Ahh yes, Twitter and Fox news, those two bastions of facts and evidence.
You throw in a handful of links to medical journals to make it look like you maybe have some idea of what you are talking about, knowing that most other anti-vax morons won't click on a single one and definitely won't read them, but the links you provide don't prove a single one of your claims. This one, for example -
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3370379/ - just talks about myocarditis and does not mention COVID or COVID vaccines even once. This one -
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.03.21263103v1.full.pdf - just says that if you get COVID once you probably won't get it again. You know, like a bunch of other diseases.
Your bullshit is very transparent.
I know this must be a very alien concept to you, but some people don't just get everything they need from one source who just tells them everything they need to know without further documentation or even discussion. Even one real government source!
The presentation takes bits of information from multiple sources and uses them as evidence to support an idea. The show notes are extensive because the creator is dilligent about showing from whence he derived the information. This is so that the audience can verify things and follow up more easily. A lot of times the link will be to an article or information source where the author is pointing out how deceptive they are being.
Again, I understand that this idea of documenting sources and linking to information is a novel concept which many people cannot even get their minds around. We people who have moved beyond the simplistic form of 'learning' can only shake our heads.
---
That said, I finally got squared away and have come around and realized the error of my ways due to another 'anti-vaxxer':
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jzCG5tEVXBV1/ Funny enough, the guys is about as convincing as the folks on the corp/gov authorize media:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EP3UOenzywAn/
