Pages:
Author

Topic: ✅ DuckDice.io 🎲 Rakeback 🎲 Races 🎲 Faucet 🎲 Deposit Bonus 🎲 Jackpot 🎲 - page 23. (Read 120079 times)

sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253


HORROR PARTY - 60% Rakeback + Money Train Promo still running!

Hop in!
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253
New users do usually get confused what's DT or whatever but let's go back to the topic. I think I've seen this before about nomercy but until now I think it's still not resolved. Does duckdice do anything about it or maybe you could come up with some terms or agreement? so this issue will be done.

What do you think the resolution should look like? (no sarcasm or anything)
full member
Activity: 648
Merit: 114
New users do usually get confused what's DT or whatever but let's go back to the topic. I think I've seen this before about nomercy but until now I think it's still not resolved. Does duckdice do anything about it or maybe you could come up with some terms or agreement? so this issue will be done.
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 808
you are trying to say that you didnt post that comment?buddy you know really well that duckdice.io isn't  a good place as you can see on the screenshot i have posted its your word's.Be Honest atleast
are you serious? I don't know what made you go to that conclusion. did see me ever claim in my previous post that I didn't post what you showed on your screenshot? if you read my previous post, I said that I have never been a part of DT member(and probably will never be) or the other members that you showed on that screenshot.

Dude, You are misunderstand what he is trying to express on his statement. He didn't care anymore about the DT matters but rather your statement about duck dice for being a shady casino based on the Screenshot of your previous post here https://i.imgur.com/puqqqq6.jpeg

He just want you to make a stand on your statement about duckdice regardless if you are DT or not. He already revised his previous post and admit the incorrect use of DT. It's not a big deal and you are on both side. You should stop right now this argument.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1119
you are trying to say that you didnt post that comment?buddy you know really well that duckdice.io isn't  a good place as you can see on the screenshot i have posted its your word's.Be Honest atleast
are you serious? I don't know what made you go to that conclusion. did see me ever claim in my previous post that I didn't post what you showed on your screenshot? if you read my previous post, I said that I have never been a part of DT member(and probably will never be) or the other members that you showed on that screenshot.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 517
look what DT members are saying about them.
-snip
dude, I have never been a part of DT nor those accounts that you mentioned are part of DT members. I am not sure what made you think that I am part of DT members or why are you claiming that these accounts are part of DT. anyway, these are blatant lies. I suggest removing this claim since none of them are true.

I guess he is confused or do not understand what is mean by DT members. You cant considered as blatant lies, it is just false/incorrect information posted by someone who do not understand about the DT system. Maybe it is an effect of his frustration because he did not get what he is asking for about the loss back.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1119
look what DT members are saying about them.
-snip
dude, I have never been a part of DT nor those accounts that you mentioned are part of DT members. I am not sure what made you think that I am part of DT members or why are you claiming that these accounts are part of DT. anyway, these are blatant lies incorrect information. I suggest removing this claim since none of them are true.

edit: @dustboy you're right.
jr. member
Activity: 307
Merit: 1
Happy holloween Duckdice, is this a new promotion exclusively this holloween season? That was some good rake back may I ask where I can find more details or terms and condition about this promotion?
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253


HORROR PARTY - 60% Rakeback + Money Train Promo active!
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 523
Heh. Look Like You Just Completely Ignored My Latest post. Why?

Should I go to your support and ask about what happened at that time?
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253



~27,000 USD free faucet withdrawal on DuckDice by @tommie. Anyone else want to brag about their faucet withdrawal?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 523
Quote

We never promised 10%, we promised UP TO 10%, credited on a monthly basis. This promise is very much fulfilled.

I got you. You can't stop him this way. It's true that you didn't offer a direct 10% loss back. it was up to 10%. Honestly, Both have their explanation. Why I am on the User side?

here is why: I am an old player of DuckDice, Registered 10/16/17. I had a bad experience there. You guys rejected My Doge withdrawal and deducted it from my balance. it was my winnings.
 
My 2 days of playing were ruined. back then I never knew that there is a community named Bitcointalk.

I was frustrated.
I was helpless.
You guys Cheated on me.

Should I raise my problem now what you guys did with me? There is a lot player suffered from you guys. They will be on your side DuckDice.

Never!
sr. member
Activity: 1340
Merit: 253


HORROR PARTY - 60% Rakeback + Money Train Promo just started!
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
it was calculated at the time, a long time ago, based on deposits + profit - tips and rains etc etc, and accepted, and agreed at the time without dispute at the value of the coins at the time. it's not reasonable in this market too expect loss backs year after the fact on a totally ad hoc bonus without requirements or guarantees. it says 'up too 10%' and i assume from the email message, we calculated it at the time to be exactly that.

it really really is odd this whole request and i would truly hope rational readers will see this for what it is =/



legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1026
In Search of Incredible
yes exactly, 'up too 10% loss back' which the nomercy was account given after agreement between both parties and now these claims a 1 year+ after this agreement with no further activity on account.
Is it possible to post the convention of the agreement? Few days ago nomercy33 posted a screenshot of DuckDice email support. And it shows that 10% lossback was credited to the user. Was that email sent to him or it was sent to other user? See this reply
@nomercy33, have you received that message to your email (which is connected with ‘NoMercy66’ account).

yeah I have provided all proofs even I have theire support email where they claimed they paid 10% https://prnt.sc/1v9o4kw  while that's only 5%
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
guys do you really think it's reasonable to claim more loss back on top of an already given  bonus of 1 BTC agreed and given over one year ago with no further activity on an offer that had no terms or conditions, no metric to reach, just literally a negotiation you could engage in if you were a high roller?

it doesn't seem very reasonable to me at all =/

the user accepted at the time the deal, we were happy to give it and the matter was closed

all this just feels odd, if it was anything else, like a bonus program with actual metrics too wager for and not given i'd understand, but this whole thing was based on the fact we felt people who lost a lot deserved some ad-hoc custom bonuses and advertised it was possible, and in this case, this happened, and now this user is trying to claim more back than what was initially offered and your all on side? i understand casinos seem like the evil party, but this is taking things too far.

sorry i am trying to be objective in my responses but i am starting to get frustrated, i respect there is communication problems and we're not the best at giving sparkling public responses, can someone please explain to me where it's gone wrong in this? it will help truly

yes i will explain it but cheackout  this screenshot before you read
TOS loseback
https://prnt.sc/1vtb2kv
now when i lost 23 btc they give me in total 1 btc with which i try to recover 23btc,ofc who will take 1 btc when he lose 23?in TOS it written Duckdice.io paying 10% loseback.and read becarefull every single person of the community  is saying you guys are making excuses.

yes exactly, 'up too 10% loss back' which the nomercy was account given after agreement between both parties and now these claims a 1 year+ after this agreement with no further activity on account.

and it's not even terms of service, it was a promotional bit of the page that we have adhered too in good faith.

so please, in making the exact point for us, can we stop it? XD
1st of All this is not a post for fun,where you trying to make its funny.
2nd.i asked that time for loseback from Stan on of your admins,and he paid 1 btc even he was knew it that i lost 23 btc and 2.2 millions dogecoins.Why you changed your TOS  and removed loseback  banner from duckdice.io landing page?

you accepted and agreed to it at the time without any issue, this is now a year on, the banner says 'up too 10% loss back' where we agreed bonuses with high rollers in discussion, as you well know, as well as additional bonuses here and there.

the loss back banner has been removed from the page as we no longer officially support it since the addition of rakeback

i will again state very clearly there was never any condition to meet for this bonus, it was nothing to 'aim' for, no guarantee and no entitlement, it was literally just a means of paying back high rollers a fair chunk when they had a bad run, something duckdice has done many many times for literally hundreds of thousands of dollars including your at the time 10,000 USD or so bonus,

there is no merit or claim you can make in this regard

member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
guys do you really think it's reasonable to claim more loss back on top of an already given  bonus of 1 BTC agreed and given over one year ago with no further activity on an offer that had no terms or conditions, no metric to reach, just literally a negotiation you could engage in if you were a high roller?

it doesn't seem very reasonable to me at all =/

the user accepted at the time the deal, we were happy to give it and the matter was closed

all this just feels odd, if it was anything else, like a bonus program with actual metrics too wager for and not given i'd understand, but this whole thing was based on the fact we felt people who lost a lot deserved some ad-hoc custom bonuses and advertised it was possible, and in this case, this happened, and now this user is trying to claim more back than what was initially offered and your all on side? i understand casinos seem like the evil party, but this is taking things too far.

sorry i am trying to be objective in my responses but i am starting to get frustrated, i respect there is communication problems and we're not the best at giving sparkling public responses, can someone please explain to me where it's gone wrong in this? it will help truly

yes i will explain it but cheackout  this screenshot before you read
TOS loseback
https://prnt.sc/1vtb2kv
now when i lost 23 btc they give me in total 1 btc with which i try to recover 23btc,ofc who will take 1 btc when he lose 23?in TOS it written Duckdice.io paying 10% loseback.and read becarefull every single person of the community  is saying you guys are making excuses.

yes exactly, 'up too 10% loss back' which the nomercy was account given after agreement between both parties and now these claims a 1 year+ after this agreement with no further activity on account.

and it's not even terms of service, it was a promotional bit of the page that we have adhered too in good faith.

so please, in making the exact point for us, can we stop it? XD
member
Activity: 128
Merit: 14
guys do you really think it's reasonable to claim more loss back on top of an already given  bonus of 1 BTC agreed and given over one year ago with no further activity on an offer that had no terms or conditions, no metric to reach, just literally a negotiation you could engage in if you were a high roller?

it doesn't seem very reasonable to me at all =/

the user accepted at the time the deal, we were happy to give it and the matter was closed

all this just feels odd, if it was anything else, like a bonus program with actual metrics too wager for and not given i'd understand, but this whole thing was based on the fact we felt people who lost a lot deserved some ad-hoc custom bonuses and advertised it was possible, and in this case, this happened, and now this user is trying to claim more back than what was initially offered and your all on side? i understand casinos seem like the evil party, but this is taking things too far.

sorry i am trying to be objective in my responses but i am starting to get frustrated, i respect there is communication problems and we're not the best at giving sparkling public responses, can someone please explain to me where it's gone wrong in this? it will help truly
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1119
You're contradicting yourself.

We would be glad to throw any big bonus for real NoMercy66 to be honest, guy was great and also legit High Roller.
they don't consider the nomercy66 complaining here as the original owner. it would have been nice if they could provide any proof that suggests the nomercy66 complaining here isn't the actual owner. otherwise, I see what they are doing as an excuse to not pay the bonus.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1209
We never promised 10%, we promised UP TO 10%, credited on a monthly basis. This promise is very much fulfilled.
You're contradicting yourself.

We would be glad to throw any big bonus for real NoMercy66 to be honest, guy was great and also legit High Roller.
Pages:
Jump to: