Topic: Do you trust the co-vid19 vaccine ? - page 47. (Read 20577 times)

The designers of this thing basically need what they call 'growing citizen pushback' in the chosen scenario (called 'LockStep').  This will be used as impulse to justify authoritarian structures they want.  Seems to me that the attitude has shifted significantly toward the more honest 'Yeah, we created the virus in a lab to justify the kill shots.  What are you going to do about it?"  And they have a point.  The choice for the initial salvo was basically the common cold and heavy corp/gov media propaganda.  They certainly would have much more nasty goodies in the arms depots.

Probably creative non-compliance with some degree technical sabotage with the help of mid-level operatives who've finally recognized what they are involved in would be the best foil, but I don't see any way that such a thing will be organized.  It might be effective without any particular organization though, and in fact that might be the only way it could be doable.

Slowly the whole scam gets undone. Singapore stopped reporting covid cases and now handle it like any other illness.

Next step is to look after the once who got shot. To late for the fatal wounded but maybe some with serious injury can get improve one way or another.
Then is the court battles of all who got shot. If shot with gun or needle does not matter same thing.
Cant sue Smith & Wesson,  GLOCK or Moderna, Pfizer.
The one who pull's the trigger will be dealt with. Shooting a poisonous dart or a bullet has same outcome, some are fatal, others have long term permanent injury and some just a bit a pain for 24h. It is a shooting injury and outer protective layer (skin) has been penetrated.

At least a few politicians in some places are making a feeble attempt to look after 'their people'.  Could just be that they are looking toward how to defend themselves in the future if the technocratic take-over fizzles.  Who knows?

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/Izm2hjr5Xhtq/

---------

Exactly why do people get shot with the deathly poison?
https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/press-conference-in-canberra-on-17-june-2021-about-updated-atagi-covid-19-advice

The Authority seeks to procure a framework agreement for temporary body storage in the event of an excess deaths situation for the 32 London boroughs and the City of London, led by Westminster City Council. The framework agreement will appoint a single provider and will be for a period of 4 years

This is kinda obvious. The old dial and push-button landlines phones, didn't have a way to store regularly used numbers. You had to have a Rolodex or a good memory. Nowadays, if you lose the numbers programmed into your phone, you will have a difficult time finding the numbers of your friends and relatives.

Negative.  A fair number of my peers in Si Valley were former aerospace engineers and what-not, but that was mostly because they are smart people and coding is relatively easy and pays well.

As far as I am concerned, the exposure that most 'kids these days' get with computers (mostly cell phones) acts as a significant deterrent to actually understanding the technology.

After some time in the 'developing world' I am convinced that cell phones are deliberately designed to make sure that most common people with the native potential to compete with their laptop warrior peers in corp/gov never progress far enough to do so.  And because they get hooked on cell phones, joogle, facefuck, etc, they never progress far enough to pose any threat of competition.

It's really not as bad as you think. Kids are smart. When the need arises, it will be easy to introduce them to the icons and sliders in math and on slide rules. From there, they will want to go back to computers in the right way.

Someone 'missed it', but it wasn't me.

The thing that most oldsters don't realize is that kids are not 'good with computers'; they are good with icons and sliders on Windows and Android and such.  Not at all the same thing.

You missed the point, he never said it was a VIRUS in the first place. He has an ANTIVIRUS but it was blocked because not of the virus but because it was suspicious. Imagine a "NEWS article" site determined by a system to be SUSPICIOUS.

Commonly websites such as news was not even blocked or anything, even the mini news that you can see.

Presumably your 'antivirus software' will tell you what it was that was 'suspicious' about the site?

I've never used antivirus software since in my experience it is worse than any virus I know of in many ways, and since 1995 I've never got a 'virus' that I know of (which doesn't mean that I've not got them of course.)  I did visit the page and it would not load because (reportedly) because of an ad-blocker.  I do now run pi-hole on my network which is a lot of fun.  Recently I blocked 'play.google.com' to see what would happen.  (Nothing bad really seems to FWIW.)  When I look at the pi-hole logs, play.google.com is the only thing blocked.

Come on... that is your source? I mean "freedom sphoenix dot com" -> "johnbwellsnews dot com" which itself is referring the original source to some where "principia-scientific dot com" which is blocked by my antivirus with reason "Category: Suspicious".

The reason: not one of 1500 samples of people tested "positive" could find Covid-19. ALL people were simply found to have Influenza A, and to a lesser extent Influenza B. This is consistent with the previous findings of other scientists, which we have reported on several times.

Dr. Derek Knauss: "When my lab team and I subjected the 1500 supposedly positive Covid-19 samples to Koch's postulates and put them under an SEM (electron microscope), we found NO Covid in all 1500 samples. We found that all 1500 samples were primarily Influenza A, and some Influenza B, but no cases of Covid. We did not use the bulls*** PCR test.'

At 7 Universities Not Once COVID Detected

'When we sent the rest of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a couple of the labs at the University of California, they came up with the same result: NO COVID. They found Influenza A and B. Then we all asked the CDC for viable samples of Covid. The CDC said they can't give them, because they don't have those samples.'

'So we came to the hard conclusion through all our research and lab work that Covid-19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was only called 'Covid,' and most of the 225,000 deaths were from co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, pulmonary emphysema, etc.. They got the flu which further weakened their immune systems, and they died.'

'This Virus Is Fictitious'

...

Really?
Please tell me so no need to put face mask any more?
Btw does that apply to all countries or some specific countries only?

Zero.

Please try to let this sink into your brain:

The "covid war" is over.
We've administered enough vaccinations to solve the problem.
Therefore, we don't care if you get a vaccine or not.

The only person you're fighting against at this point is yourself.