Topic: Don't buy facemasks for the coronavirus! - page 10. (Read 7269 times)

I agree the facemasks are mostly in place to protect others from ourself. It's a form of respect to other people when we go shopping or are in close environments. We can't be certain if we are carrying the virus within us or not, because sometimes the symptons are very mild. It doesn't hurt anybody to wear a mask and you might be saving lifes with that. There is no reason not do it.
No need to buy any fancy masks, you can just buy locally produced cheap face masks that can be washed. It's a one time purchase.

There was a huge rally of the Undiapered in Madrid, attended by thousands, who are tired of being told they're sick and ordered to behave as if they were.

And when police tried to Hut! Hut! Hut! a woman who wasn't wearing a Diaper, people came to her defense, forcing the Diaperers to back off.

Resistance is spreading.

It is all really good news – which probably explains why it isn't being reported by the American press.

Spanish police attempt to arrest a woman not wearing a mask

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=px2b318tUEQ

Which seems to want to report nothing but bad news – even when it has to be made up.

In order to efface the good news.

The most egregious example of this, of course, being the daily hyperventilating over "the cases!" the cases!" and "hot spots" of "cases!" The implication – never directly stated but heavily implied – is that a "case" is tantamount to death, or at least, an illness so serious that it will require medical attention to recover from it.

But the fact is that almost all the "cases" being reported don't even have symptoms.

This is a disease so deadly people only occasionally get sick from it. And of those who do get seriously sick, almost all of them, according to the CDC, "had one or more underlying conditions such as chronic lung disease, diabetes, cardiovascular disease or hypertension."

Maybe better be to consider use face shield it more safe and comfort, you can use it for the formal eventvtoo. Because if we use face mask just for stopping the virus from our self to other people it safe.

The Diapers by themselves are loathsome. People wearing them look like neurotics – the same neurotics. Diapers efface individuality. They turn people into NPC characters in a sick actual reality game.

They are alienating, unhealthy – medically and psychologically.

But they are more than merely Diapers – as ought to be apparent.

Given that there is no persuasive medical reason to wear a Face Diaper (much less a dirty bandana) the obvious conclusion is that the insistence on covering the face is to efface the face. To submerge the individual into a collective of faceless, interchangeable players who have surrendered their individuality for the sake of obedience

Diapers are training tools.

They are meant to habituate people to the "new normal" – which will include management by the corporate-government nexus to a degree we probably can't yet fully comprehend. Diaper acceptance will lead to Needling acceptance, which will not even require laws.

All that it will take is policies – as per Diapers.

The same corporations which deny service to the Undiapered will deny service – and employment – to those who refuse the vaccine. People who don't submit will simply be excluded, as now. No job, no shop. Perhaps no food. They will be herded onto reservations of a sort – i.e., their homes, which they won't be allowed to leave or rather which there will be no point in leaving since there's nowhere to go and nothing to do.

The corporate-government nexus will wait you out – perhaps starve you out.

It will be almost impossible to resist unless you go Amish. Those who aren't able to live on virtually no income,  who can produce their own food, etc. will be the only holdouts.

Everyone else who works for a company – which is almost everyone – will be required to submit to the Needle just as they have been forced to submit to the Diaper, which they submitted to because they had already submitted to things like mandatory drug tests as a condition of employment – which they had to submit to, since all employers require them now, just about.

No laws needed.

Corporations – and policies – have replaced laws.

This is ingenious. And it isn't new.

After nahhhhnlevven and even before then, as the development of technology made possible the unimaginable, the federal government figured out that it could bypass aggravations such as the laws which restricted to some degree what it could do to the people – for example, mass surveil them – by having private contractors do the dirty work instead. Some will recall the private armies of mercenaries- and torturers – created under the auspice of Blackwater as a for-instance. What the U.S. Army couldn't do, the goons of Blackwater could.

Fast forward twenty years.

The government doesn't censor speech. But private companies are very effectively suppressing it – which amounts to the same as these private companies have near-monopoly control of the means by which information is disseminated. To paraphrase what der Stellvertreter once said of his boss: Gurgle ist communication just as communication ist Gurgle!

No laws needed to "de-platform" or "de-monetize" you. The First Amendment still applies – but only to the government. How much free speech do you have at work? Ask the people who work at Goodyear.

In our city you should wear both or else you gonna pay for fines. Both wearing face mask and face shield are necessary when going out of your home. But most people in our village don't really follow these instructions because they are not aware of the consequences. But those who are going to the City proper are strictly following the protocols.


 

Maybe better be to consider use face shield it more safe and comfort, you can use it for the formal eventvtoo. Because if we use face mask just for stopping the virus from our self to other people it safe.

There are two directions to go end the pandemic:

Instead of titting around with rubbish restrictions that reduce the build up of immunity, they should be working to create a healthier population by reducing the use of refined sugars and seed oils ( for example ). Banning smoking and damaging pharmaceuticals would be a great help as well.

Nobody can deny that Covid is a highly infectious virus, but it is a fairly minor health risk, and so far no healthy person has died from it. In fact the Corona virus has been around in some form since the 1930s, and we have lived and thrived despite this, It seems that the 2002/3 SARS virus has given over half of the UK population  immunity from its effects, and this is why we have so few deaths from it despite an exponential increase in infections. Instead of titting around with rubbish restrictions that reduce the build up of immunity, they should be working to create a healthier population by reducing the use of refined sugars and seed oils ( for example ). Banning smoking and damaging pharmaceuticals would be a great help as well.

...
but I just want to provide factual information about what happened in my country, and I don't really know what is happening in other countries. there is a pulmonologist who is very young and has no history of any disease, when he contracted coivd-19 he was not helped and died.
...

This is real and cannot be denied and there are many incidents in my country where medical personnel have fallen, even though they are healthy and young. so conclusions cannot be drawn equally for all the criteria that occur.

Nobody can deny that Covid is a highly infectious virus, but it is a fairly minor health risk, and so far no healthy person has died from it. In fact the Corona virus has been around in some form since the 1930s, and we have lived and thrived despite this, It seems that the 2002/3 SARS virus has given over half of the UK population  immunity from its effects, and this is why we have so few deaths from it despite an exponential increase in infections. Instead of titting around with rubbish restrictions that reduce the build up of immunity, they should be working to create a healthier population by reducing the use of refined sugars and seed oils ( for example ). Banning smoking and damaging pharmaceuticals would be a great help as well.