in my opinion if the investor is given a bonus of up to 40% then this is a big bonus because it can make prices drop dramatically after the first listing is done,. and it is unfortunate if it falls on the market, bounty hunters are always blamed .. even though bounty participants are only given 1% to thousands of participants from all the coins that were created,. and the coin creators or developers should be able to review the amount of the bonus given to investors.
I think a bonus of 40% is normal in IEO or ICO because it requires trust to invest in the beginning and maybe the project gives a bonus of 40% so investors will invest their money in their project. And when tokens/coins list at exchangers, investors will surely sell their bonuses to get profit
Topic: Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 8. (Read 5979 times)
in my opinion if the investor is given a bonus of up to 40% then this is a big bonus because it can make prices drop dramatically after the first listing is done,. and it is unfortunate if it falls on the market, bounty hunters are always blamed .. even though bounty participants are only given 1% to thousands of participants from all the coins that were created,. and the coin creators or developers should be able to review the amount of the bonus given to investors.
I think a bonus of 40% is normal in IEO or ICO because it requires trust to invest in the beginning and maybe the project gives a bonus of 40% so investors will invest their money in their project. And when tokens/coins list at exchangers, investors will surely sell their bonuses to get profit In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
in my opinion if the investor is given a bonus of up to 40% then this is a big bonus because it can make prices drop dramatically after the first listing is done,. and it is unfortunate if it falls on the market, bounty hunters are always blamed .. even though bounty participants are only given 1% to thousands of participants from all the coins that were created,. and the coin creators or developers should be able to review the amount of the bonus given to investors.
I remember when lending coins was paying such huge amount of profit then couldn't stand test of time
It all depends on the project, can they really pay this 40% comfortably? How what's their source? I mean this are things you need to consider first
Giving out bonuses to early investors who stand to face the risk involved is really okay but giving out as huge as 40% bonus early investors is too much since it really leads to dumping upon listing so if the 40% is going to be reduced but if not, then its really too much for these early investors.
I think it was a pretty big amount for the time it was listed on the exchange. It will lead to a decline in the price of tokoin and that coin becomes meaningless.
40% bonus for investors is too much. Instead of giving such a huge bonus, why not make it 5% or 10%. In that way, the price of the token will be sure to sky rocket on the exchange.
investors to work on decision as appealing with use of different chance as referring notice with use of news on objective to gives with limit on option to put on investment terms of plan on bitcoin projects.
i do not think that it is too much, since early investors believe in the project prior to exchange, so these tokens could be worthless at the end
it can influence price after exchange listing, for sure, but other things can influence the price as well, and i think much more than these bonus, if the project is good and token price sound in terms of value (without bonus), it should not go done, no matter how much investors wanted to go out, there will always be new to step in
if the token value is high, comparing to project value, it will go down, no matter the bonus in the beginning, research before investment
it can influence price after exchange listing, for sure, but other things can influence the price as well, and i think much more than these bonus, if the project is good and token price sound in terms of value (without bonus), it should not go done, no matter how much investors wanted to go out, there will always be new to step in
if the token value is high, comparing to project value, it will go down, no matter the bonus in the beginning, research before investment
the problem of an initial investor bonus of around $ 40% I think that's the standard rate, in fact I often see recently many new projects offer more than 50% for initial investors, maybe that's one way to attract market investment, but not so if when launched at exchange I think it will affect the value of the token if the investor discards all the tokens they have. but all this depends on the user alone, because not all investors or prize hunters will throw away all the tokens they have.
if the project are launched the IEO on market, developer can make rules to lock the bonus early investor in market, so i think it's fair and can controll the value of coin/token on market stable from dumping by investor itself
Would not it be better if they did not give a high bonus interest instead? but if it is so, it should not shake the investors by accepting a decision later on. In short, in this scenario you have less chances to get profit, it is best to stay away. I do not agree that the developers can control it. If so, you have easy handy decentralized exchanges like forkdelta.
Big bonuses for early investors attract them to the project, however, at the same time, this is the main reason for the rapid drop in the price of a new token after it appears on the exchange. If the bonus is 40-50 percent, it is very profitable for investors to immediately sell tokens at the ICO price and immediately get almost double benefits. Such big bonuses generally harm the project. It is necessary to change the system of investor interest.
The market is always a competitive ground for projects. For a project to attract investors, it has to figure out strategy to do so, either it survives it or it fades away. 40% discount is never a bad idea cos there are thousands of projects out there that needs investors. No high discount, the project is likely not achieve her set goals that requires much investors
On the part of the early investors, I think they are taking a big risk to invest in such project and this is why the developers have decided to give out such bonus to early investors but I think it is too much and could really lead also to a dump because they are willing to sell at a cheaper amount due to the fact that they got it at a discount through bonus
The only reason for the caused dump is not the bonus amount, the early investors usually are interested in the projects from the beginning. The bounty rewards are also used for the dump on the exchange after it gets listed, blaming only one party is not right. The market conditions don't give the last chance if the project was not successfully attracted the investors in the last bull time.
in fact there are many factors that make coins dump and I think for a project that gives a high bonus can make chaos on the coins they make because when coins / tokens enter the list in the market conditions that occur are different and it is difficult to make stable coins if the bonus given that much
At this period where projects are not sure of making good sales, it is too much. In fact i will not advise any serious project to give bonus or discount to investors for buying their token. It has been proven that investors are the one that do crash projects themselves. especially those ones that recieve large bonuses and now some of the dev team are colliding with investors in selling their token that are supposed to be locked. Things are now in bad shape. nobody can really be trusted.
The only reason for the caused dump is not the bonus amount, the early investors usually are interested in the projects from the beginning. The bounty rewards are also used for the dump on the exchange after it gets listed, blaming only one party is not right. The market conditions don't give the last chance if the project was not successfully attracted the investors in the last bull time.
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
For me personally 40% for early investors is not much. I think it is a natural thing to give to early investors who want to invest in it. And to hit the price of the token I think it could have happened because there was no volume and early investors could be said to be more profitable when compared to the bounty hunters.Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Somehow yes
But this is how early investors get rewarded
Else they would just wait and invest late
There's pros and cons of it
However, most of these token would likely being lock-up unlike the late investors which they can trade freely
It really depends
But this is how early investors get rewarded
Else they would just wait and invest late
There's pros and cons of it
However, most of these token would likely being lock-up unlike the late investors which they can trade freely
It really depends
40 percent to early investors is way too reckless and discouraging for investors like me. Infact, once I see that in token economics, it turns off my investment drive and I look elsewhere unless in cases where there will be lock up periods for the token release. Only then can I have a rethink. Also most developers that offer such high and ridiculous bonuses are just thirsty money mongers looking to trap some unsuspecting investors
Jump to: