Topic: Doxxed team can help a new gambling platform? - page 5. (Read 892 times)

Interesting but If it's only the name of the company then that means the members of that company can still run away if they have done something inappropriate but there are really a crypto project who has a doxxed team however this doesn't removed the fact that they can't turned bad anymore. We already have many cases about it. What happened with do kwoon and SBF are a few of it. Not all customers hate KYC and that is why there are still platforms who take the risk and require a KYC.

This is better than if their company won't look legal to the governments. So those who hate KYC and only plays on a non-KYC casino should be wary of that because the platform can be shut down at anytime if ever they are spotted by the governments.

Not everyone feel safe to talk about crypto in public. It's a choice they make, most of us on the forum made the choice. Others should be respectful to it.
 

They are not asking you to gamble with them. You are going there by your choice. You have options to avoid them.

To have KYC or not for a gambling casino owner its the same things since they still don't have trust score to look forward with since if they scam people they provably do it even if there identity is totally expose. Its just casino owners need to prove that they are running good business by providing quality platform to people who want to test out their casino and then a attentive personal who can help them out to their questions and issues then here they can slowly earn some good reputation to the consumers.

I think only casino owners have to KYC with regulators because casino owners are responsible for their own casinos. And if something bad happens, say someone is carrying out illegal activities in the casino, the casino owner will be summoned and held accountable for why this happened. For other casino teams, I don't think they need to verify because they are not the owners but the regulator can also ask all members of the casino to do KYC. It depends on the regulator's policy to implement KYC for everyone behind the casino.

What makes a casino famous, has a good reputation and is recommended by many gamblers is that they can serve gamblers who gamble at their place so that the casino can get lots of gamblers who play gambling. This is because the casino can provide the best service for its members, which cannot be provided by a casino that only thinks about profits.

It will affects the likes of Vitalik Buterin, and others that come out to the public like Cardano CEO for example? Or that's because these projects are Centralised projects?

Can a crypto gambling project be centralized? If a crypto gambling team decides to remain anonymous then why are they requesting KYC from their users? They understand what anonymity means and users wish to remain anonymity as well. They remain anonymous only yo collect users KYC details. Well thank you all for opinions.

I suppose a small amount of gamblers will care, but this detail does not appear to be critical, what gamblers care about the most are fast withdrawals, a good reputation, a lax attitude when it comes to asking for your personal information, constant bonuses and a fast customer support.

And while there are other aspects which are important those five are the most critical, everything else while important will not change the decision of a gambler to create an account at a casino, and I imagine the owners of the casino being open about who they are is not an important detail in the mind of most gamblers.

$5 wrench attack on the casino owner? For what? It's not like they're walking around with the casino's entire bankroll in their pocket. And let's be real, all physical business owners handling large sums of cash are in the same boat.

It will probably help since this sounds more like a marketing stunt to me. You have to ask if it is worth risking the security of the owners in revealing their identity over the "fairness on KYC". I'm thinking of a $5 wrench attack if a gambler is near the area of the owner.

I think the team are known through their licensing and that in itself is enough KYC, before a casino license is approved, there are certain documents and criteria that the team and operators will provide to the authority and those documents contain all the information that is enough for knowing your customer (KYC).
So casino teams are KYC oriented bit just that their own KYC may differ from that of an ordinary players who want to register on the casino to play a few games

Personally, from my experience, several casinos don't just ask users to submit kyc documents, it is the users action that triggers the kyc system..
For example, it's either the user is suspected to be carrying out some illegal activities, like trying to cheat the casino, or maybe the gambler is withdrawing an amount of money, which the casino, under regulatory order, is required to know the gambler, in order to avoid money laundry.

On the order hand, I don't think it's necessary for casino owners to make their identity public, though this casino make the casino gain some quick trust from the gambling community, but doing this could turn out to be a bad idea in the long run considering the fact that crypto regulations and way of taxing is not clear yet most especially..

To be 100% doxxed isn't good for anyone, but it is good for the business when the team shows their real face. I mean they don't have to be doxxed, that could be a risk for them if some sensitive information like their phone or their address is exposed, but if they provide their real name and a photo that would be enough to get the users' trust.

Making online casino ownership  subject to kyc is not the issue and if I may ask what if the kyc turns out to be fake what would you do? Would it not be better you going for a government licensed casino registered and known under a legal jurisdiction than just mere online kyc which you are not sure if the ownership are hiding under pretence to get members registered on their platform and after a while they do away with their customers funds. So which so you prefer?


One of the things I do check for casinos online these days is the Government issued license to operate within her jurisdiction. That alone can grant me proper verification on that casino to know how legit it is because the Government would not want her citizens or foreign citizens  to get defrauded by fraudsters online claiming to be a legit platform so they would definitely reply you if you do write them to verify anything they issued a license to operate within their jurisdiction.

As a business online Casino should make it subject to KYC regulations because it's about the customer's money. So that customers can reduce the level of fraud on the casino platform and also try to build customer trust in Online Casino services. Because it is important, there are many issues of corporate fraud that do not have a license.

Actually Making KYC good for Online Casinos is, in fact, increasingly important for casinos to integrate to stay ahead.

The crotch can be seen here https://withpersona.com/blog/the-importance-of-kyc-for-online-gambling

Like I said earlier, it is not necessary that the casino team must be kyc for all to know who they are. Getting license alone is enough to know that they are legit because only government approved agencies issues license and before that is done, the details of the ownership of the casino is already taken which means that the casino is already kyc and that is enough to go with in confirming that this team or the casino  is legit.  Before a license is issued out by government, verification exercise must have been conducted on the people coming for it. So there is no way government would issue license without knowing whom they are issuing it to and what the license is issued for.




Getting a government approval speaks of great volume than mere kyc which might likely be shabby and turns out to be a scam by which the team are issuing fake kyc just to deceive people on getting them to register on their platform. These are the traps unsuspecting participants fall into and loose their lard earned resources.

I would prefer a government license for verification since it is verifiable by all than the team giving me a doxx kyc claiming to be genuine kyc.  do not by into that.

I think as long as the casino itself is licensed correctly, you can be sure that the business is legitimate. A KYC of the team itself is less dependable in my eyes than a government approval. And you have to ask yourself who is doing the KYC procedure in the first place and how legit they are. So, KYC is BS.

So if you are worried about that kind of "proof" in order to ensure that the casino you choose is not a scam, then a license, which is government approved and publically verifiable would be a better proof than a "doxx" of members who may or may not be real or not (they may be real people with fake ID and forged government papers in order to hide their real identity.)

You have a point, but we are talking about online and it happens to be a casino where people are putting money, and some gamblers are complaining about getting scammed, by getting the online operators doxxed, they know who to deal with and who they will be posted as scammers and this will harm the reputation of the owners, so far no casino operators undergo KYC to prove that they are the owners and responsible for its operations and actions, and the gambling industry and community are ok with it.

There is nothing wrong in you helping a friend to build his or her own gambling project. As a matter of fact, you have down well to this extent of making enquiries here and receiving response from high ranked members onboard this platform but that is not enough though because saying it would not be enough. Your friend i believe has a prototype of want he or she wants the casino to look like and the features too. It would be nice the team starts doing their work and making it presence known here by creating an announcement thread formally introducing the casino so that participants can do a review then you and your friend can proceed with updating or upgrading the casino to the required level it ought to be based on the review results.



Wether the team is kyc verified or not it does not really matter though but service delivery is what matters most. If you drive satisfaction from their services without any complaint, why need  wanting to know who they are.  Do not forget that casinos do obtain license and before such would be done, the team is already known so I believe the government issuing license to the casino already know who they are so that should not be what customers should be bothered about because if anything goes wrong, they would be fished out.


That should not be an issue though but it will also be an advantage to the casino because if they do that they may likely get more participants as people see that as a sign of transparency and accountability and another is, if any of the team member has been involved in a successful project before which is well known, that person would stand the chance of getting more participants to the casino.

Their information might not be available to the public because of security and other hazard reasons but I think they are required to submit their KYC in getting a license to operate a casino. This means they performed KYC but it isn't for public eyes. I see no attractiveness on a doxxed casino team, Even if I were to able to choose to the casino I regularly play over the doxxed casino, I would certainly choose the casino I regularly play because of the certain trust I gave to them. I believe that being doxxed is only effective on investments since a start up project doesn't have that much to show off on in making their potential clients trust them aside from giving them their own identity.

A casino owner will be putting himself at risk if he adds his name to the casino website with all his details. You'll have to be considerate of that just as you don't want to submit KYC documents but the casino has no choice but to ask users for KYC because they are regulated by the government and they have to comply.

  - First of all, every gambling platform has rules and policy agreements, we as gamblers in a casino are free to choose if we agree or disagree with the policy or trend that a casino has. Now, if we accept this, then in the end we will also be against the number one we cheated ourselves.

Besides, when it comes to the team being doxxed? who is the happy gambler with a normal mind that when the team is in an unethical or illegal method he will side with it? Of course, the answer is, it will not be attractive to gamblers or players in the gambling industry.