The fact is that we humans find it easier to find something wrong than finding something right. So if an assumed expert gives his analysis and the game fails, people would pay more attention to that (maybe because it hurts) than if they had a win. I think that is why some people don’t like to share their analysis. What I believe makes someone good at analysis is if they win more than they lose, let’s say the least of 6 wins out of 10 games. But still don’t trust anyone because the analysis you listen to and make your decision with could be the one that fails, you just never know until you lose money.
It's normal with human nature to notice wrongs much quicker than they would with wrights, and people are usually moved to quickly believe and capitalize on failures than they would with success so there's this instinct waiting to experience that failure so as to feed their doubts so they could say they were right after all.
This has actually made so many people prefer to keep their analysis to themselves rather than share it because some times when you share your analysis some people will rather only criticize it than they would commend and this can even be very discouraging and sometimes get you confused and even want to doubts your analysis not knowing that no analysis is best until nit turns out that you were favoured by the odds but then your analysis can be right most of the time and they nighty percentage is all that you need and not the validation of others which sometimes could be wrong.
Well this is something we always have to observe, first of all to believe in an expert they have to have a failure rate, in fact they always scan it in terms of percentages, the accuracy rates they should have would be 85% for it to be correct, but the other reason is that they can fail, that's what I see that could happen to sports betting, do you have the most accuracy of those who give signals in tading? It's something that I don't know very well, but I believe that it can make a difference, in this case things can look like this, I am a person who has been participating in things that are trading and well the signals are like that, I only believe in I know that they have an effectiveness index above 85% because with them you pay subscriptions or something like that, so it is something relative, as far as I am concerned, I am a person who is quite determined with that because if it does pay It has to be very efficient.
Of course, things happen when they turn out well, because Only the Person should take Advantage, I don't know what, but I think that a Professional Should do well with a Specific sport and not be so general, for me there should only be those that are Good for 2 or 3 sports, but those who make predictions for all the exercises, games, disciplines, well , it's something that I at least don't believe, that's basically what I'm looking for in this, if it's a person that Covers many well if I don't believe him much, I won't realize that he is Fine , he is a very attentive person who could tell lies and make the bets to make them , Obviously I like that he says that he is going to Make the bets like this or the prediction and that he gives his view, so that one can Also see that they are not Doing it for the sake of doing it but for something well thought out, that is valued by me and I Think that also the people who follow the Professionals , Well , things should be like that, to Know that they are not saying lies.