Topic: Does Whitepaper determined credibility of an ICO (Read 2149 times)
White paper can not mean any certainty. Scammers copy everything, anything and describe their fraudulent project very nicely. However, this does not mean anything. Opybeennaya, reliability will be only when the ICO projects will be fully regulated by government agencies. I mean the process of organizing and conducting ICO, and not its technical side. Until that time, we will all suffer losses from scammers.
A careful investors will read whitepaper. It is very important. When ico developers plagiarize a whitepaper. The ico is indicated scamm only sloppy investors not read the whitepaper.in whitepaper stated all aspects from roadmap to team.
not all projects are also shown with whaitepaper. but the ico project can indeed be depicted on their whitepaper. all picture and plan projet will we know if reading the whitepaper, but that all doesn't make the ico will be successful. investors must think of the project can be developed for real or just in the concept. If a project makes sense I suppose the project deserves to get investment. 
See that you understand what Whitepaper is, the document in which the full operation of the project is described, its capabilities and much more its availability does not guarantee the success of the project, it can be one id of constituents, and if it is not separately
The White Paper is a very important thing too present from an ICO. This includes the information about the project. Yes, I think that whitepaper really determine the credibility of an ICO. We can also get the exact information of the tokens from the whitepaper. But, there are also still some terms that will increase the credibility of the ICO.
Whitepaper giving an overview of patterns and ICO will run. When it has a system with good then certainly can at least make the ICO will sure thrive. However, it would be different if it was simply a whitepaper without clarity or thus only contains text that has no clear meaning. indeed does not make guarantees but at least whitepaper will give confidence in selecting the ICO
A careful investors will read whitepaper. It is very important. When ico developers plagiarize a whitepaper. The ico is indicated scamm only sloppy investors not read the whitepaper.in whitepaper stated all aspects from roadmap to team.
I personally think the team is more important than the whitepaper. A well-known professional team, packed with great advisors, is a must for me.
Of course, a good whitepaper is appealing for an investor and you should also consider it, especially if it is well-written (every explanation needed for the ICO is there). But don't think it ss the only source to decide whether you should invest in the projects or not. The whitepaper can be plagiarized, bought, copy-written and so on.
I agree with you, because with the Driving Team, the ICO will be successful in the market.Of course, a good whitepaper is appealing for an investor and you should also consider it, especially if it is well-written (every explanation needed for the ICO is there). But don't think it ss the only source to decide whether you should invest in the projects or not. The whitepaper can be plagiarized, bought, copy-written and so on.
Experience is the most valuable point and the Whitepaper was created by the development team.
A good white paper say all about the teams Vision at the stage we read it, but when it comes to utility tokens, it should not be taken as a gaurentee of anything. White paper is a good place to start, but not main piece of the due diligence process.
In my honest opinion, I do not think that the whitepaper plays a role in determining the credibility of ICOs. Yes, it might be an important part of an ICO, but it does not go as far as telling if an ICO is credible or not. We have seen even more convincing and really good whitepapers from projects that turned out to be scams.
read an article long ago that the Chinese can make an excellent white paper and a technical document. so I would not 100% trust them
Hello! Of course Whitepaper matters when reviewing the ICO. But this is not an indication that we will not be deceived. All this can be flawless. But if the creators want to deceive, then he will do it. I already had such a case. 
Some times it may be true and some time its fack.because there are some scam and fack projects are also included...its gives all information about and projects.and some people are making changes in projects which are not real.
It is important to have a good whitepaper but it means nothing just a good whitepaper.
I saw good whitepapers in scam icos.
I saw good whitepapers in scam icos.
I don't think that the white paper can prove the credibility of an ICO. Some people in the market are selling white papers, and marking clearly the prices of the whitepaper .
Unfortunately the way it is, on one forum I found the service for writing a whitepaper. And this service costs from $ 100.
This problem cannot be established. Some white papers are very good, but their project side is the fraud team. Or if the funds are not enough, ICO will fail.
you can find all the thing about ICO in their whitepaper, their vision, mission, roadmap, team, milestone. etc. And when you find that an ICO has whitepaper that too similar to other ICO, it might indicate that the ICO is scam. Then you look for the team member, and search it in google, if you find something suspicious better left the ICO.
Whitepaper is just the plan of the project and it's not a guarantee that the team will follow what is written in the WP and it's too easy to fabricate a impressive white paper just to lure investors money. It's not that easy to find a good project because it will depends on the core of the team, product and the support of the community.
I don't think that the white paper can prove the credibility of an ICO. Some people in the market are selling white papers, and marking clearly the prices of the whitepaper .
Hi there,
Whitepaper would not be alone to understand if the project is credible or not but, it lets you know if the idea would be profitable or not. Besides, you would be able to see the business model offered. It needs to make sense too. You would find information regarding team and roadmap in the whitepaper too. It is an important tool to determine if the ICO is profitable or not.
Kind regards,
Whitepaper would not be alone to understand if the project is credible or not but, it lets you know if the idea would be profitable or not. Besides, you would be able to see the business model offered. It needs to make sense too. You would find information regarding team and roadmap in the whitepaper too. It is an important tool to determine if the ICO is profitable or not.
Kind regards,
White Paper it is just result of job of people which have created this document. Sometimes this people have not connection with the ICO team, because their job is just creation of White Papers.
Jump to: