Never say never. Right?
We've had several community conversations about POS. I believe that the one we're referring to here happened back in February of 2015.
At that time, I posted a response that outlined my objections to POS. You can read it here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10583087I still have the same opinion today. I would point out that I didn't entirely rule out the option of a POS system with DGB. I simply suggested that we need to think about the impacts from an economic perspective rather than from a technical one.
When I founded the DigiByte Group, I made a promise that I would never attempt to use my work with the Digibyte Group to attempt to influence development decisions. As a result, when I share my opinions here, I feel the need to qualify them by saying that I believe Jared always works toward thoughtful, considered, and professional development that benefits DigiByte. I also know that he has in the past, and continues today, to evaluate all the options, including POS, and if he believed that implementing some form of POS were in the best interest of DGB, then I would fully support the decision.
I will address the environmental question in a separate post.
Your argument in the linked post is well reasoned and has caused me to modify my response a little.
I would have previously championed POS as per Diamond (DMD)'s implementation however that coin is designed to be held – not spent - and consequently is hampered by the reasons you put forward. To be fair they have been proactive with mitigation strategies but these are outside of the coin mechanics.
DigiByte with DigiSpeed is all about transactions – and transactions need blocks. They are going to need them every 15 seconds soon!
At the moment blocks can only be mined (OK securely by 5 different algos) and that is increasingly more expensive electricity-wise as difficulty increases. As mining becomes more expensive it also typically becomes more centralized
Block generation – not block reward,that is a different topic - by POS based on wallet balance and coin age with wallet (node) uptime (i.e. reset coin age when wallet closed) will provide blocks with substantially less carbon footprint and reward node uptime providers that are contributing to the network stability, coin investment and spreading (de-centralizing) block generation. Reward value can be small 1 – 2 % per annum. Its all about the blocks.
Add quark as an algo, give each algo 10 % of the network and 'uptime-only' POS the remaining 40% and you have a near perfect coin. But then – I'm just a newbie LOL so I'll shutup now