Users wouldn't need to worry about it if they weren't jumping from campaign to campaign chasing that extra 25c. If you are in a long term campaign, why leave? People see a campaign with a higher rate(usually not a ton) and are quick to want in, but they have no idea if it is a long term or 1 week campaign.
I for one believe in the idea of campaign loyalty -- if I apply for a campaign, it means I plan on being part of it for a long time, possibly until it ends. If the manager sees fit to accept me into it, I feel they deserve for me to stick around for at least a while. Sometimes managers of campaigns I'm in have offered other campaigns they have available to me, in which case they are the ones suggesting that I move; in that case its fine.
But I know its just additional work for them if you move around a lot, and then old posts no longer carry the signature, which means no new traffic can be directed to the sponsor's webpage.
) However, the issue here is that he did not wait for the week end and the post count verification; he probably assumed that he had already met the required number of posts for the current week. And now, he is blaming the manager for removing him from the spreadsheet and cutting him off.
), he sure as hell won't read this topic.
