Pages:
Author

Topic: Done with the topic: [New format] Merit Abuser Gang [Now 18-1 cases] - page 2. (Read 2311 times)

copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
member
Activity: 135
Merit: 22
Need a nice avatar, can someone help :-)
Case#14

martina14, anjho.ace, gunhell16 , cherryganda , kram31 , lovesybitz ,
rockyfeller , shandiem14 , benalexis12 , Viscera , vincentong17 , jpoker272727 , hackzang12 , Bobby park , ivanst776

 
martina14 merit summary
Received
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Thanks to the OP for helping eliminate those abusers here in the forum they obviously farming merit as what I have viewed in OP's report.
Appreciate your kind word BTCeminjas

This case is an example of what you said. I struggled a lot because of a language I do not understand. In case#13 I might find more users connected if I would understand the language.
PS: The analysts was done yesterday (15th April)



Case#13
laogeyi123, NeverArgueWithWF, urz42409966, huweiooo, shixd8899

Added on 16thApril: bluesky338


laogeyi123's merit summary
Received
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 23
Nowadays merit abusers are got smarter, mostly they do abuse their merit in local boards section because they know that it's hard to spot to the DT members and moderators their illegal activity here in the forum.
Thanks to the OP for helping eliminate those abusers here in the forum they obviously farming merit as what I have viewed in OP's report.

Keep up the good work. Grin
They are tagging already.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
I moved a part of the original post (below contents)for better formatting of the original post.

Case#1
Joe-Niner, BarkingHawk and SparkyU should really have an explanation!!!  Shocked

Joe-Niner's merit summary
Received
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Case#12
mankeen, CryptoNine, Mr.Coinzer, SaaM78


mankeen's merit summary
Received
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 1
Hi , I have a good catch here
This guy send merit to his alt
Suspects:


1-   Mankeen

Used this wallet

0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc

In this post

 
https://i.imgur.com/GBgNzeV.png

And this wallet :
 
بالضبط ما هو استخدام بلوكشين للمشروع، وما هو الحل هو أنه يجلب أو ما هي المشكلة هو تحديد، ما هي قيمة أنها جلب إلى كريبتو.

Translation:

قبل 9 سنوات، بيتكوين بدأت على فكرة مماثلة لجعل المعاملات أكثر كفاءة والباقي هو التاريخ. ولكن توكن بيتكوين  يختلف في حقيقة أنه في حين أنه يهدف إلى جعل المعاملات أكثر كفاءة، بل هو أيضا عملة مجتمعية.
Translation
Quote
9 years ago, Bitcoin started a similar idea to make transactions more efficient and the rest is history. But Bitcoin is different in the fact that while it aims to make transactions more efficient, it is also a community coin.

And Finally , Mr.Coinzer gives merit to Mankeen
I think the 3 accounts are for the same person

And here is the proof from Ether scan

Mankeen: 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654

Mr.Coinzer: 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc
                 0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32

Etherscan Txn 1
Etherscan Txn 2
Etherscan Txn 3


3 transaction for Mankeen and Coinzer Wallets
Quote
Mankeen- 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654
Mr.Coinzer - 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc


And


Etherscan Txn 1
Etherscan Txn 2
Etherscan Txn 3

Quote
0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654
0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32


copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Case#11
xbiv2, JNiks_ZLisa


JNiks_ZLisa's merit summary
Received
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Case#10
trumpman, Flodner

Clue: 34 merit sent today 26th march 2018 at 11:48:36 AM  from trumpman to Flodner for this topic.


trumpman's merit summary
Received
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
1) The merits which got wasted in the whole process. Is there anything being done to compensate for those merit points ? I am sure that the admin must have thought about creating a system in accordance with the number of merits required to be in circulation. Did he consider these abuses cases while panning that ?

He's been increasing the number of Merits available through the sources.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;stats=sources

2) Why not have some restriction related to the maximum number of merits allowed per post ?

There is a restriction of a maximum 50 Merit that can be awarded by one account to another account per month.
jr. member
Activity: 132
Merit: 1
it is actions such that deprive newbies (who honestly make valid contributions) from gaining merits,the merit system should be improved upon to make it fairer especially to new comers

Yes, we are  missing an important point related to merit abuse. It is good that genuine members are giving their time to find out remembers abusing the merit system and then reporting it but what about:

1) The merits which got wasted in the whole process. Is there anything being done to compensate for those merit points ? I am sure that the admin must have thought about creating a system in accordance with the number of merits required to be in circulation. Did he consider these abuses cases while panning that ?

2) Why not have some restriction related to the maximum number of merits allowed per post ?
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
If you clearly understood how merit works than you would not have made this thread, eventually account farmers/traders will run out of merit and it won't be possible to do.

I just hope that this merit thing is transferred over to the new fourm

If he can get any of them tagged red then there will be fewer spammers polluting the forum. That's got to make it worthwhile. Sure they'll run out of sMerit, but why not take the opportunity to get rid of a few of them?
hero member
Activity: 2254
Merit: 960
100% Deposit Match UP TO €5000!
If you clearly understood how merit works than you would not have made this thread, eventually account farmers/traders will run out of merit and it won't be possible to do.

I just hope that this merit thing is transferred over to the new fourm
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Case#9
big.pharaoh, mohamed reda, LBX, hamade possible merit farmer.


hamade's merit summary
Received
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
This piece of work left wondering how on earth the author managed to collect 50 Merit.

they add cloudflare to protect the fourm from Dos attake
your words is true but added the cloudeflare better than Fourm will Down


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1123153
Merit: 150
Sent in the last 120 days

    February 07, 2018, 08:47:20 PM: 10 to LBX for Re: ما هي عملة Ebch ومنصة CoinPulse القادمة وهل ينصح الدخو
    February 07, 2018, 01:11:40 AM: 18 to LBX for رايكم في مستقبل عملة zcoin
    January 28, 2018, 03:15:45 PM: 1 to hugeblack for متطلبات جديدة لترقية العضوية

Received in the last 120 days

    February 07, 2018, 01:13:15 AM: 20 from LBX for Re: يا اخواني ساعدوني
    February 07, 2018, 01:10:21 AM: 10 from LBX for Re: هل يجب اضافة كل توكين لمحفظة الاثيريوم
    February 07, 2018, 01:08:18 AM: 10 from LBX for Re: شروط الاستفادة من توكن WAVES ?
    February 07, 2018, 01:07:57 AM: 10 from LBX for Re: شروط الاستفادة من توكن WAVES ?
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Case#8
NetFreak199, visionary, chixka000, identifyuser, alexberezov, Rexxxem, jk9694, dumbtool45, number37, blo8i


Ref:
Account related:

chixka000: 0xAaEedA078AcF2e037FFf742c564dc11eBa815b7f
identifyuser: 0x8Ede1DbeeCde0AE2859f9735cA0470c8210c0e0C
NetFreak199: 0x822d9cd5b86391cdb5e4743089b8cc9f964195bf
alexberezov: 0x55515EDbe90d7d8f29De195E13D02bB43f9Ee8f0


The above connection bought these whole lot...

visionary: https://prnt.sc/iw24yx
NetFreak199: https://prnt.sc/iw25d4
blo8i: https://prnt.sc/iw25nt
Rexxxem: https://prnt.sc/iw269y
jk9694: https://prnt.sc/iw26tn
dumbtool45: https://prnt.sc/iw275a
number37: https://prnt.sc/iw27fu
chixka000: https://prnt.sc/iw29u8
identifyuser: https://prnt.sc/iw2a4m
alexberezov: https://prnt.sc/iw2ad9

Tagged all of them to keep log.

By the nice work and deserved one merit from me.

Clearly these users are exchanging merits to each others: NetFreak199, visionary, chixka000, identifyuser, alexberezov, Rexxxem, jk9694, dumbtool45, number37, blo8i
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
Case#7
StallionMosquito - Sr. Member, zohaibh - Full Member, imrobo2 - Full Member
network with => gmughals - Member, ateebshaikh290 - Member, cheechu - Member.

StallionMosquito's merit summary
Received
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
Hey mdayonliner. I think you'll be very interested in this one Smiley). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=878336

I don't have enough proof to conclude that they're alt accounts but I think this is very weirdo when this Sr. Member send so many Merit points to other account with lower rank in just a short time.

If they're not alts then it has been bought which is equally untrustworthy behaviour.
member
Activity: 238
Merit: 10
OPEN GAMING PLATFORM
Hey mdayonliner. I think you'll be very interested in this one Smiley). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=878336

I don't have enough proof to conclude that they're alt accounts but I think this is very weirdo when this Sr. Member send so many Merit points to other account with lower rank in just a short time.
jr. member
Activity: 187
Merit: 2
The system is indeed abused by a lot of users who are forming their own secret clans to help each other.

It is enough just to look at the list of posts being merited to think, very often.. "WTF? This silly post deserves a merit?"

I am sorry to repeat here a concept that I have also expressed somewhere else, but in my opinion the ONLY solution to make sure that the quality of the posts is increased without giving all the power to do that to the members (who, as documented here are forming their own clans to help each other out) is a STRONGER, TOUGHER moderation.

A stronger moderation policy cannot be easily cheated.

All that is needed is something like "you post crap. I delete your post and give you a warning for doing it. After x warnings for the same reason (let's pretend it's maximum 4 warnings for posting crap) I ban your account PERMANENTLY".

As simple as that.

That would work much better as a deterrent than this absurd merit system whose power is left entirely in the hands of the members to happily abuse with and also it would not penalize newbies.

Just my two cents.

It is certainly a good idea but is it practical to implement ? I mean we already see the staff being busy handling those " Report to moderator" submissions and various other forum activities. Most of these are doing these voluntarily without getting any monetary compensation. It would be wrong to expect from them to work full time on this as they might be having jobs/businesses tp arrange their living expenses. Members do try to help sometimes by reporting cases but we need regular moderation.
Pages:
Jump to:
© 2020, Bitcointalksearch.org