Pages:
Author

Topic: ✅ DuckDice.io 🎲 Rakeback 🎲 Races 🎲 Faucet 🎲 Deposit Bonus 🎲 Jackpot 🎲 - page 23. (Read 119776 times)

hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 517
look what DT members are saying about them.
-snip
dude, I have never been a part of DT nor those accounts that you mentioned are part of DT members. I am not sure what made you think that I am part of DT members or why are you claiming that these accounts are part of DT. anyway, these are blatant lies. I suggest removing this claim since none of them are true.

I guess he is confused or do not understand what is mean by DT members. You cant considered as blatant lies, it is just false/incorrect information posted by someone who do not understand about the DT system. Maybe it is an effect of his frustration because he did not get what he is asking for about the loss back.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1104
look what DT members are saying about them.
-snip
dude, I have never been a part of DT nor those accounts that you mentioned are part of DT members. I am not sure what made you think that I am part of DT members or why are you claiming that these accounts are part of DT. anyway, these are blatant lies incorrect information. I suggest removing this claim since none of them are true.

edit: @dustboy you're right.
jr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 1
Happy holloween Duckdice, is this a new promotion exclusively this holloween season? That was some good rake back may I ask where I can find more details or terms and condition about this promotion?
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253


HORROR PARTY - 60% Rakeback + Money Train Promo active!
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 523
Heh. Look Like You Just Completely Ignored My Latest post. Why?

Should I go to your support and ask about what happened at that time?
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253



~27,000 USD free faucet withdrawal on DuckDice by @tommie. Anyone else want to brag about their faucet withdrawal?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 523
Quote

We never promised 10%, we promised UP TO 10%, credited on a monthly basis. This promise is very much fulfilled.

I got you. You can't stop him this way. It's true that you didn't offer a direct 10% loss back. it was up to 10%. Honestly, Both have their explanation. Why I am on the User side?

here is why: I am an old player of DuckDice, Registered 10/16/17. I had a bad experience there. You guys rejected My Doge withdrawal and deducted it from my balance. it was my winnings.
 
My 2 days of playing were ruined. back then I never knew that there is a community named Bitcointalk.

I was frustrated.
I was helpless.
You guys Cheated on me.

Should I raise my problem now what you guys did with me? There is a lot player suffered from you guys. They will be on your side DuckDice.

Never!
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253


HORROR PARTY - 60% Rakeback + Money Train Promo just started!
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
it was calculated at the time, a long time ago, based on deposits + profit - tips and rains etc etc, and accepted, and agreed at the time without dispute at the value of the coins at the time. it's not reasonable in this market too expect loss backs year after the fact on a totally ad hoc bonus without requirements or guarantees. it says 'up too 10%' and i assume from the email message, we calculated it at the time to be exactly that.

it really really is odd this whole request and i would truly hope rational readers will see this for what it is =/



legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
yes exactly, 'up too 10% loss back' which the nomercy was account given after agreement between both parties and now these claims a 1 year+ after this agreement with no further activity on account.
Is it possible to post the convention of the agreement? Few days ago nomercy33 posted a screenshot of DuckDice email support. And it shows that 10% lossback was credited to the user. Was that email sent to him or it was sent to other user? See this reply
@nomercy33, have you received that message to your email (which is connected with ‘NoMercy66’ account).

yeah I have provided all proofs even I have theire support email where they claimed they paid 10% https://prnt.sc/1v9o4kw  while that's only 5%
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
guys do you really think it's reasonable to claim more loss back on top of an already given  bonus of 1 BTC agreed and given over one year ago with no further activity on an offer that had no terms or conditions, no metric to reach, just literally a negotiation you could engage in if you were a high roller?

it doesn't seem very reasonable to me at all =/

the user accepted at the time the deal, we were happy to give it and the matter was closed

all this just feels odd, if it was anything else, like a bonus program with actual metrics too wager for and not given i'd understand, but this whole thing was based on the fact we felt people who lost a lot deserved some ad-hoc custom bonuses and advertised it was possible, and in this case, this happened, and now this user is trying to claim more back than what was initially offered and your all on side? i understand casinos seem like the evil party, but this is taking things too far.

sorry i am trying to be objective in my responses but i am starting to get frustrated, i respect there is communication problems and we're not the best at giving sparkling public responses, can someone please explain to me where it's gone wrong in this? it will help truly

yes i will explain it but cheackout  this screenshot before you read
TOS loseback
https://prnt.sc/1vtb2kv
now when i lost 23 btc they give me in total 1 btc with which i try to recover 23btc,ofc who will take 1 btc when he lose 23?in TOS it written Duckdice.io paying 10% loseback.and read becarefull every single person of the community  is saying you guys are making excuses.

yes exactly, 'up too 10% loss back' which the nomercy was account given after agreement between both parties and now these claims a 1 year+ after this agreement with no further activity on account.

and it's not even terms of service, it was a promotional bit of the page that we have adhered too in good faith.

so please, in making the exact point for us, can we stop it? XD
1st of All this is not a post for fun,where you trying to make its funny.
2nd.i asked that time for loseback from Stan on of your admins,and he paid 1 btc even he was knew it that i lost 23 btc and 2.2 millions dogecoins.Why you changed your TOS  and removed loseback  banner from duckdice.io landing page?

you accepted and agreed to it at the time without any issue, this is now a year on, the banner says 'up too 10% loss back' where we agreed bonuses with high rollers in discussion, as you well know, as well as additional bonuses here and there.

the loss back banner has been removed from the page as we no longer officially support it since the addition of rakeback

i will again state very clearly there was never any condition to meet for this bonus, it was nothing to 'aim' for, no guarantee and no entitlement, it was literally just a means of paying back high rollers a fair chunk when they had a bad run, something duckdice has done many many times for literally hundreds of thousands of dollars including your at the time 10,000 USD or so bonus,

there is no merit or claim you can make in this regard

member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
guys do you really think it's reasonable to claim more loss back on top of an already given  bonus of 1 BTC agreed and given over one year ago with no further activity on an offer that had no terms or conditions, no metric to reach, just literally a negotiation you could engage in if you were a high roller?

it doesn't seem very reasonable to me at all =/

the user accepted at the time the deal, we were happy to give it and the matter was closed

all this just feels odd, if it was anything else, like a bonus program with actual metrics too wager for and not given i'd understand, but this whole thing was based on the fact we felt people who lost a lot deserved some ad-hoc custom bonuses and advertised it was possible, and in this case, this happened, and now this user is trying to claim more back than what was initially offered and your all on side? i understand casinos seem like the evil party, but this is taking things too far.

sorry i am trying to be objective in my responses but i am starting to get frustrated, i respect there is communication problems and we're not the best at giving sparkling public responses, can someone please explain to me where it's gone wrong in this? it will help truly

yes i will explain it but cheackout  this screenshot before you read
TOS loseback
https://prnt.sc/1vtb2kv
now when i lost 23 btc they give me in total 1 btc with which i try to recover 23btc,ofc who will take 1 btc when he lose 23?in TOS it written Duckdice.io paying 10% loseback.and read becarefull every single person of the community  is saying you guys are making excuses.

yes exactly, 'up too 10% loss back' which the nomercy was account given after agreement between both parties and now these claims a 1 year+ after this agreement with no further activity on account.

and it's not even terms of service, it was a promotional bit of the page that we have adhered too in good faith.

so please, in making the exact point for us, can we stop it? XD
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
guys do you really think it's reasonable to claim more loss back on top of an already given  bonus of 1 BTC agreed and given over one year ago with no further activity on an offer that had no terms or conditions, no metric to reach, just literally a negotiation you could engage in if you were a high roller?

it doesn't seem very reasonable to me at all =/

the user accepted at the time the deal, we were happy to give it and the matter was closed

all this just feels odd, if it was anything else, like a bonus program with actual metrics too wager for and not given i'd understand, but this whole thing was based on the fact we felt people who lost a lot deserved some ad-hoc custom bonuses and advertised it was possible, and in this case, this happened, and now this user is trying to claim more back than what was initially offered and your all on side? i understand casinos seem like the evil party, but this is taking things too far.

sorry i am trying to be objective in my responses but i am starting to get frustrated, i respect there is communication problems and we're not the best at giving sparkling public responses, can someone please explain to me where it's gone wrong in this? it will help truly
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1104
You're contradicting yourself.

We would be glad to throw any big bonus for real NoMercy66 to be honest, guy was great and also legit High Roller.
they don't consider the nomercy66 complaining here as the original owner. it would have been nice if they could provide any proof that suggests the nomercy66 complaining here isn't the actual owner. otherwise, I see what they are doing as an excuse to not pay the bonus.
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1208
We never promised 10%, we promised UP TO 10%, credited on a monthly basis. This promise is very much fulfilled.
You're contradicting yourself.

We would be glad to throw any big bonus for real NoMercy66 to be honest, guy was great and also legit High Roller.
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253
Quote

100 bucks seems fare to keep the thread tidy, it is a blackmail though.

And lossback is not really formalised, but we will always try to come up with a bonus for every player. So please send a message to [email protected] with your username.



Like, Seriously? Are you offering a bonus for every player? As far I know, Lossback was For VIP Players only. Why are you offering every player to mail you for bonus instead of paying nomercy? Just because his amount is too big and BTC Breaks its all-time high?

You guys already started losing your reputation in this forum. IDK, if you guys really care about BTCTalk Community feedback.

So, do you thinks that 1+ BTC MoMercy got is a small bonus? The problem with NoMercy is that there is no grounds for a bonus anymore, account is inactive and has no activity.

As he proved that he loss 23 BTC. And You guys Promised a 10% lossback which is 2.3 BTC, not 1 BTC. Don't you think you should keep your promise and pay him the full 10% of lossback? Why he should ask you for it? isn't he valuable enough? You guys should pay him that you guy promised before.

he was inactive - doesn't matter.
why didn't you pay him while he was active?

We never promised 10%, we promised UP TO 10%, credited on a monthly basis. This promise is very much fulfilled.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 523
Quote

100 bucks seems fare to keep the thread tidy, it is a blackmail though.

And lossback is not really formalised, but we will always try to come up with a bonus for every player. So please send a message to [email protected] with your username.



Like, Seriously? Are you offering a bonus for every player? As far I know, Lossback was For VIP Players only. Why are you offering every player to mail you for bonus instead of paying nomercy? Just because his amount is too big and BTC Breaks its all-time high?

You guys already started losing your reputation in this forum. IDK, if you guys really care about BTCTalk Community feedback.

So, do you thinks that 1+ BTC MoMercy got is a small bonus? The problem with NoMercy is that there is no grounds for a bonus anymore, account is inactive and has no activity.

As he proved that he loss 23 BTC. And You guys Promised a 10% lossback which is 2.3 BTC, not 1 BTC. Don't you think you should keep your promise and pay him the full 10% of lossback? Why he should ask you for it? isn't he valuable enough? You guys should pay him that you guy promised before.

he was inactive - doesn't matter.
why didn't you pay him while he was active?
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1208
everyone who has ever played on duckdice should know that we are very good in detecting clones.

This is why the internet sucks sometimes.  I'm a mod on player/mod on duckdice and would like to share some insight on the matter and this certain user :

First of all , I'd like to address the 4500 $ profit this user has that he claims was tipped by a "friend" ,     3 months ago , we've received a complaint in live support from one of our highrollers , that he trusted this certain user with his max level account , to play faucets on it  , cause he came up with a sad story , then  Screwing1100  aka crewchellenge  proceeded in contacting the admins from the High roller's account requesting a lossback bonus ( we we're offering those at the time ) , he received it , tipped his account crewchellenge and withdrew .    Needless to say the Hr player wasn't happy about it
But your system detect Screwing1100 is crewchellenge, but you still paid him. Does that mean you're selective to pay based on the amount demanded and not based on the accusation. You only want to pay the small amount accusation, but the high one 1.3 BTC or $23.400-$ 26.000 (worth at that time) you decline it.


Can please someone logically explain me why should casino pay almost 100,000 USD free bonus to an account that has been inactive for over 1 year?

Notes:
- we paid generous bonus while account was active and user was happy with it
- now account is clearly stolen and we do not talk with an original person
- no current gaming activity whatsoever
If the account eligible to get the loseback and there's no such time limit for the loseback, then he deserve to get his right since he doesn't breaking any rules isn't? The stolen is the crucial part about this case, I've asked before why you not compare the NoMercy66 IP when he's still active and his IP now.
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253
Man (or lady), i don't know who you are, but I am sorry, there is no ethical, logical or legal grounds for bonus here, this is a final decision and it is very well in a scope of our Terms of Use.

If you have so much time just get another account and play a bit and benefit from our bonuses, at the moment we have almost $30,000 faucet win happening you may as well put your effort in doing this.

sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253
This is one of the proofs as a service with GDPR compliance we can not disclose here session data, but IP and fingerprint cross-matching with Crewchellenge and NoMercy - everyone who has ever played on duckdice should know that we are very good in detecting clones. Also, admins were personally in touch with original NoMercy - and simply judging by the level of English and manner of speak (nomercy never demanded bonus, it was just given to him cause we saw his losses) this is NOT the nomecy stirring this show.

DuckDice has a whole system of automated bonuses and if we want to give special treatment to any user whether HR or just an old member - this is done at our sole discretion. Never thought that anyone would ever complain that we give off the book bonuses.

Pages:
Jump to: