The earlier we understand that bitcoin is not for everyone, the better because it saves us the time and energy that we would have used to convince those who are uninterested, to move on to those who are interested and it can also drive adoption faster. I've read some threads here of some people trying to convince their family members on the positives of Bitcoin and get enraged if the said members don't share the same opinion as them but I feel everyone is entitled to his opinion and while some regard Bitcoin with outright disgust like Charlie Munger, there are some who care less of it's existence.
Bitcoiners have the opportunity to stand for something and that's eliminating the need for central authorities such as the government and banks and rather than forcing everyone to confirm to their beliefs, it's better to find an audience worth serving. What's your take, guys?
Everything has a pros and cons, so it is impossible for everyone to receive bitcoin too, like I say that you are handsome, not necessarily people agree with my expression about you, this is a basic logic, so we don't need to force what we are Know and we believe to others, it will make it a conflict between relationships with each other because of differences in opinions.
No one tells us to spread Bitcoin and to be accepted by your family or environment, even Satoshi does not tell you to do that.
But the usefulness we get from Bitcoin is certainly a goodness to us, and the initiative to spread it certainly does not become a wrong action, so that others also get the good of the existence of Bitcoin, but by imposing bitcoin on others is the wrong action, you only Need to try it, and do not care about the results, if anyone is interested then you must guide it, if not there, then don't force it.
But for some people who like the anonymity of Bitcoin ownership and do not like that other people know you have bitcoin, silence is a solution.