Topic: Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 17. (Read 5982 times)
Such investors are dumping coins more than bounty hunters. Imagine if you are getting an opportunity to earn 40 percent just from air, besides projects require huge sums for early investors, at least 5-20 thousands dollars.
This bonuses are huge and can crush market prices easily hence should be given yet regulated (locked)
This has been discussed time with out Number. project owners due blame bounty hunters as the main reason for market dumping forgotten that investors are after their money and can't wait to move into another project. the blame should be on investors and not hunters.
They give too much bonus to attract investors and of course if you’re going to buy you are planning to exit early so you can earn more. The hunters are just a small number of the total supply, it can affect the price of the token if they sold it in one day but not all hunters will do that. It is still depend on the project, if its good or not. 
Forget about them how on earth could you give out 40% for early investors, this raises so many speculation and as an investor you shouldn't be happy. Remember nothing comes that cheap and so gaining that percentage as bonus should tell you something.
That's right, because huge bonus will make investors immediately sell coins / tokens so I'm sure that projects like this will die soon, this is the mistake that makes investors afraid to put their money in cryptyo.
I consider this to be a great mistake most project managers make but yet they have not decided to accept their mistakes but do consider blaming bounty hunter when dumping comes as a result of giving early investors 40% discount or early bonus since these investors have got nothing to lose upon dumping. Project managers should consider this and stop blaming hunters.
The amount bounty hunters are getting are not comparable from investors and the team. There is no way that a project will end up bankrupt because of them. It should affect in the initial trading of that coin but later on, you should see the true performance of that project. If they have something to offer to the community, their price should increase after certain period of price dump.
I consider this to be a great mistake most project managers make but yet they have not decided to accept their mistakes but do consider blaming bounty hunter when dumping comes as a result of giving early investors 40% discount or early bonus since these investors have got nothing to lose upon dumping. Project managers should consider this and stop blaming hunters.
Not if you compare it to the heavily discounted buy ins Wall Street gets on pre-public companies
I don't think so, there are some ICOs have more discount than 40% for early investors.
Some locking time will be good, otherwise the early investors can get quick profit once it listed on exchange,
and make the price of the coin go dump.
Some locking time will be good, otherwise the early investors can get quick profit once it listed on exchange,
and make the price of the coin go dump.
very tempting bonus for investors who will buy but we have to look at the concept and value of a tokeb or coin to be marketed, but with such conditions investors will get a very large profit if a coin has entered the market and has an effect high dump, hahha sometimes conditions like that that are blamed is a bounty hunter which always causes the price of a coin to fall 
Obviously, its high and is favorable to investors too. Im sure a lot of people will become interested in the project but in the contrary, the company will become at lost during the working time. Its better to always have a balance share amount.
This is a great issue that project managers are finding it difficult to understand, they always think giving out 40% bonus to early investor is a strategy of attracting enough investors to invest in their projects forgetting these are the very people who will help cause dump upon listing and when this happens, these very project managers do not accept their faults but end up blaming bounty hunters for dumping. For me, giving 40% bonus to early investors is too much.
For the early projects that were launched, this doesn't really make the price of their coin dumped so much. Opinions about dumping and bonuses are two different things. For a project to go on and have more investors, they need to get what the investors what and that's giving them one incentive like bonuses.
And not the majority of the investors are even investing that early.
And not the majority of the investors are even investing that early.
As I would see it, 40% is incredibly high for bonus. Envision if early investors for private sale purchase up to 30% of all out supply, that implies they get tremendous heaps of the coin/token as bonus which doesn't inform well concerning the tokenomics. This can be shortened with extremely long vesting period which can be discharged in groups in any case. A decent task doesn't really need to give out enormous bonuses to draw in investors, this is only my take.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
This is a big number for a bonus.
This factor is most likely to make prices fall. 40% or more will greatly affect the market. If the investor discards all the bonuses, it will certainly have an impact on prices and this is what the project does not think of. They only think about the sale without thinking about the consequences in the future.
In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
Considering the risk the early investors took; i don't think 40% bonus is too much
Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?
There are so many projects that offer high bonuses, but I look more into other details about the project than just the bonus offered. When I also see such project, it make me ask questions on why they are offering such huge bonus and some offer beyond that. However, that should not be the point of attraction. There are projects that do not offer bonuses, yet they grow appreciably on exchange, which is much better than even a project with 100% bonus and yet dumps. 
This is the reason why price could drop after a listing below an ICO price. Because some investors bought tokens in a huge sale. Investors didn´t understand that and they are blaming the bounty hunter for causing a dump after a listing. 
This has been discussed time with out Number. project owners due blame bounty hunters as the main reason for market dumping forgotten that investors are after their money and can't wait to move into another project. the blame should be on investors and not hunters.
Forget about them how on earth could you give out 40% for early investors, this raises so many speculation and as an investor you shouldn't be happy. Remember nothing comes that cheap and so gaining that percentage as bonus should tell you something.
I think giving investors such a high amount of bonus would affect the value of the tokens in the long run, when listed. The investors would be willing to dump the amount received as bonus to cushion the amount spent during the tokensales and may be willing to sell at any price. If the project has a solid use case and is able to reduce the amount of tokens in circulation, that would be great.
Jump to: