Topic: Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 10. (Read 5979 times)
If the project needs some fun in order to start functioning, I dont think %40 is too much. Because it is now really really hard to get investors. So projects offer nice bonuses in order to attract investors and get going. After that, they may reduce bonus when they reach a certain amount of fund for the project. I think its normal because there are not many investors left.
It is just normal to early investors in a project,as you can see they are with the company even it has nothing yet. They give thier trust to the company so that they must give a bonus but we all know that when the company are new we didn't invest on it,we will wait until plenty of days to see if it was a scam or not so that Giving bonus to them like that is not too much.
Its gotta to be the team's fault if the project fails before it even launches its product. Which project offers 40% bonus to their early investors?
The marketing will make it appealing for the investors but these days, investors are now aware of what developers can do, they are not even pressured when asked. Developers are only cooperative when they ask for funds but right after that, they are hard to find. Seeing that a number of them are not releasing the tokens easily in the market, some took more than a year before distributing the coins. That ain't good for the investors.
for me it is okay to give them 40% for the early investment because this help the project to grow and also it is quite good for them because they trusted the project. there are some project out there that give 40% more especially it is really good but still be carefull and do your research as well
Research is the first step before investing. Well on my own point of view is yes because if there is a 40% bonus for early investors they might spend too much on bonuses and they might lose their income so maybe they will find another way to cover up what they spend so that's the time that we experience price crashes. But all depend on what project you are going to invest that gives a better result. In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Those are factors contributing to the fall in price, but most of the time it is just a core fault of the token - it doesn't have use cases and/or an ecosystem which creates demand, buy pressure and the desire of the investors to put their funds at stake. There was a strategy back in the days for contributors to buy in ICOs just to sell as soon as it gets listed. Through marketing campaigns the projects create some liquidity from those who buy in blindly at market price driven by fomo.
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Well, huge bonuses will certainly contribute to the dumping of coins, especially coins that have no working product nor have any strategy to prevent dumping.
I guess the developers don't care much about the price/value of their coins otherwise they wouldn't increase the supply that much. They probably don't understand why prices of cryptocoins rise and fall. So, could they be developers with little knowledge of economy or are they just fake developers?
it would appear that way. there were teams so good who manages to really make their token go up right when the market opens.
ARK team did it. and they started trading with the price of less than $0.02.. not sure if it were the real TEK price i think in bittrex. those who dumped most probably are just bounty hunters but were eventually eaten by the buy orders.
team should hire someone who knows how all these can be done. probably knowns how had done it before, start with the unbelievable price, it may disappoint investors but they'd be lucky if they instead buy than dump granting the project is really good.
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Well, huge bonuses will certainly contribute to the dumping of coins, especially coins that have no working product nor have any strategy to prevent dumping.
I guess the developers don't care much about the price/value of their coins otherwise they wouldn't increase the supply that much. They probably don't understand why prices of cryptocoins rise and fall. So, could they be developers with little knowledge of economy or are they just fake developers?
40% is too big even for early investors. this will only make the project not of quality. Good projects will not rely on bonuses, they are more focused on introducing the concept, objectives and platforms to attract investors, rather than relying on bonuses. a bonus that is too large will only make the project destroyed when listing on the market. because there are many investors who will sell tokens that they get from bonuses. this will only make a dump, and I don't like it happening.
It depends. If a trusted project offer 30-40% bonus to early birds then they normally lockedbup the token of early birds for some time. In that time those who participated in the normal sale OK with trade and price of the token. And normally 30-40% is OK cause everyone want to make profit at least 2x-3x if 10-% token with 40% bonus add then its fine if the project have some potential.
The issue about giving bonus to early investors is still a topic most project managers seem not to understand. Though been an early investor comes with risk taking but what happens right after listing is when project managers realized they have done a big mistake for giving out such huge percentage bonus and instead of accepting the blame, they tend to push the blame on bounty hunters meanwhile the whole bounty allocation was just 5%. Indeed giving out 40% bonus is huge and should be reduced.
yes. 40% is too much. you couldn't attract someone to send few coins to your project without guaranteeing them profit right after exchange listing. while its too much of a bonus they are also going to be dumping the tokens they bought from the project, its not likely going to be bought back unless you really have a project that has the chance to really explode. without the potentials of the coin, you may not even attract some bounty hunters promoting it either so you will result to giving 40% bonus. ohgodness.
however, I've seen enough projects that can't even maintain 50% of their target price when listing to a market, even popular markets.
exactly. seen project even tried buying back their own coin because its what they promised but prices crumbles to less than $0.10. its common during the ICO days and its happening still this IEO days. bounty hunters are going to drag the price lower when its distributed to them as well. a confident team will survive but those who will blame each other why things are happening will crumble. rumors will come that will affect the price.
There are some projects that even increased by 60%, I don't feel strange because of this. They need the initial support investors, with quite a large amount. However, this strongly affects the following private buyers. If there is no liquidity with fair value, the project will be fuded from the community.
yes. 40% is too much. you couldn't attract someone to send few coins to your project without guaranteeing them profit right after exchange listing. while its too much of a bonus they are also going to be dumping the tokens they bought from the project, its not likely going to be bought back unless you really have a project that has the chance to really explode. without the potentials of the coin, you may not even attract some bounty hunters promoting it either so you will result to giving 40% bonus. ohgodness.
however, I've seen enough projects that can't even maintain 50% of their target price when listing to a market, even popular markets.
Not too much. 40% is the appropriate bonus for people who support the project for a long time. As you know, in the long run, the prices of altcoins collapse
That is alot of coins. People would be ready for markets out to dump the coins eventually.
Yes, it's definitely way too much unless they are locking the early investor's tokens for a few months it will surely create a major dump upon listing.
Personally I dont think so even though we are made to believe that most projectshave seen their down trends due to the fact tgat early investors dump so ey and at low rates, I believe that the should be -t&c covering all bonuses that will really favor the project and prevent rapid dump
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
For me personally 40% for early investors is not too much because there are some other projects that provide bigger and 40% is a normal bonus for early investors. But, if we look at it from the perspective of the bounty hunters, the bonus is arguably very large and it is a very good result if we look at it from the perspective of the bounty hunters.Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Given a 40% bonus for early investors can be dangerous and at the same time can be beneficial. It all depends on the marketing strategies of the project. If the sales goes well, this offer is likely to draw more investors to the project. The most important thing is not to keep the 40% bonus throughout the sales. Normally it is given out as an early bird catch sales for a small period of time whereas the subsequent sale's offers follow the normal price trend.
yes. 40% is too much. you couldn't attract someone to send few coins to your project without guaranteeing them profit right after exchange listing. while its too much of a bonus they are also going to be dumping the tokens they bought from the project, its not likely going to be bought back unless you really have a project that has the chance to really explode. without the potentials of the coin, you may not even attract some bounty hunters promoting it either so you will result to giving 40% bonus. ohgodness.
Not too much. 40% is the appropriate bonus for people who support the project for a long time. As you know, in the long run, the prices of altcoins collapse
Indeed, with the early support of these investors, projects that reward them with such a reward are appropriate, even if it adds a few percent more, it is not a big deal because as you said, in the long run, no one knows what will happen to the project, it could be a reward or a risk, the bonus created by the project only helps people feel fair, which is also a way to attract investors. But one very clear problem is that the bonuses are bigger, very few people risk venturing to invest in such projects, the risk is usually quite largeJump to: