So based on the feedback that I received from you guys so far, it seems that most people would prefer that the RTP must be the primary focus of the casino, to improve the gambler experience.
There is absolutely no logic in having say 100 promotions a month and sponsoring 10 high profile celebrities and giving your existing clients a piss poor experience at your casino. You spend millions on marketing to get new people to gamble at your site, but you cannot retain them, because most of your budget goes towards marketing and not to increasing the gambling experience.
Now, what can we as gamblers do to get the casino operators to give more attention to the gambling experience?
The first step is simple. Just
boycott online casinos with nerfed RTPs.
Unfortunately, most online players are not members of BitcoinTalk or other specifically gambling forums. They don't even know what RTP is. That's a fact. And that's why online casinos can still profit from the nerfed RTP action. Unfortunately.
That being said, there are some additional reasons (apart from pure greed) why some casinos are requesting lower RTP set-ups. But that's a theme for another (long) thread.
If I am not being wrong, does slots with lower RTP paid bigger than those that has higher RTPs?
You are indeed being wrong.
Well explained! You have given 3 examples based on the normal mathematical formula and added the importance of variance (volatility) at the end of the description. Actually, the volatility of the slots game has the main impact. Both RTP and the volatility stay on my priority list when I choose any slots game. I don't give any priority to the promotions for the attached wagering requirements.
I give priority to the RTP only when it is related to the wagering. I give priority to the low volatility and high RTP when it is about the number of spins (points gaining contest).
P.S. I just sent a merit to “timerland” by mistake
Thank you, Mahdirakib.
And yes, you are indeed correct -
variance plays a significant role in any slot session. Therefore, related to wagering, it's wise to choose low-variance games to finish/clear wagering requirements. However, there is another point of view.
Some players choice high-variance slot games. And for a good reason. As variance is higher, it also means that players can get a higher advantage over casinos due to the variance. (Of course, if the player is lucky enough, in a relatively short session).
Simply put, the casino always has the house edge over players. No matter if it's 1% or 10%. But with ultra-high variance games, the lucky player can cash out early in the game by hitting that rare 5,000xbet-size win.
In other words, if you imagine the lowest of the lowest variance game (zero variance), the casino will take its profits on every single spin. Just as my example in the previous post. There would be no chance for a player to cash out or win. That's why a high-variance slot game perfectly makes sense to many casino players.
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]