Intrinsic would be a snipe on the fact bitcoin has no base exchangeable worth, so they are saying it will goto zero and/or be replaced. Dollars are made from cotton, ditto just a comment on its priced value being far beyond its base worth. Gold is an element, it will never be replaced so that would have intrinsic value at some level though some say its also overvalued, etc
Extrinsic, oppisite means not essential ie bitcoin cannot be argued to be essential
yes it is an investment(financial) cause it appreciates in value
Thats circular logic imo. Anything at all can make money. I'll buy a jar of air from you for more then you bought it if I felt like. A man made millions from selling pet rocks. Can the owners said to have made an investment, the rocks did appreciate at least initially
I think investment is a (re)usable entity that returns a positive from the utility it provides. Bitcoin maybe could be argued as unique and useful, its enabling business to take place globally that might otherwise be difficult. However I would say its more of a commodity and the investment potential lies with the companies that utilise it not the bitcoin by itself.
Gold or silver are not investments, they have no return from themselves however they can be crafted to a product or they can allow stable business to be conducted similarly so that is utility but the investment return is in their use not the raw metal same with bitcoin. I dont think bitcoin gives a return only speculative gains from others activity, its an inverse relationship not direct investment similar to plain dollars