Wow, fun. I tried it, and all I saw for 50 pages were a bunch of 0s. 
Glad you had fun, haha.
That's all it will ever come out to be.
Topic: Directory.io - Now with balances! - page 6. (Read 27421 times)
Glad you had fun, haha.
That's all it will ever come out to be.
Wow, fun. I tried it, and all I saw for 50 pages were a bunch of 0s.
Well, at least now we know which addresses have BTC in them 
On the downside, nobody will ever find an address with BTC in it.
On the downside, nobody will ever find an address with BTC in it.
I would usually caution against installing any Chrome extensions, because they update silently, and can include various keylogging stuff.
Absolutely, always be careful when you install extensions they could steal from your online bitcoin wallets.If anyone is scared of using a Chrome extension you can always use Fiddler to append the CORS header to your HTTP get requests.
None of you have Bitcoin to steal anyway,
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
I am saying nothing of the sort. There is a huge difference between the two. Look at the math and try to understand what it is saying.
(And btw, Gates denies saying that).
Yeah, I don't think he understands the magnitude of the amount of Bitcoin addresses.
I understand the magnitude of the amount of possible bitcoin addresses and I feel safe for today
but for 20 years later, I have no idea. I really don't get how you think it's never possible to brute force collisions.
MD5 was considered safe just like 10 years ago, and today nobody uses it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5#Collision_vulnerabilities
why do you think technology will stay same?
The same reason Moore's Law is incorrect.
I don't agree, just because we don't have the enough hardware atm, it doesn't mean we won't have it in the future either.
there is no need instantly brute force a 256 bit ECDSA key. raising the possibility is a big thing. and this possibility raises every time we add a new address w/ balance to the network already.
there is no need instantly brute force a 256 bit ECDSA key. raising the possibility is a big thing. and this possibility raises every time we add a new address w/ balance to the network already.
I'm going to make an ASIC for this, lol.
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
I am saying nothing of the sort. There is a huge difference between the two. Look at the math and try to understand what it is saying.
(And btw, Gates denies saying that).
Yeah, I don't think he understands the magnitude of the amount of Bitcoin addresses.
I understand the magnitude of the amount of possible bitcoin addresses and I feel safe for today
but for 20 years later, I have no idea. I really don't get how you think it's never possible to brute force collisions.
MD5 was considered safe just like 10-20 years ago, and today nobody uses it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MD5#Collision_vulnerabilities
why do you think technology will stay same?
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
I am saying nothing of the sort. There is a huge difference between the two. Look at the math and try to understand what it is saying.
(And btw, Gates denies saying that).
Yeah, I don't think he understands the magnitude of the amount of Bitcoin addresses.
I don't agree, just because we don't have the enough hardware atm, it doesn't mean we won't have it in the future either.
there is no need instantly brute force a 256 bit ECDSA key. raising the possibility is a big thing. and this possibility raises every time we add a new address w/ balance to the network already.
there is no need instantly brute force a 256 bit ECDSA key. raising the possibility is a big thing. and this possibility raises every time we add a new address w/ balance to the network already.
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
...
I am saying nothing of the sort. There is a huge difference between the two. Look at the math and try to understand what it is saying.
(And btw, Gates denies saying that).
- snip -
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
- snip -
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
- snip -
There's a huge difference between, "should be enough" and "prevented by the laws of physics and nature".
I suppose if you are a religious person, then you might choose to believe that your god can create a computer that is not bound by physics. That holy computer, which is of something other than matter and occupies something other than space, could perhaps instantly brute force a 256 bit ECDSA key.
with today's technology, it's hard to find a collision. but tomorrow's tech, it will be possible and I don't feel good about it.
related topic
related topic
Please take a look at these, even with "tomorrow's tech" it won't be possible:
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/22/is-it-possible-to-brute-force-bitcoin-address-creation-in-order-to-steal-money
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-are-the-chances-of-an-address-collision-and-what-happens-when-it-does-104461
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-address-collisions-254559
it's already possible, but we don't have enough hashing power yet. but tomorrow you don't know what's gonna happen in tech endustry. both hardware and software we use will be greater.
You're saying "it won't be possible" is like this:
with today's technology, it's hard to find a collision. but tomorrow's tech, it will be possible and I don't feel good about it.
related topic
related topic
Please take a look at these, even with "tomorrow's tech" it won't be possible:
http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/22/is-it-possible-to-brute-force-bitcoin-address-creation-in-order-to-steal-money
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/what-are-the-chances-of-an-address-collision-and-what-happens-when-it-does-104461
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-address-collisions-254559
with today's technology, it's hard to find a collision. but tomorrow's tech, it will be possible and I don't feel good about it.
related topic
related topic
LOL, wtf Judith
After seeing this , i really worry about my money !
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
I can make an application to move your coins like you want, it will be open source.
You really shouldn't be worried tho.
Inform me when you finish it . Thanks
No problem, how did you want the coins to be handled?
Do you want to use the client on your computer?
Essentially I will make a script that will create a new address, then transfer X amount to the new address, parse the existing address with the coins balance, create another address, move the coins until the original address is at 0 or what ever you want to set it to.
Did you want this an executable or are you comfortable enough running a batch script or any other code, like Python, Golang, etc?
After seeing this , i really worry about my money !
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
I can make an application to move your coins like you want, it will be open source.
You really shouldn't be worried tho.
Inform me when you finish it . Thanks
You should definitely not be worried, the odds are astronomical (as has been discussed ad nauseam). However, if you didn't want to use that many addresses, you could split them between, say, 10 addresses by hand.
After seeing this , i really worry about my money !
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
I can make an application to move your coins like you want, it will be open source.
You really shouldn't be worried tho.
Inform me when you finish it . Thanks
After seeing this , i really worry about my money !
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
Is there any command line that split my money between my wallet addresses ?
Example : i have 1000 BTCs and 100000 BTCs addresses in my wallet , I wanna SHARE my BTCs between 100000 addresses . how can i do by a command line or
something like that easily ?? And what am i must do for paying no fee for miners ?
I can make an application to move your coins like you want, it will be open source.
You really shouldn't be worried tho.
Jump to: