40% bonus will surely affect the price especially if the holders will start to dump their tokens but if the project team will allocate only like 10% of their total tokens for early investors to get the 40% bonus then it is not a problem.
Bounty hunters allocation are only 2-3% of the total tokens so it is not fair that they are going to blame the crashes of token price to bounty hunters only. If there is a big dump, the only responsible to it are investors and the team behind the project.
Topic: Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 12. (Read 6034 times)
Yes, 40% for the early investors is a lot and I think that the maximum bonus for the early investors will be at 20% only. Giving too much bonus for the early investors or the investors in an ICO is a dangerous move because that means that you are giving the pioneer investors a chance to really mess up the price of your coin because they got more supplies and they can easily manipulate the market.
The 40% bonus can be said to be a high bonus that is likely to crash into the price, giving a high bonus does have its own consequences on the token which have both good and bad sides. But to see the long term it is better to reduce the amount of the bonus so that the token has a good flow and doesn't crash quickly.
If I were one of the investors who would avail of a project done plus 40% of the bonus, of course, that would be in my favor especially if that was the case. But if any project campaign ever gives such a headline, they just make sure the price of the token they promote in the market is not affected. Because, if it is not careful and it is not calculated correctly it will surely drop the price of the token in the market.
I agree with most of the reply , 40% bonus is too much. Seems like, project developer wants to offer all just to get your money. Too much bonus will result to massive dump when the project is listed on exchanges.Price will suddenly drop, and maybe some whales will buy back just to play the market. This is base on my observation base on some projects I invested. Some are already dead, nor stagnant now.
40% bonus is not more for early investors because he invest early in the project and hold their funds for long time after that he can sold their altcoins, this is depends on project if project will good than everyone will not sold on launch and also bounty hunter will not sold after receiving their rewards ,everyone will wait for good gain in price .
40% bonus is a way to high, yes. i mean, sure early investors should benefit for their risk, but if they get a bonus of 40%, no one should wonder why the price of a new coin / token dumps so much... everyone which get a high bonus will sell very fast, 40% + is not that bad..
That has always been the issue but project managers seem not to learn from it but keeps repeating it over and over. Truth been said getting a bonus for such a risk is worth getting a bonus but 40% is far too high as any blind investor will definitely sell right away upon listing.
The tricks of the bonus are getting old right now. ICO and IEO turned to be a manipulation tool that some projects are using to gain people's assets and grab their holdings in exchange of an asset that might immediately die after getting listed in an exchanger. 40% is alot, the fact is that the projects are calculating everything since the start, they have a base price and they just try to be smart-ass by putting some "fake" bonus to gather people's attention toward their ico. Peoples must be logic, we're getting tired here watching shit over and over again. Money comes and goes, there's thousands of shitty projects that should die soon.
According to my statistics, such bonuses do not lead to anything good at all. Everyone knows how difficult it is to create a truly adequate ICO with attractive conditions and so that they do not harm the project at the same time.
I don't see 40% of the bonus given to investors wrong, maybe it's the developer's strategy to attract investors. to blame when the price falls is the project developer because of the lack of seriousness to develop it, maybe at the beginning of the list, the price will go down, and that's normal, but if the product is useful and needed in the community maybe the price of the coin will increase even then it will grow, along with the many Request.
To be honest, without filtering any words, I totally think that this is too much bonus for early investors. Little wonder why these ones go on to dump their coins when they don't get as much after. If you are thinking of rewarding investors with that high bonus, you should also be thinking of strategy to keep the bonuses at that rate, or possibly higher. Otherwise, people are just going to dump the coins, and move on to the next promising project. Sadly.
I think the bonus that is given 40% is less relevant because it is very risky when the market listing prices experience a significant price decline and in my opinion this is a big risk for companies that make giving bonuses
buying a token at some benefit bonus is not a crime but they need to be lock for a particular period of time which will prevent them dumping the price and on bounty reward it happen in both side which might be a dump or not there fault too but in any way bear market still makes this unbearable for all.
I second your idea mate, giving the bonus to the early investors is not a crime at all but these tokens are supposed to be locked for a period of time and for that I do agree but ignoring locking these tokens does not help at all since these very investors go right away to dump upon listing since they have nothing to lose from what they gain for free. 
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
For early investors, the bonus should be given not only depending on the investment period, but also on the amount for which they bought tokens. A reasonable maximum bonus is not worth doing more than 30%. Otherwise, at the start of trading, they can greatly reduce the price by selling their tokens.
I think it is pretty much for quality projects. 10-15% is sufficient for early investors. And no bonus for investors at ICO or IEO stage
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
For early investors, the bonus should be given not only depending on the investment period, but also on the amount for which they bought tokens. A reasonable maximum bonus is not worth doing more than 30%. Otherwise, at the start of trading, they can greatly reduce the price by selling their tokens.
ah 40% of bonus is little and this will not attack for price dumping, basically we need follow developing with more popular exchange which coin was listing managing planing. I think 40% of bonus points is good for everyone investor which good project here.
ugh 40% is a huge amount of discount and will definitely affect the market. imagine the supply to the exchange increase 40% because of the project that means a huge chance of price decreasing which correspond to 40% bonus. Also you need to note that alts usually have small liquidity more specifically alts with huge discount.
ah 40% of bonus is little and this will not attack for price dumping, basically we need follow developing with more popular exchange which coin was listing managing planing. I think 40% of bonus points is good for everyone investor which good project here.
ugh 40% is a huge amount of discount and will definitely affect the market. imagine the supply to the exchange increase 40% because of the project that means a huge chance of price decreasing which correspond to 40% bonus. Also you need to note that alts usually have small liquidity more specifically alts with huge discount.
ah 40% of bonus is little and this will not attack for price dumping, basically we need follow developing with more popular exchange which coin was listing managing planing. I think 40% of bonus points is good for everyone investor which good project here.
I can't help thinking that everything relies upon the project. In the event that the project and its development team demonstrate that they will have the option to understand their thoughts and make a cool product, at that point for this situation there will be numerous who need to invest in it and there is no compelling reason to make a major rebate for early investors.
On the off chance that the project is awful, at that point just immense limits for early investors can in any event urge somebody to invest in it.
As a rule, bonus for early investors are ordinary, since they convey expanded dangers contrasted with different investors
On the off chance that the project is awful, at that point just immense limits for early investors can in any event urge somebody to invest in it.
As a rule, bonus for early investors are ordinary, since they convey expanded dangers contrasted with different investors
When a team launch a project and think the best way to attract investors is by giving exorbitant bonuses then they should be ready to face the music, unless they put stringent conditions on ground to protect their token price. As for the early investors there is no need to blame them because everyone will surly do behave like them if given the same opportunity. Furthermore, I can't say if the bonus is too much or not it's left for the team to decide, because even if you tell the team is too much they won't heed to it.
Jump to: