Author

Topic: ★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit - page 551. (Read 3059029 times)

legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
What I acknowledge is that sha ASIC miners are more efficient; they were designed to be and simply would not exist if they were not. I do not dispute this fact!
 
What I was trying to get across was that although, they have this advantage, sha miners can only achieve 20% of the blocks created on DigiByte. This means that they are in competition with the other sha miners and not the other algorithms!

I have no interest in subverting this thread, I would have thought that was obvious but apparently not. What I thought I was doing was offering healthy debate; I always consider the possibility of being wrong, after all I’m only human. What I get for it is abuse, I don’t like this current situation any more than anyone else. Maybe you would all be happier if I just popped in from time to time and said things like MOON! Well forget that, leave me on ignore. I know HR would currently like me to just go fms and I’m disappointed he has taken this stance, I used to really respect the guy but respect is a two way thing.

So sorry everyone for the mess but I can only keep my own behavior in check!
full member
Activity: 276
Merit: 101
I've always been surprised on how friendly and helpful the Digibyte community has been... but it seems each man has his limits...
Agreed, this pumper is annoying and is clearly manipulating Digibyte down at the moment, let him, means cheaper DGB for all of us and he'll will need to let her fly anyway... hell, she might even breakout without him as Digibyte is getting more and more attention with traders nowadays.

Anyway, Digibyte dev team and community are a unique group, almost never tainted by FUD or inner fighting crap... let's keep it this way!

Thanks! Greatly appreciated, we all try our best to form a positive image around DGB Smiley

Why to much block SHA256 on Node Stratum Pool pending?
Yep, there are some big payouts waiting to happen there on digihash pool! I would have thought it would have been pushed out by now as it was reported yesterday but I have total confidence it will be eventually. 


Yeah.. Still waiting and nothing from the devs. 



I will ask Jared for you.

Seriously guys? PM! Get this negativity off the forum.

Yes please this negativity is unnecessary, can both HR and Jumbley please make sure to continue their discussion off this thread.

HR and Jumbley your both ignored.

As you have both been told, take it to PM.
hero member
Activity: 517
Merit: 500
aka alaniz
I've always been surprised on how friendly and helpful the Digibyte community has been... but it seems each man has his limits...
Agreed, this pumper is annoying and is clearly manipulating Digibyte down at the moment, let him, means cheaper DGB for all of us and he'll will need to let her fly anyway... hell, she might even breakout without him as Digibyte is getting more and more attention with traders nowadays.

Anyway, Digibyte dev team and community are a unique group, almost never tainted by FUD or inner fighting crap... let's keep it this way!

Thanks! Greatly appreciated, we all try our best to form a positive image around DGB Smiley

Why to much block SHA256 on Node Stratum Pool pending?
Yep, there are some big payouts waiting to happen there on digihash pool! I would have thought it would have been pushed out by now as it was reported yesterday but I have total confidence it will be eventually. 


Yeah.. Still waiting and nothing from the devs. 

I will ask Jared for you.

Seriously guys? PM! Get this negativity off the forum.

Yes please this negativity is unnecessary, can both HR and Jumbley please make sure to continue their discussion off this thread.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
There is not a set formula for mining profitability.  I thought your analysis was interesting HR.  However, it didn't match my real world data using scrypt ASIC.  Mining can't be analyzed as an independent activity from trading or from a larger systemic approach to investing, supporting, and engaging with DGB.  I spent a significant amount of money on my current ASIC rig.  Around the time it was delivered, the support forums for the company were filled with people saying that it could never be profitable.  Here I am, 2 calendar years later, and I'm still theoretically in profits mining DGB.  I say theoretically because I don't sell to pay for operating costs.

Your work with support and analysis is fantastic.  It is a huge benefit to have you working on behalf of DGB.

To directly address the points in your previous post ... GPU (and CPU) can be profitable.  Clearly it's not the best choice if you try to compete directly with ASIC.  But, it can squeak out a a profit with the non-ASIC algorithms when it is done with care and thought in the process of mining DGB.  ASIC mining is not necessarily bad.  Neither is GPU or CPU necessarily good.  ASICs are a part of our world.

At DGB we have a great diversity of mining and support within our community.  The diversity adds value to DGB.

We all get frustrated sometimes.  It happened to me from December through January.  I just felt like no matter what I wrote here or tried I was pissing into the wind.  I was disheartened, but it wasn't about DGB.

We are here as a DigiByte community to support and encourage and grow.  Everyone here contributes and adds value to our community.  We disagree.  We agree.  We argue.  We build.  We develop.  We support.  We are all committed to the success of DGB.  I think it's great that we have seen some new members of the community expressing interest in mining and supporting DGB.  To all the new members of our community ... we are here to help you.  DigiByte has a bright future.  I believe we will have plenty of challenges on the way, but we'll get there.

The analysis was done using The Blocks Factory data using national average US electricty costs and can be confirmed by anyone with basic math skils wishing to do so. (You can pass that on to Jombley so he does't feel hurt.) The results show that SHA mining is profitable at current prices (on an ex-hardware investment basis) and the clear implication is that GPU mining could be profitable if SHA were NOT present since price would adjust accordingly.

Nice to see someone actually addressing the matter head on and logically BTW. :-)


Another possibility to make the playing field even leveler so as to increase relative profitability between algos, and thereby further incentive "average guy" mining and a more widely distributed and secure network in turn, would be to reduce SHA payouts by 75% and scrypt by 25%.

Everything would truly be equal then, and those beloved SHA miners would still be a part of the "community", BUT WITHOUT SUBSIDIZED FAVORITISM!

Anyone have a problem with the concept of equal opportunity? Especially considering it's even in DGB's best interest?

Doubters and out of hand disqualifiers, confirm the numbers on your own, or if you're too lazy, just ask the Devs if those payout differences are correct or not - they should know . . . and if they don't, it's high time they did!

Again, the raw data is there for anyone with the courage to look and the ability to do basic math. There's no subjectivity involved, much less mystery.

I've crunched the numbers, partly because I was curious, and partly because I'm a nice guy who wants to lend a hand. Wink

At current rewards, in order to mine 5000 DGB with modern SHA-256 ASIC equipment, you'll need ~2.4 kWh. With modern Scrypt ASIC equipment you'll use ~7.5 kWh. And with the GPU algos (all very similar) you'll consume ~9.9 kWh.

As you can see, there is quite a bit of difference between SHA-256 and GPU, but whether that difference is enough to cover your fixed hardware investment or not, that is if you buy an Antminer or not and can reach ROI, for example, is up to you to figure out. Wink
The difference between scrypt ASIC and GPU is much less pronounced, but if you've already got a gaming rig set up, it probably won't take too much convincing to just use what you've got and get with installing and configuring your miner since we're only talking about 30-40 cents a day of difference.  Grin

Edit: I've always been in favor of rotating out SHA-256 and substituting it with a more widely distributed friendly algo BTW.


And between here and there, some 80 posts or so, much of which is reactionary nonsense meant to distract attention away from something possibly extremely beneficial for DigiByte, there are other other bits and pieces of information and words to the wise.

Firstly, I have no problem whatsoever in attempting to level the playing field, it’s what attracted me to DigiByte in the first place. HR, you need to lay out your workings to be scrutinised, it is simply just not good enough to say it’s there for everyone to see, blocksfactory data bla bla bla. That’s like saying there is proof of god in nature around us, for all to see.  What happens if we double the work done by any one of the five algorithms currently being used. How does that change the numbers you are looking at?
HR
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
There is not a set formula for mining profitability.  I thought your analysis was interesting HR.  However, it didn't match my real world data using scrypt ASIC.  Mining can't be analyzed as an independent activity from trading or from a larger systemic approach to investing, supporting, and engaging with DGB.  I spent a significant amount of money on my current ASIC rig.  Around the time it was delivered, the support forums for the company were filled with people saying that it could never be profitable.  Here I am, 2 calendar years later, and I'm still theoretically in profits mining DGB.  I say theoretically because I don't sell to pay for operating costs.

Your work with support and analysis is fantastic.  It is a huge benefit to have you working on behalf of DGB.

To directly address the points in your previous post ... GPU (and CPU) can be profitable.  Clearly it's not the best choice if you try to compete directly with ASIC.  But, it can squeak out a a profit with the non-ASIC algorithms when it is done with care and thought in the process of mining DGB.  ASIC mining is not necessarily bad.  Neither is GPU or CPU necessarily good.  ASICs are a part of our world.

At DGB we have a great diversity of mining and support within our community.  The diversity adds value to DGB.

We all get frustrated sometimes.  It happened to me from December through January.  I just felt like no matter what I wrote here or tried I was pissing into the wind.  I was disheartened, but it wasn't about DGB.

We are here as a DigiByte community to support and encourage and grow.  Everyone here contributes and adds value to our community.  We disagree.  We agree.  We argue.  We build.  We develop.  We support.  We are all committed to the success of DGB.  I think it's great that we have seen some new members of the community expressing interest in mining and supporting DGB.  To all the new members of our community ... we are here to help you.  DigiByte has a bright future.  I believe we will have plenty of challenges on the way, but we'll get there.

The analysis was done using The Blocks Factory data using national average US electricty costs and can be confirmed by anyone with basic math skils wishing to do so. (You can pass that on to Jombley so he does't feel hurt.) The results show that SHA mining is profitable at current prices (on an ex-hardware investment basis) and the clear implication is that GPU mining could be profitable if SHA were NOT present since price would adjust accordingly.

Nice to see someone actually addressing the matter head on and logically BTW. :-)


Another possibility to make the playing field even leveler so as to increase relative profitability between algos, and thereby further incentive "average guy" mining and a more widely distributed and secure network in turn, would be to reduce SHA payouts by 75% and scrypt by 25%.

Everything would truly be equal then, and those beloved SHA miners would still be a part of the "community", BUT WITHOUT SUBSIDIZED FAVORITISM!

Anyone have a problem with the concept of equal opportunity? Especially considering it's even in DGB's best interest?

Doubters and out of hand disqualifiers, confirm the numbers on your own, or if you're too lazy, just ask the Devs if those payout differences are correct or not - they should know . . . and if they don't, it's high time they did!

Again, the raw data is there for anyone with the courage to look and the ability to do basic math. There's no subjectivity involved, much less mystery.

I've crunched the numbers, partly because I was curious, and partly because I'm a nice guy who wants to lend a hand. Wink

At current rewards, in order to mine 5000 DGB with modern SHA-256 ASIC equipment, you'll need ~2.4 kWh. With modern Scrypt ASIC equipment you'll use ~7.5 kWh. And with the GPU algos (all very similar) you'll consume ~9.9 kWh.

As you can see, there is quite a bit of difference between SHA-256 and GPU, but whether that difference is enough to cover your fixed hardware investment or not, that is if you buy an Antminer or not and can reach ROI, for example, is up to you to figure out. Wink
The difference between scrypt ASIC and GPU is much less pronounced, but if you've already got a gaming rig set up, it probably won't take too much convincing to just use what you've got and get with installing and configuring your miner since we're only talking about 30-40 cents a day of difference.  Grin

Edit: I've always been in favor of rotating out SHA-256 and substituting it with a more widely distributed friendly algo BTW.


And between here and there, some 80 posts or so, much of which is reactionary nonsense meant to distract attention away from something possibly extremely beneficial for DigiByte, there are other other bits and pieces of information and words to the wise.
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
Lovin' Crypto
Just grabbed 8 million out of that 8btc wall @55 sats, the rest was quickly removed and placed higher lol.

Stop helping the price to go up for now please xD
Still want to buy more and more cheaper ^^
sr. member
Activity: 443
Merit: 251
Just grabbed 8 million out of that 8btc wall @55 sats, the rest was quickly removed and placed higher lol.
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
Lovin' Crypto
Seems like we've got strong support around 50's now Smiley
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Community Liaison,How can i help you?
Why to much block SHA256 on Node Stratum Pool pending?
Yep, there are some big payouts waiting to happen there on digihash pool! I would have thought it would have been pushed out by now as it was reported yesterday but I have total confidence it will be eventually. 


Yeah.. Still waiting and nothing from the devs. 

Reported in a personal message to jared, Please wait a little longer it will come.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 646
Why to much block SHA256 on Node Stratum Pool pending?
Yep, there are some big payouts waiting to happen there on digihash pool! I would have thought it would have been pushed out by now as it was reported yesterday but I have total confidence it will be eventually. 


Yeah.. Still waiting and nothing from the devs. 
hero member
Activity: 608
Merit: 500
I've always been surprised on how friendly and helpful the Digibyte community has been... but it seems each man has his limits...
Agreed, this pumper is annoying and is clearly manipulating Digibyte down at the moment, let him, means cheaper DGB for all of us and he'll will need to let her fly anyway... hell, she might even breakout without him as Digibyte is getting more and more attention with traders nowadays.

Anyway, Digibyte dev team and community are a unique group, almost never tainted by FUD or inner fighting crap... let's keep it this way!
HR
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
There is not a set formula for mining profitability.  I thought your analysis was interesting HR.  However, it didn't match my real world data using scrypt ASIC.  Mining can't be analyzed as an independent activity from trading or from a larger systemic approach to investing, supporting, and engaging with DGB.  I spent a significant amount of money on my current ASIC rig.  Around the time it was delivered, the support forums for the company were filled with people saying that it could never be profitable.  Here I am, 2 calendar years later, and I'm still theoretically in profits mining DGB.  I say theoretically because I don't sell to pay for operating costs.

Your work with support and analysis is fantastic.  It is a huge benefit to have you working on behalf of DGB.

To directly address the points in your previous post ... GPU (and CPU) can be profitable.  Clearly it's not the best choice if you try to compete directly with ASIC.  But, it can squeak out a a profit with the non-ASIC algorithms when it is done with care and thought in the process of mining DGB.  ASIC mining is not necessarily bad.  Neither is GPU or CPU necessarily good.  ASICs are a part of our world.

At DGB we have a great diversity of mining and support within our community.  The diversity adds value to DGB.

We all get frustrated sometimes.  It happened to me from December through January.  I just felt like no matter what I wrote here or tried I was pissing into the wind.  I was disheartened, but it wasn't about DGB.

We are here as a DigiByte community to support and encourage and grow.  Everyone here contributes and adds value to our community.  We disagree.  We agree.  We argue.  We build.  We develop.  We support.  We are all committed to the success of DGB.  I think it's great that we have seen some new members of the community expressing interest in mining and supporting DGB.  To all the new members of our community ... we are here to help you.  DigiByte has a bright future.  I believe we will have plenty of challenges on the way, but we'll get there.

The analysis was done using The Blocks Factory data using national average US electricty costs and can be confirmed by anyone with basic math skils wishing to do so. (You can pass that on to Jombley so he does't feel hurt.) The results show that SHA mining is profitable at current prices (on an ex-hardware investment basis) and the clear implication is that GPU mining could be profitable if SHA were NOT present since price would adjust accordingly.

Nice to see someone actually addressing the matter head on and logically BTW. :-)
legendary
Activity: 1062
Merit: 1003
C'mon pumper, dump this shit to 10 sats, cause I'm waiting there.

In a future you will write 100 or 1000 sats :-). So you better buy it now when is cheap...

I love this advice from 1 activity accounts Wink

Yes, often it's better advice than that from 714 activity accounts!
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1000
Peaky Blinder
C'mon pumper, dump this shit to 10 sats, cause I'm waiting there.

In a future you will write 100 or 1000 sats :-). So you better buy it now when is cheap...

I love this advice from 1 activity accounts Wink
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1000
Peaky Blinder
C'mon pumper, dump this shit to 10 sats, cause I'm waiting there.

Guess we'll never see it again ^^

ok, so to 20 sats
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
Lovin' Crypto
C'mon pumper, dump this shit to 10 sats, cause I'm waiting there.

Guess we'll never see it again ^^
legendary
Activity: 1193
Merit: 1000
Peaky Blinder
C'mon pumper, dump this shit to 10 sats, cause I'm waiting there.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1003
Why to much block SHA256 on Node Stratum Pool pending?
Yep, there are some big payouts waiting to happen there on digihash pool! I would have thought it would have been pushed out by now as it was reported yesterday but I have total confidence it will be eventually. 
newbie
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
Why to much block SHA256 on Node Stratum Pool pending?
sr. member
Activity: 245
Merit: 250
this is a lot to handle at once. I'll start reading before doing anything. for now I'm going to test every single possibility, then chose the best way. I have a vps to test on and I may try with ASIC, and I'm right now going to test my cpu mining and gpu mining.
I've crunched the numbers, partly because I was curious, and partly because I'm a nice guy who wants to lend a hand. Wink

At current rewards, in order to mine 5000 DGB with modern SHA-256 ASIC equipment, you'll need ~2.4 kWh. With modern Scrypt ASIC equipment you'll use ~7.5 kWh. And with the GPU algos (all very similar) you'll consume ~9.9 kWh.

As you can see, there is quite a bit of difference between SHA-256 and GPU, but whether that difference is enough to cover your fixed hardware investment or not, that is if you buy an Antminer or not and can reach ROI, for example, is up to you to figure out. Wink
The difference between scrypt ASIC and GPU is much less pronounced, but if you've already got a gaming rig set up, it probably won't take too much convincing to just use what you've got and get with installing and configuring your miner since we're only talking about 30-40 cents a day of difference.  Grin

Edit: I've always been in favor of rotating out SHA-256 and substituting it with a more widely distributed friendly algo BTW.

5000 is that the block reward? and the time frame? per day( 24h) or what ? and these calculation are bit too high don't you think ? I do nor have a perfect gaming rig, I do not consider it a gaming rig at all.
I have some old laptops that are no use to me but they still work, I may try to eliminate the display and why not the hard disk too, to minimize the electricity consume, I have like 4 2 (Pentium 4) and 2 (core 2 duo) I may use there cpu.( I have a electronic degree, that won't be a big of a deal)
without forgetting my nvidia.
I tried to do some calculation but, I had really big struggle with mining !! I downloaded the soft and followed the instruction, but my ind kept telling me that I'm not mining, so I changed to the websites that had worker thins so I started mining with there url etc.. and my worker status kept being inactive.
so I had no luck testing my stats.

Hi Crazy.

The current block reward is about 1054 (it is reduced every month).  A block is discovered on the network every 15 seconds.  We have 5 mining algorithms (SHA, Scrypt, Groestl, Skein, and Qubit).  As a result, you could figure that a block is discovered per algorithm about every minute 15 seconds.  Total daily mining rewards are just over 6,000,000 DGB per day.  Each mining algorithm has a different difficulty level that is adjusted asymmetrically between blocks (to reduce mining pool attacks).  We call the difficulty adjustment "MultiShield," which is the newer version of DigiShield.

There are 2 ways to mine: (1) you could solo mine; or (2) you could mine in a mining pool.  When you solo mine - if you find a block - you receive the whole block reward.  When you mine in a pool - if you find a block - the block reward is shared by all the people in the pool who contributed hash rate during the period that the block was found.  Most people mine in pools.  It's easier to set up and it creates less variance in rewards over time.  For instance, if I were mining solo I might find a 5 blocks a day.  I would get all the rewards - so I would get 5270 DGB if I found 5 blocks.  But, some days I would find no blocks.  Other days I might find more than 5 blocks.  So my rewards would be highly variable on any given day.

When I mine in a pool, I combine my hash rate with everyone else mining in that pool.  For the Official DigiHash Pool, the hashrates (and thus rewards) are divided into different algorithms.  The combined hashing power allows the group to find blocks more frequently than people who are solo mining.  The pool might find approximately 100 blocks per day.  The reward per block is less per block, but the variance of reward payout is smaller.  In the long run (i.e. over indefinite amount of time) you would theoretically get the same rewards mining in a pool or mining solo.  However, in practice, mining pools allow miners with lower hashrates to earn regular rewards more quickly (a fact that is especially true with coins that have a high difficulty - such as BTC).

I would recommend that anyone new to mining DGB start mining in a pool.  I would recommend using the official Developer DigiHash Pool because it helps support DGB.

If you intend to mine with a GPU, you will want to use any of the algorithms EXCEPT SHA-256.  SHA is pretty much all ASIC at this point.  Scrypt is both ASIC and GPU, but the GPU hash rate is going to be tiny compared to the ASIC.  I'm not an expert at GPU mining (I haven't done it for about 3 years, and I've forgotten pretty much everything).  If you do not want to use the DigiHash Easy Miner software, you will need to set up some mining software on your computer.  You might try something like multiminer (which is a GUI running on top of BFG miner).  I've never tried it for DGB and I'd be interested to hear if anyone has?

The truth is that nobody can tell you exactly what your mining rewards or costs will be ... it doesn't matter what anyone posts here or anywhere else.  People can give you rough estimates.  You can attempt to use mining calculators to get rough estimates.  But, the final result depends on many different variables (difficulty at any given moment for the algorithm you are mining, settings for the GPU, cost you pay for electricity, hashrate of the GPU, mining pool, exchange rate, need to sell to cover costs or ability to hold and trade at moments of opportunity, etc.).  I do remember when I was GPU mining.  It involved lots of little tweaks to get the most efficient settings and highest rewards.

I've been mining DGB for about 1.5 years (I don't mine any other coins).  I mine with a scrypt ASIC, and I don't mine in the summer because it's too hot.  I actually have a couple of different ASIC rigs that I use (and have used) throughout the year (and years).  I stated mining about 3.5 years ago with GPUs for LTC and small ASICs for BTC.  

Here is my best advice based on my years of experience mining:

I think you should try it.  It's fun, it's addictive, and it's a valuable way to understand digital currencies at a more fundamental level.  You're not going to get rich doing it.  I think people should start mining for a couple of reasons.  First, it is a good way to begin to understand and experience digital currencies at a deeper level.  It's not just trading; it's participating and supporting.  Don't invest tons of money into mining at the beginning.  Learn about how DGB works and start slow.  The second reason people should mine is because they believe in DGB and want to help support the network.  

    

thanks you that's a clear explanation.
I prefer taking a chance and having the block reward to my self.
and I'm drooping the idea of mining with a CPU.
btw the Scrypt ASIC is a CPU, why does it mine better than normal CPU, is it customized for that use only, and why not customized the laptop CPU to do the same . I'm going to give it a look.
I concluded from all this that mining is dying. and can be used as a tool to learn. and to knowledge more about the crypt-world

By the way ... if you're going to solo mine ... you'll need to do some modification to the DGB Core Wallet to turn on the server functionality of the wallet.  It's pretty simple command line stuff but I've never done it so I'm not qualified to give you instructions.  But, I'm sure someone here will be able to help.

I'd seriously advise against solo mining. Pooled mining means lower but guaranteed payouts. Solo mining means you'll get the entire block reward but you may never (and I do mean never) find a block.

That being said if you do want to solo mine you need to add a few options to your digibyte.conf

Code:
rpcuser=user
rpcpassword=password
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
listen=1
daemon=1
server=1

you would then run the digibyte wallet and point your mining software at http://127.0.0.1 with the username "user" and password "password".

Having a crappy internet connection will also hurt you when solo mining as any block you do find will need to be populated with transactions and broadcast over the network before any of the competing pools/miners and with 15 second block times its made even harder to do that.

Think of an ASIC like a specialized CPU. It's been programmed to do only one thing but it does it far better than a general CPU could.

There's a detailed solo mine HOWTO on the OP and on my forum that have already been graciously provided to this user before he came back with smart assed remarks questioning the validity of around 3 hours of numbers crunching on my part. Then when he starts being a cry baby, you all start groveling. What are people to think when you're groveling in front of someone who demonstratably despises hard work and then starts whinning when you make things very clear? At very least, people will say you have problems discerning between people who yank your chain and people who contribute value. You've got a HOWTO on the OP! He's been pointed to a wealth of information, and you still grovel? BTW, How are things going with the DiguSign search of signed embedded documents? I suppose that's been fixed since you find the time to engage in activities that are a waste of time and self humiliating.

Come to think about it, what's the old saying? Birds of a feather fly together? Maybe you're all just alike? Have you ever seen anywhere, not just here with DGB, but anywhere crypto, an analysis as comprehensive as the one I did the other day about mining returns on electricity used? You make than kind of effort and it's followed by babbling gibberish? Frankly it's mind blowing, especially when it answers the all too frequently asked question as to why price is being kept down! The question that immediately comes to mind is if I am surrounded by ingrates, idiots, or losers. And that analysis also clearly shows that mining IS PROFITABLE, for SHA-256, and would be for GPU, if SHA-256 weren't present. What everone's problem? Too tough? Too advanced to deal with? Is it easier to act like a baffoon?



Hey HR.  For what it's worth ... if I have to choose between ingrate, idiot, and loser ... I'll choose for you to put me in the idiot group.
Jump to: