Topic: Doxxed team can help a new gambling platform? - page 2. (Read 829 times)

What difference does it even make? Just because the team won't hide their faces doesn't mean that they won't cheat their users in the future. At worst, they'll just lose their license, that's all. And to be frank, most casinos are sub-licensed.

A good question. But the casino often shows us a big part of data - license, the owner, address, etc. One more question - how it can help the gambler? The most time the ToS have several paragraphs that allow them to ban account any moment and the gambler can do nothing with it. The second moment is that casino works like the bank. They deposit and withdraw your money. Do you often see bank that shows their KYC verification? I don`t think so.

Privacy has been a very core thing of interest and a case of concern of recent times in the gambling industry and most times I think it will be more better that the team stays anonymous at least for their safety and most times this KYC issues should be more related to the licensing bodies who gave the license to the casino.

We've also heard about some casinos in the past who claimed to be doxxed and still yet ends up messing up the trust and credibility so even if it is doxxed or not, it doesn't make any sense  to me.

It is unlikely that a gambling platform would be more attractive to users if the team were entirely "doxxed," meaning that their personal information was publicly revealed.
It would have an adverse effect, as the site would be no more trustworthy.

Most times When a project comes on air and say that their team is doxxed I do not bother myself with them because that is not what my concern is. I really do not pay attention to the issue of project team being doxxed or not whether casino or otherwise what I really look at is their license because that I where the identities of the ownership of the project lies. Since they have Government issued certificate to operate, it means that the government is fully aware of their presence and business so getting them anything and any day would not be an issue but as long as they are delivering their services to desired satisfaction, I have no problem with the casino because I can easily get them.

True. This is why most gambling sites think twice before sharing any of their private details with the public. They end up relying on licenses to help prove their legitimacy ultimately.

Many crypto sites used this particular strategy to scam the public and ran away without a second thought(HYIP scams etc).

And if only the regulator knew the profile of the casino owner and the team behind the casino, we couldn't do anything about it. Maybe the regulations from the regulator are already like that. But if we have any problems, we can directly contact the regulators to help solve our problems, especially if, in this case, the casino doesn't want to pay our winnings and let the regulators force the casino. I also feel fine with the identity of the casino owner that I don't know because they must have their own reasons that make them unable to tell the public. And as long as the casino can pay out my winnings fairly without asking me to do many requirements and making it more complicated, that would be better for me.

What???

I did not say that more casinos = problem. My point was, that having a doxxed team wont be a a huge benefit for gamblers to join OP's friends casino. The point was, that among 1000 casinos, it is useless to tell that we have a doxxed team, come join us instead of 999 others. Being doxxed does not make you special. Example - we knows lots of identities of hackers and scammers, and we cant do much about it. To get customers to new casino, doxxed team is not enough. Casino must offer something others dont. That is a simple business rule.

So actually, the identity of the casino owner is not a problem whether you want to be published or not because it will depend on how the casino can provide good service and comfort for gamblers to play gambling.
This is a business and when people can benefit from it, they will not care who owns it or the team from the casino because they already feel the benefits.
Of the many existing casino platforms, we see which are really serious about running their casinos in providing good service to their members.
And maybe it's also why many gamblers don't want to know too much about the team behind the casino and want to gamble and earn from the casino.

In business, transparency matters alot as it tells who you are and what you tend to be in the long run. Being transparent keeps your customers and shows them how reliable and trustworthy you and your business is. When seen as a person or business of such, that attracts more clients because already that has done the marketing for you through your clients because they would make recommendations for your own benefit.



It is true that some do reveal their information with good intentions while some plans to carrying out nefarious act which is not a good one. Being transparent do let people see the inward aspect of things and knowing what to do at the right time so as to avoid any ill situations.


Building a trust line isn't a bed of roses. It takes time to do so based on your records milestones achieved and that will also work when you have been available for letting ng delivering Services without any complaint and also, quick response to customers complaints and inquiries with positive results and response overtime.



And the approval which they seek for through that means would not be acknowledged by the community even if they have field the best team for the casino. Reputation takes time to build based on your services rendered. No body builds a house in one day. Everything is a gradual process which involves time and commitment.

Yes it is but at least in those popular casino here in our humble forum? the chance of being addressed properly ?  and of course the gambling community here will push the site to act accordingly not like to those who have no big names here that can just deny answering those issues and may end up scamming to the players trust .
and also negative reviews can be verified but also there are people that only wanted to ruin site reputation so lets be aware of those issues.

We have different kinds of casinos platform and all the casino platform and can say that they are into competition so it is the platform that I have benefit from easy people in the platform that people will patronize or work with so all these things is like a market competition when do you have not set up your platform very well it is when you have a difficultie in your platform

I don't see any problem for more casinos to enter the market since you will.need to have a good product for gamblers to keep patronizing you brand and coming to your casino. Business is all about competition and any product or brand that are not ready for competition would fall aside without having continueous traffic from players.

I guess regulated casinos (which require KYC from users) aren't anonymous. You have to investigate their licenses, so you will find more informations of where their headquarters is located, who is the responsible individual for the business, etc... Staff team doesn't expose themselves on their casino's website and social medias, but with some further research I believe it's possible to find the details you are looking for, because they shouldn't be completely hidden too.

It's really not how it works. You have a pretty naive viewpoint if you think the staff of a financial company would expose themselves in such a way and why should people in a company not have privacy? KYC is designed to prevent financial abuse, it is not intended to share private information with the world. These companies and many even regulators in some countries might expect to see such personal details, but it is not fair and no worker would stick around to be put at risk like that. It's a complete liability to regular employees and would put them at much greater risk of things like kidnapping or blackmail if their information was shared, for no discernible benefit to anyone.

Yes, because how many times have you seen projects stating that their team is a doxxed one?
And yet, they still end up screwing their investors. It is not anymore an assurance that they will do things right.
So even with gambling sites stating that their team is doxxed, they won't gain the credibility right away.
It is thru the years how they will build their reputation in this business. A matter of years of existence where complaints are being handled promptly.
Sometimes I feel that a project stating that their team is doxxed just wanted to get an approval from the community without so much effort, but people already learned their lessons in this market.

Agreed. Transparency is important but it's just one aspect of building trust. It's not a silver bullet. Doing things like having fair games, prompt payouts and proper security measures goes a long way in gaining the trust of players. Doxxing the whole team might not be the solution, but a combination of various factors can help establish credibility and build trust with players. But let's be clear: there's no easy way to gain people's trust, and making all your information public could have just as many (if not more) pitfalls as benefits.

What well known popular casino exactly you are describing because it’s impossible for them to operate freely without a negative feedback on their trust score here in the forum. A case that not paying winner with valid proof is enough for them to be tagged as scammer. Are you sure the proof is valid because some complaints provide proof of withdrawal while the user itself violates the casino ToS which is the main reason why they are not being paid. Most of the complaints online provide only a cut proof to make the casino looks like a scam.

Crypto gambling sites don't need to be completely transparent, but they need to be transparent to some extent in order to gain the trust of the public.

Some sites reveal their information to the public with good intentions while some other sites do so with nefarious intentions. Being transparent doesn't automatically translate to a trustworthy site.

Trust is earned little by little in various ways. This is why I feel that the team getting 100% doxxed won't solve the KYC issue.

It is true that a casino's reputation is vital in keeping patron trust. Being open about ownership and displaying the ability to pay out large winnings will boost player trust and confidence. However, balancing transparency and owner privacy is a complex subject that must be handled with care to prevent jeopardizing the casino's reputation.
To maintain fairness and honesty, a licensed casino must follow all applicable rules and regulations. Casino owners may choose to cover their identities for security reasons, but this might have an impact on player trust. Balancing privacy and transparency is a sensitive problem that is ultimately determined by the circumstances.