Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 20.

aditasetia123

member

Activity: 464

Merit: 10

Quote from: mamahdedeh on August 25, 2019, 09:36:06 AM

Quote from: BitTraderCute on August 25, 2019, 09:30:29 AM

Quote from: [email protected] on August 25, 2019, 08:37:41 AM

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

i have different opinion about big bonuses for early sale investors.developers team trying to attrack investors and collect as much as money they can.with this ways i am worry if they will have exit scam strategy someday.they just focus on collecting money without thinking well about the effect from big bonuses.we have to becarefull with projects like this.

logically, with a large bonus, the project team focuses on fundraising. because a good project will sell expensive coins based on white papper that ensures that the project is quality, so be careful with this way of promotion. it could be that you are a victim of project fraud. it happened a lot in 2018, where many projects were fraudulent, so investors lost money

building good projects actually didn't need huge money.if we see in several IEO on several reputable exchanges their goals only below $5millions.but due this quality and no bonuses investors become interested to joined.there is small possibility that investors will dumped their token that bought in expensive price.bonuses not always good for projects , it could be sharp knife that will attack itself.

mamahdedeh

full member

Activity: 812

Merit: 100

www.cd3d.app

Quote from: BitTraderCute on August 25, 2019, 09:30:29 AM

Quote from: [email protected] on August 25, 2019, 08:37:41 AM

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

i have different opinion about big bonuses for early sale investors.developers team trying to attrack investors and collect as much as money they can.with this ways i am worry if they will have exit scam strategy someday.they just focus on collecting money without thinking well about the effect from big bonuses.we have to becarefull with projects like this.

logically, with a large bonus, the project team focuses on fundraising. because a good project will sell expensive coins based on white papper that ensures that the project is quality, so be careful with this way of promotion. it could be that you are a victim of project fraud. it happened a lot in 2018, where many projects were fraudulent, so investors lost money

BitTraderCute

full member

Activity: 899

Merit: 101

Quote from: [email protected] on August 25, 2019, 08:37:41 AM

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

i have different opinion about big bonuses for early sale investors.developers team trying to attrack investors and collect as much as money they can.with this ways i am worry if they will have exit scam strategy someday.they just focus on collecting money without thinking well about the effect from big bonuses.we have to becarefull with projects like this.

[email protected]

full member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 101

we can see different marketing strategies for each developer. including the awarding of investment bonuses, it is only an attempt to get early investors who really trust them from the start. because getting investors in the beginning is really difficult. 40% bonus is quite good and worth the initial investment. some even give more than that.

LogitechMouse

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1043

Need A Campaign Manager? | Contact Little_Mouse

I don't say it is too much because that is their "marketing strategy".

Maybe some are saying it is too much but that is one of the benefits of an early investor and at the same time, this helps the project to attract more investors. As an investor, it will be good for you because you can get a huge bonus upon buying their token but as it gets listed it will simply make the price of the coin to go lower immediately.

crenfrosck

member

Activity: 470

Merit: 12

Definitely not. Just imagine being in their position when they are willing to basically ”sponsor” a bunch of people with an idea while they have not raised a lot of money so far. In addition, those tokens are most likely going to be locked up for a certain period of time (even after being listed) and those people are usually not responsible for a sudden drop of price. Showing them some gratitude with a bonus is reasonable, if you ask me.

jagaban

copper member

Activity: 322

Merit: 8

Quote from: ||bit on August 24, 2019, 12:48:23 PM

I don't think no-one should pay %40 less for the same thing just because they are paying earlier.

I mean, people are buying these for investment and think about you are buying gold for 1400$ yet some other people bought it for 1000$. Is this fair?

Reeks of a project that is only interested in selling tokens and not thinking about the success of the project itself. 40% is too much to give out as bonuses to investors but because they are trying to lure investors in, they give out all these juicy bonuses. Upon listing on an exchange, the investors get to realize that they have been fooled as the price of the token tanks due to other investors dumping their tokens.

spydee1522

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 10

This is really the most annoying part of it all where early investors are given 40% bonus and upon listing, they go straight and dump the tokens. Most project managers have not realized this which is a big mistake to give early investors such bonus and later blame bounty hunters for dumping whereby only few allocation was given for the bounty campaign. To me, 40% bonus to investors is too much.

AlfNobel

newbie

Activity: 158

Merit: 0

40% bonus is good for investor but it's bad for token/coin price.

||bit

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 506

I don't think no-one should pay %40 less for the same thing just because they are paying earlier.

I mean, people are buying these for investment and think about you are buying gold for 1400$ yet some other people bought it for 1000$. Is this fair?

Specimen

jr. member

Activity: 95

Merit: 1

it doesn't make sense if the blame is bounty hunter because bounty hunter only gets very few tokens unlike investors and teams especially because investors have received tokens in advance so there is a possibility that investors will also sell unless the investor hasn't received tokens then because of course it is bounty hunter
but despite that I don't think it is too much because the investors' contribution is very large towards the sustainability of a project so they deserve to get such a big bonus and they also have the right to do anything about their coins as well as the bounty hunter

Peterdav

full member

Activity: 840

Merit: 100

I think 40% bonus is too high and i have seen many project when initial token offering they give bonuses more than 70%. Highest bonus will make token price dump after token listed on exchange, don't blame bounty hunter because alocation for bounty is small around 2% - 5%.

ruski

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

Yes, 40% (or higher) is too much as a bonus, and that the reason the token price falls down after the end of the ICO, since so many early investors dump their tokens for the lowest rates. Devs are generally blaming bounty hunters for dumping, but in fact, the real dumpers are the early investors who purchased the tokens with huge bonuses.

robelneo

legendary

Activity: 3416

Merit: 1225

Quote from: Torps1 on August 18, 2019, 11:58:09 AM

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

A good project does not even have to give that kind of bonus, or they should not give a bonus at all, the main attraction for investors to invest is the project itself, this should be where the selling point start and not on the bonus, it only invites dumping.

funcryptoco

member

Activity: 107

Merit: 26

Yes, high bonus is very bad, it cause the price collapse. always i stay away from coins with high bonus , no bonus or very low bonus is better for the price

tokoorochan

member

Activity: 73

Merit: 10

Quote from: Jadesola on August 24, 2019, 05:26:46 AM

As far as am concern, i don't see any reason why a project should give 40% discount for IEO or ICO for an early investors, this will surely not help the price of a coin at listing. If a project is solid, the discount should not be more than 20%.

40% for early investors i think its too big and sounds not fair for other investors.if developers team didn't lock the bonus , market usually blamed bounty hunter as an actors that caused price dumped in market.but in IEO we will not see this again , only small discount that will given there.so dont worry price will dumped if we participate in IEO.

kevinzxz

full member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 105

👉bit.ly/3QXp3oh |🔥Launchpad on TON

Quote from: Torps1 on August 18, 2019, 11:58:09 AM

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

of course the token bonus of 40% is very large, because in my opinion the maximum bonus received by investors should only be 10% -15% or a maximum of 20% and if investors get a bonus of 40%, then I think the opportunity to make coin prices go down very far can happen and to make the price of the coin increase again is very difficult (although there is a possibility it can happen), because most people also see the total supply of the coin, so if the bonus given by the project exceeds 40% then most people will not invest in the coin, because the opportunity for coin prices to increase is very small.

iv4n

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1179

It`s not a problem in bonus, problem comes if early investors decide to dump their coins right after listing. Investors don`t like someone to tell them what they can do or not with their money and coins, but there should be some rule that will restrain early investors from making this quick schemes for making money while project and small investors suffer later.
But it`s the business world, there are winners and losers, I think we can`t do nothing about this matter. Early investors have some benefits and that will stay like that forever.

Jadesola

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 11

As far as am concern, i don't see any reason why a project should give 40% discount for IEO or ICO for an early investors, this will surely not help the price of a coin at listing. If a project is solid, the discount should not be more than 20%.

blu.storm

member

Activity: 320

Merit: 17

free space pm if interessed

instead in my opinion is the right percentage for early investors who risk so much by investing in a project that is not known if it will succeed or not, so it is easy to invest later when already a little is outlined for the trend of the ico

Topic: Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors? - page 20. (Read 6026 times)