Pages:
Author

Topic: Doing some work for Saxydev, Earned $90 but Never received the Payment.  - page 3. (Read 996 times)

member
Activity: 429
Merit: 52
wow. really wow. sent pm to someone i trust from the forum with the details, he can confirm or not, depends if he wants to get involved in this thread. up to him. locally i don't store the key any more, but i had the intuition to restore the drive to get it back a few weeks ago and got it saved.

@newsletterbitcoin , you are delusional and gay. 100% gay. gay and tired. gay and shitposter

edit: you are also fat. very fat. fat and gay.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1
So after being offline since Februyary 13th, Rizzrack's alt suddenly wakes up; again, just after he posted from his main account and pretending it's just a coincidence. How sweet!

Look.... you keep contradicting yourself, while you mention in some comments that I'm not Rizzrack's alt

I never mentioned you are not his alt. I mentioned that (1) it's possible for you to be his alt and (2) that it doesn't matter if you are, or not, his alt.

In any case, as I also wrote once more,

In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not

Do you understand this? It does not matter if you are his alt or not.

I don't know how you read texts, but I think I was very clear.

I promise I'll take the time in the following days to address your questions

Ohhh I must feel blessed! Thanks for this sign of generosity! However, be careful that you read with attention those questions, meaning word by word, in order to make sure you understand what I asked and avoid embarrassing yourself like you did until now, when you either said something which I did not say or you made another Houdini move, just like saxydev did.


It's not that "after been offline since 13th of february" it's more along the lines that you literally addressed me 2 days ago, and I answerred you yesterday.

Don't worry I'll make sure to address every word and punctuation you've pointed my way.

But man, honestly now, it really seems like you have an act for stirring up drama,  were you by any chance not accepted into the "popular girl group" back in highschool and trying now to relive your dream life via bitcointalk ?

Edit - My offer still stands, 0.1 btc if I'm Rizzrack's alt or not.  
And I'd appreciate it if you stop addressing me as Rizzrack's alt, without any valid proof other than your tingly spidey teenage girl sense.  Cause if I'd follow your judgement, considering the lack of brain cell power you show,  which of course you've accused saxydev of lacking in that department, I will consider based on your Sherlock Holmes how to make a case guide,  I might assume you're an alt of saxydev.


Edit 2.0 - It appears he's even given me a trust rating based on what his beed sheets looked like this morning.       Ah jeez.... no idea why I decided to post from an alt account in the first place.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 6273
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
So after being offline since Februyary 13th, Rizzrack's alt suddenly wakes up; again, just after he posted from his main account and pretending it's just a coincidence. How sweet!

Look.... you keep contradicting yourself, while you mention in some comments that I'm not Rizzrack's alt

I never mentioned you are not his alt. I mentioned that (1) it's possible for you to be his alt and (2) that it doesn't matter if you are, or not, his alt.

In any case, as I also wrote once more,

In any case, no matter if coincollector12is his alt or not

Do you understand this? It does not matter if you are his alt or not.

I don't know how you read texts, but I think I was very clear.

I promise I'll take the time in the following days to address your questions

Ohhh I must feel blessed! Thanks for this sign of generosity! However, be careful that you read with attention those questions, meaning word by word, in order to make sure you understand what I asked and avoid embarrassing yourself like you did until now, when you either said something which I did not say or you made another Houdini move, just like saxydev did.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 1


Rizzrack's alt also did not have the guts for answering my questions. All good.




Look.... you keep contradicting yourself, while you mention in some comments that I'm not Rizzrack's alt, you also proceed in putting up retarded comments such as this one where your detective skills clearly figured it all out.

I promise I'll take the time in the following days to address your questions,  though I'm pretty sure you'll find a way to take things out of context so they fit your Sherlock Holmes narative.
copper member
Activity: 763
Merit: 692
Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com
...dumb shitpost...



No use arguing with someone who gets paid to reply so... welcome to the ignore list. Get comfortable ! It's gonna be a while  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 6273
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
considering that about 60 hours passed since our Prince charming went to have his his "brb" beauty sleep,

Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs

it means that in 12h at max from now on the beauty will wake up and clear things up again, as he always does.

Holy Mother of God!



I was wrong! How can it be?

It's been already 204 hours and our prince charming is still sleeping! Is sleeping beauty feeling well?

It's hard to understand how such an active businessman can sleep so much... Who runs the businesses in his place? It is possible though to actually assist to the Houdini move?

c0ldbrewz, I guess his "financial department" still did not reach you yet? If so, maybe they have a problem with their Internet connection or with phone lines... Perhaps saxydev is working his ass out right now, harvesting some strawberries at an Italian or Spanish farm, for obtaining your 90$? (It may take a while though; although the amount seems small it is, in fact huge!)

Meanwhile, Rizzrack's alt still did not support your flag so Rizzrack must have mixed feelings for supporting it. In part, he is still supporting the scammer, as he opposed the flag created for scamming dkbit98. Watching forum staff officially supporting scammers can only bring confidence to all users.

Rizzrack's alt also did not have the guts for answering my questions. All good.

legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 6273
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Based on the chat logs, it was saxydev who decided to make the XMR payment, as expected.

Yes, no wonder about that. I don't understand why he did not propose to send the money in an envelope, using regular mail, then blame the mail system for losing the precious envelope, containing the 90$, which was personally taken to the mail box by the Head of his "financial department".

Even if he did send the payment (that's a big IF) and then deleted the wallet or lost access to it for whatever reason

I guess we all know that chances for this to have happened are merely none.

[...] and he later restores the wallet from the mnemonic seed, he will no longer have access to the secret TX key of the transaction. This is because the key can only be obtained from the local wallet used to create the transaction. But I bet he didn't know that, as he repeated the same lie in the Discord chat

Well, considering that about 60 hours passed since our Prince charming went to have his his "brb" beauty sleep,

Going to sleep, brb 48-72 hrs

it means that in 12h at max from now on the beauty will wake up and clear things up again, as he always does.

Kind of ironic considering this is the same guy who was offering his blockchain forensics services to the community.  Cheesy

Lol!



thanks guys for your support, really appreciated it.

Welcome! It seems now that both flags have enough support. Furthermore, yours is also supported by the fan-of scammers, which is very interesting. He forgot to support the flag from his alt though.




yes, it was saxydev who decided want to pay me in XMR.
and as a freelancer who desperate to earn, i accepted it and created xmr address.

Now the harm is done... In the future make sure you properly analysis of entire situation, before accepting a deal.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
thanks guys for your support, really appreciated it.

yes, it was saxydev who decided want to pay me in XMR.
and as a freelancer who desperate to earn, i accepted it and created xmr address.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2493
Top Crypto Casino
One question for you c0ldbrewz, since you said that you don't know much about monero, who exactly asked for payment for your work to be sent in XMR instead of BTC or some other coin?

I have to confess that this question also popped into my mind.

Based on the chat logs, it was saxydev who decided to make the XMR payment, as expected.

I actually made some digging on this matter. And the results are... how to say... fascinating. Apparently, saxydev made another "Houdini move" when he sent the payment to c0ldbrewz, as he managed to pay without having a XMR wallet At least this is what I can understand from this sentence, which I found in the other topic:

I am not going to pay you anything more. What I am going to is next 48 hours [...] to install a monero wallet and share the secret key with the txd.

Since the active businessman scammer said he will install a XMR wallet, this means he did not have one, right? Then taking into consideration that there are infinitesimal chances for him to delete a XMR wallet just after paying to c0ldbrewz (as he would not have any reason to do that), we conclude that he made the payment on Monero network without having a wallet, which is, again, pure magic. Fabulous! Am I missing something here?

Even if he did send the payment (that's a big IF) and then deleted the wallet or lost access to it for whatever reason, and he later restores the wallet from the mnemonic seed, he will no longer have access to the secret TX key of the transaction. This is because the key can only be obtained from the local wallet used to create the transaction. But I bet he didn't know that, as he repeated the same lie in the Discord chat:

what wallet are you using?
do rescan
you should have the function
i am installing a monero wallet and i will give the secret key to check it on blockchain

Kind of ironic considering this is the same guy who was offering his blockchain forensics services to the community.  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 6273
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
One question for you c0ldbrewz, since you said that you don't know much about monero, who exactly asked for payment for your work to be sent in XMR instead of BTC or some other coin?

I have to confess that this question also popped into my mind.

I actually made some digging on this matter. And the results are... how to say... fascinating. Apparently, saxydev made another "Houdini move" when he sent the payment to c0ldbrewz, as he managed to pay without having a XMR wallet At least this is what I can understand from this sentence, which I found in the other topic:

I am not going to pay you anything more. What I am going to is next 48 hours [...] to install a monero wallet and share the secret key with the txd.

Since the active businessman scammer said he will install a XMR wallet, this means he did not have one, right? Then taking into consideration that there are infinitesimal chances for him to delete a XMR wallet just after paying to c0ldbrewz (as he would not have any reason to do that), we conclude that he made the payment on Monero network without having a wallet, which is, again, pure magic. Fabulous! Am I missing something here?
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 6871
after hearing suggestions from some of you guys.
i decided to open flag against saxydev.
fell free to support/oppose the flag.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3112
I supported the flag against saxydev, but I still hope you will receive coins you earned, and I can't wait to hear his reply after he comes back from that mysterious brb holiday vacation.
One question for you c0ldbrewz, since you said that you don't know much about monero, who exactly asked for payment for your work to be sent in XMR instead of BTC or some other coin?
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1323
Shush guys, please don't make any noise as saxydev is having his 48-72h beauty sleep and it would not be nice to disturb poor man from his nap. We all know how hard working he is and that he really needed to rest well.

Let's talk in silence.
I wish my laughter weren't loud so I wouldn't disturb him from his beautiful dreams  Grin maybe he's now dreaming about how to erase his red trusts to deceive more members LOL

@c0ldbrewz Sorry for your loss; you trusted him and worked for his false promises, again do not trust anyone you do not know, or there were no dealings he did with other members, or you can deal through the escrow service until you are sure that this bastard will pay you in the end, so as not to waste your time. There are many members with malicious intentions. One of them had previously contacted me to hire me for his job in return for a large amount of money, and things were going well at first, but soon he sent me links to programs containing Trojans so that I could try them to complete my works with him, but I refused to download and blocked him on discord because he a scammer wants to hack my computer, so we have to be careful.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1372
Yes, I'm an asshole
[...]
the TX private key is what saxydev would provide, he wrote and I quote, "to a trusted person outside the gang of [...] GazetaBitcoin" [...]

If I am, then I'll ask saxydev, do I fall under that criteria? You asked if anyone would do their role as part of the community, and here I am, volunteering purely to get this case closed.

I appreciate your good intentions, but I think that your effort is like asking the "sup fellas gang" to stop spamming. Do you remember the "sup fellas gang"?

Sup holydarkness?  Grin

[...]

Oh LOL, to be completely honest, I forgot about that part. That emoji made me laughed then as it is now.

To saxydev, the posts on that thread was a contribution to the forum, though, and doesn't necessarily mean I'm taking side, or favoring you or whoever involved on this case. I still stand with my offer, if you provide me with the real TxID and the TX private key, I'll report whatever results shown by the data to this forum. If you've really paid the OP and this is a simple misunderstanding, my offer is a good way to clear err... one of the flag raised against you.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 6273
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Shush guys, please don't make any noise as saxydev is having his 48-72h beauty sleep and it would not be nice to disturb poor man from his nap. We all know how hard working he is and that he really needed to rest well.

Let's talk in silence.



the TX private key is what saxydev would provide, he wrote and I quote, "to a trusted person outside the gang of [...] GazetaBitcoin" [...]

If I am, then I'll ask saxydev, do I fall under that criteria? You asked if anyone would do their role as part of the community, and here I am, volunteering purely to get this case closed.

I appreciate your good intentions, but I think that your effort is like asking the "sup fellas gang" to stop spamming. Do you remember the "sup fellas gang"?

Sup holydarkness?  Grin



fell free to support/oppose the flag.

Flag supported from my side as well. Good job, OP!



How desperate do you have to be to steal $90 from someone?

I said in multiple occasions that this pauper is eating dirt from under his fingernails but, however, he seems to be working with "OK amounts" of money:

Information about cyprus banks -- here he was looking for advice on how to move 200.000 euro from a Moldavia bank to an Italian one. I wonder how could this pauper make 200.000 euro...

- banks - thanks thanks, it was an ok ammount from my perspective

You hear that, NotATether? 200.000E are an "Ok amount". From his tone this sounds like "not good, not bad" Smiley So I also do not understand what could possibly happen for him to not be able to pay the 2200$ owed to dkbit98 nor the 90$ owed to OP. His "financial department" also failed to make the payment. Very strange.

Yet after all these, Rizzrack-the-fan-of scammers and his alt accuse me for daring to expose this scammer!

What's the problem here? And you are pointing the finger at me, for starting this thread and having a scammer exposed? Are you out of your mind???



It seems that Elvis has left the building, and I doubt he'll be back.

Lol.

Guess someone found some services in under 15 minutes and had to edit posts before a reply from dkbit arrived.  Damn it, dkbit.  Had you been quicker, this thread would have been so much more fun to follow!  It would have ended as a 'how quickly can saxydev do the Houdini move'

Perhaps he just did "The Houdini move"?

However, he anticipated doing this multiple occasions:

If being against something in this forum is giving the right to someone to accuse, I will leave it.
Be my guest.
Ok. I'm out of this thread

Maybe he just decided to keep his words, as a honorable person which he is.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2493
Top Crypto Casino

Flag supported from my side.

By the way, did anyone notice when he updated his profile page?
It seems that Elvis has left the building, and I doubt he'll be back.
jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 5
after hearing suggestions from some of you guys.
i decided to open flag against saxydev.
fell free to support/oppose the flag.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3112
 Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2493
Top Crypto Casino

Am I correct?

Yes, you are basically right. Except, that TX mentioned earlier is probably not related to this case since the information in screenshots, particularly the block number and timestamp, doesn't match up. "saxydev" claims that the transaction was confirmed in block 2813799 (mined about 10 days ago), and the mentioned TX is part of block 2820718 from a few days ago.


I see. But let's suppose we insist on using that TxID as it's what admitted by saxydev to be the valid TxID, and thus, the complete web address as I wrote above, will entering both entries --the address and the TX private key-- brings us a "false positive", i.e. it will says xxx amount of XMR --equals to 90$-- was indeed sent to OP's address while saxydev actually never send it? Or will it says something like, "invalid data, transaction not found"?

If what'll happen is the latter, then the result itself is conclusive enough that saxydev has never send the payment and brings us to the end of this case.

For the record, saxydev never confirmed that TxID. We inferred this from the screenshots provided by c0ldbrewz. (Which are most likely fabricated to mislead the recipient.)

You can never get a "false positive" result. Either he will give a valid TX ID and TX secret key that will validate the transaction, or you will get an error message such as "the transaction cannot be decrypted," depending on the tool used.
legendary
Activity: 2478
Merit: 1372
Yes, I'm an asshole

Am I correct?

Yes, you are basically right. Except, that TX mentioned earlier is probably not related to this case since the information in screenshots, particularly the block number and timestamp, doesn't match up. "saxydev" claims that the transaction was confirmed in block 2813799 (mined about 10 days ago), and the mentioned TX is part of block 2820718 from a few days ago.


I see. But let's suppose we insist on using that TxID as it's what admitted by saxydev to be the valid TxID, and thus, the complete web address as I wrote above, will entering both entries --the address and the TX private key-- brings us a "false positive", i.e. it will says xxx amount of XMR --equals to 90$-- was indeed sent to OP's address while saxydev actually never send it? Or will it says something like, "invalid data, transaction not found"?

If what'll happen is the latter, then the result itself is conclusive enough that saxydev has never send the payment and brings us to the end of this case.
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 6442
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
...

How desperate do you have to be to steal $90 from someone?

A person wasn't happy with my work, asked for their $50 refund, I sent it back to them no problem. Case was closed.

People have been doing exit scams for much larger amounts recently, but $90 is a very pathetic value to ruin your reputation over. Why not just be frank and settle the transaction?
legendary
Activity: 1526
Merit: 2493
Top Crypto Casino

Am I correct?

Yes, you are basically right. Except, that TX mentioned earlier is probably not related to this case since the information in screenshots, particularly the block number and timestamp, doesn't match up. "saxydev" claims that the transaction was confirmed in block 2813799 (mined about 10 days ago), and the mentioned TX is part of block 2820718 from a few days ago.

If I am, then I'll ask saxydev, do I fall under that criteria? You asked if anyone would do their role as part of the community, and here I am, volunteering purely to get this case closed. I don't think I'm on any gang on this forum, and I would like to call myself --well, self proclaimed as it is-- trustworthy enough. Would you PM me that TX private key which will allows all of us to see the truth behind this case?

Given that saxydev is already caught in a web of his own lies, I highly doubt he will send you any proof. Nonetheless, remain wary of his words, as he may try to weasel his way out once more.

And to any other members, as I am aware that screenshot can be edited, but suppose saxydev kept his words and provide me with the TX private key so that I can confirm that the payment is indeed sent --or didn't sent-- would the screenshot provided by me enough as an evidence? I can assure you all that I won't bother editing the screenshots --aside from cropping and obscuring anything that can be used to identify me-- as whatever shown wouldn't benefits or detrimental to me.

Sure, we can do that. If he gives you the transaction details and you confirm that it's legit, I'll adjust my trust rating based on your word (no need for a screenshot). However, as I have repeatedly pointed out, the transaction details don't reveal any information about the sender, but only the address of the recipient and the amount sent, so there is absolutely no reason not to share this information publicly in terms of privacy. So, there is no material difference between sharing a screenshot of a transaction receipt and a link to a transaction receipt, except that the latter provides verifiable evidence while the former does not.
Pages:
Jump to: