.  it will go from 8 to 9 then jump to 12 to 15 then back now to 7.  cna you explain as to why it does this.  and im getting much more rejects with this new diff change.  plz explain.

Difficulty jumps up and down dynamically but this should not be problem, it is to be expected from retarget each block, also right now there still large swings in net hashrate.
You can mine on PPLNS pool (such as digiforce.cc) which will smoothen rewards for you.
About reject rate, can you provide more data? I am both mining and administrating pool and i did not notice increase in rejects.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Quote
// Maximum 400% adjustment...
        bnResult *= 200;

Is there something we are over looking here? With a much higher (actual) hash load will this adjustment act differently? What are the dangers of allowing very large diff swings like this?

Also, with a higher difficulty # like the 10-20 range we currently see, will we see any other phenomena that we can't test in the low hash test-net environment? Are we on the right path? What are your thoughts?

I think this might give miners a lot (as in, A LOT) of rejects as soon as the difficulty adjusts, unless your tests say otherwise.
Good point to consider! Thanks for the feedback! We will look at that more in depth.

Told you so.. Tongue

hey digibyte.  been mining at coinium and since the new diff took place the diff has been all over the place.  never consistant.  it will go from 8 to 9 then jump to 12 to 15 then back now to 7.  cna you explain as to why it does this.  and im getting much more rejects with this new diff change.  plz explain.
full member
Activity: 479
Merit: 100
hey digibyte.  been mining at coinium and since the new diff took place the diff has been all over the place.  never consistant.  it will go from 8 to 9 then jump to 12 to 15 then back now to 7.  cna you explain as to why it does this.  and im getting much more rejects with this new diff change.  plz explain.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!
hey ,guys ,we need stable net hash ,how we can make it stable、?

We have no control over when someone adds or takes away their hash. The hash has been within a stable range.
sometimes 1500+,but sometimes 500+,that's ~~~~~~i dont know how to explain,feel it ~
There first few hours people were trying to figure out if there was an "xploit" they could take advantage of. The hash is more stable now verus the first few hours.

Check out the awesome chart on coinium to see: http://digi.coinium.org/

Before DigiShield took effect the same hash swings occurred, accept now we are not "stuck" for 2-3 hours and the difficulty adjusts within a couple blocks to hash swings both up and down.

We tested over 50 different configurations over the course of 5 days including the Kimoto Gravity Well and other approaches. The DigiShield configuration out performed all other configurations and is essentially a sum of what we learned and applied from other setups.

"xploit"...
That was a low hanging joke, wasn't it?  Wink

Don't tell xploited. Smiley

What do you think our next move should be. What do you as the community want to see happen with DigiByte next? In your opinion where should we focus our efforts this coming week now that we have resolved the multi pool issue and reduced the reward?

sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!
hey ,guys ,we need stable net hash ,how we can make it stable、?

We have no control over when someone adds or takes away their hash. The hash has been within a stable range.
sometimes 1500+,but sometimes 500+,that's ~~~~~~i dont know how to explain,feel it ~
There first few hours people were trying to figure out if there was an "xploit" they could take advantage of. The hash is more stable now verus the first few hours.

Check out the awesome chart on coinium to see: http://digi.coinium.org/

Before DigiShield took effect the same hash swings occurred, accept now we are not "stuck" for 2-3 hours and the difficulty adjusts within a couple blocks to hash swings both up and down.

We tested over 50 different configurations over the course of 5 days including the Kimoto Gravity Well and other approaches. The DigiShield configuration out performed all other configurations and is essentially a sum of what we learned and applied from other setups.

"xploit"...
That was a low hanging joke, wasn't it?  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!
hey ,guys ,we need stable net hash ,how we can make it stable、?

We have no control over when someone adds or takes away their hash. The hash has been within a stable range.
sometimes 1500+,but sometimes 500+,that's ~~~~~~i dont know how to explain,feel it ~
There first few hours people were trying to figure out if there was an "xploit" they could take advantage of. The hash is more stable now verus the first few hours.

Check out the awesome chart on coinium to see: http://digi.coinium.org/

Before DigiShield took effect the same hash swings occurred, accept now we are not "stuck" for 2-3 hours and the difficulty adjusts within a couple blocks to hash swings both up and down.

We tested over 50 different configurations over the course of 5 days including the Kimoto Gravity Well and other approaches. The DigiShield configuration out performed all other configurations and is essentially a sum of what we learned and applied from other setups.
member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!
hey ,guys ,we need stable net hash ,how we can make it stable、?

We have no control over when someone adds or takes away their hash. The hash has been within a stable range.
sometimes 1500+,but sometimes 500+,that's ~~~~~~i dont know how to explain,feel it ~
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!
hey ,guys ,we need stable net hash ,how we can make it stable、?

We have no control over when someone adds or takes away their hash. The hash has been within a stable range.
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!

Do we have a working explorer ?

These are up to date:

DigiByte Blockchain Explorers

member
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!
hey ,guys ,we need stable net hash ,how we can make it stable、?
sr. member
Activity: 335
Merit: 250
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!

Do we have a working explorer ?
legendary
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
Does anyone know who runs the Digi Tools block explorer? http://digitools.pw/chain/DigiByte

They need to update to DigiByte v2.0 DigiShield!
full member
Activity: 434
Merit: 100
The new logo is pretty sick btw.  Love it!
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1029
DigiByte has been added to P2Pool.org!

To view the pool stats visit:
http://p2pool.org:9022/

To mine DGB point your miner to:
http://p2pool.org:9022

Use your DGB wallet address as the username and anything for a password.

Example BFGMINER config:
bfgminer --scrypt -o http://p2pool.org:9022 -u address -p password

Happy Mining!
Good, we have a lot of nodes!
Somehow people must learn that p2pool is awesome and why!
Its the most fair, safe and easy way to mine a coin!
Especially for loyal miners is the most fair and profitable way to mine!


I thing a good explanation is the one above (it refers to another coin but its a good explanation)

http://www.reddit.com/r/reddCoin/comments/1xys08/p2pool_accept_nothing_less/

LETS GO PEOPLE!
legendary
Activity: 1140
Merit: 1000
The Real Jude Austin
DigiByte has been added to P2Pool.org!

To view the pool stats visit:
http://p2pool.org:9022/

To mine DGB point your miner to:
http://p2pool.org:9022

Use your DGB wallet address as the username and anything for a password.

Example BFGMINER config:
bfgminer --scrypt -o http://p2pool.org:9022 -u address -p password

Happy Mining!
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Check out my Troll POST!

[POLL] Which ALTCoin(s) do you HATE the MOST? (10 Votes)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=492354.20

I'm feeding 'em trolls Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 335
Merit: 250
All my gpu are pointed on the same address for a total of 6.5mh/s, no problem at all for those who are not use to it.
One address for all miners is enough.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
question about p2pool

I have several machines with cpu/gpu and the aggregation of all can go up to 5Mh/s , but each machine is just like 200/300kH/s

How does p2poll handle this? as i read it's best to have high hashrate, is it global directed to a unique wallet, or per worker ?

So far I'm on coinium and it is ok, but I like the p2pool approach.



Even if you are on different machines/rigs if you pointed on the same address you mine as a single worker.

I thought it conflicts. Correct me if im wrong.

Or wait

Ill try it out Smiley

edit: Confirmed. +1 Makishart.
Learnt something new, today... Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1029
question about p2pool

I have several machines with cpu/gpu and the aggregation of all can go up to 5Mh/s , but each machine is just like 200/300kH/s

How does p2poll handle this? as i read it's best to have high hashrate, is it global directed to a unique wallet, or per worker ?

So far I'm on coinium and it is ok, but I like the p2pool approach.



Even if you are on different machines/rigs if you pointed on the same address you mine as a single worker.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
question about p2pool

I have several machines with cpu/gpu and the aggregation of all can go up to 5Mh/s , but each machine is just like 200/300kH/s

How does p2poll handle this? as i read it's best to have high hashrate, is it global directed to a unique wallet, or per worker ?

So far I'm on coinium and it is ok, but I like the p2pool approach.


It is per wallet address.
If all of your workers are working from the same cgminer instance, i.e. from 1 wallet address.. then it'll be treated as 1 worker.

For your 300Kh/s+ Workers (per cgminer instance) .. i would recommend 'p2pool'
for under that value. MPOS is great.

Again, 300Kh/s is a guesstimate. We need someone to code a Min. required Hashrate Calculator for p2pools
Jump to: