pump is over. thanks for playing again.
I don't think so, it's just corrections because of BTC rise (check other alts).
+ coming segwit activation has positive influence on market
and if devs fix those silly small qt deficiencies it will definitely go up much higher lol.
everything should look perfectly right, like new grs, ltc etc ...
many thanks for the 6.14.2
LTC and DGB will see positive gains because of segwit and being on Poloniex , the exchange with the most traded bitcoin. Other coin like grs not on Poloniex will never get anywhere in value.
I was told by insiders with more btc then most of you can dream of that dgb will be going over 100 soon.
Price is the only thing it will help. Arguably, price is all that matters. Segwit's one technical merit of TX malleability will not outweigh the burden of the rest of the technical debt and 30,000+ lines of bullshit code it brings along. Additionally, the fix will be for segwit tx's only, and you can say goodbye to normal tx's when segwit is here.
DGB was once my favorite for its scaling innovations, speed, and lack of politics. Can't wait to dump and be done with this nonsense. Thanks for the heads up. I think it will hit 200+ this time. We will see. Keep me updated.
I know the Gulden lead developer left out segwit on purpose(after the codebase update) as he had some reservations about it, instead they spent the time on revamping the wallet and adding new innovative features. I am sure digibyte has a plan and I am still heavily invested but if bitcoin decide not to go with Segwit and dgb moves onto Segwit , can it be rolled back and only have normal tx's ?
Absolutely not.
From
http://www.deadalnix.me/2016/10/17/segwit-is-not-great/ (this is a good read btw)
"Transaction malleability
The primary reason SegWit was created is to solve transaction malleability. Currently, it is possible to modify a transaction in such a way that its id changes, but the transaction remains valid. This is an issue for various reasons that are fairly technical, but it is indeed worth fixing.
To do so, SegWit effectively creates a new transaction format which doesn’t suffer from the problem. However, the constraint is that the new format must fit in the old one. For this reason, anyone can spend transaction are created, and all transaction have an empty signature where none is needed.
Overall, this waste space and makes the transaction format bigger and more complex than it needs to be."
Another good read
http://www.wallstreettechnologist.com/2016/12/03/core-segwit-you-need-to-read-this/ (live site is currently down)
https://archive.fo/ZnPmFSo if DGB decide to move away from segwit, it's game over. I'm sure there will be exploits either way. Good luck.
