Yes, into fourth year now
Bold doesn't make a message any more or less valid mate, but as you asked:
Network one of the most secure.
Earning info here
Progress ongoing:
https://www.cryptsy.com/
https://vircurex.com/
https://crypto-trade.com/
https://bter.com/
https://mcxnow.com/
Could do better? Of course, but this one's for the long run. It's about human work so it's what people make of it.
Topic: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated - page 153. (Read 1058949 times)
Devcoin still alive?
Devcoin still alive? What are the exchanges which transact Devcoin? There are still many users by mining? How is the interest of people for coin?
I really hope it stays alive. I think Devcoin has enormous potential compared to other coins. Devcoin still alive? What are the exchanges which transact Devcoin? There are still many users by mining? How is the interest of people for coin?
Devcoin still alive?
Devcoin still alive? What are the exchanges which transact Devcoin? There are still many users by mining? How is the interest of people for coin?
Devcoin still alive? What are the exchanges which transact Devcoin? There are still many users by mining? How is the interest of people for coin?
Yes, I agree with you guys. It was just a thought experiment.
It is possible that devcoin reaches a high pricelevel without big trading volume (no more dumping, many people holding the coin longterm)
and it's also possible that devcoin has a low pricelevel with large trading volume. (everybody basically just trying to get rid of the "hot potato" nobody wants)
And all other combinations are also possible:
higher pricelevel + big volume. (mania, devcoin recognized as big player.)
lower pricelevel + low volume (worst case, no activity, except us
... basically what we have now.)
It is possible that devcoin reaches a high pricelevel without big trading volume (no more dumping, many people holding the coin longterm)
and it's also possible that devcoin has a low pricelevel with large trading volume. (everybody basically just trying to get rid of the "hot potato" nobody wants)
And all other combinations are also possible:
higher pricelevel + big volume. (mania, devcoin recognized as big player.)
lower pricelevel + low volume (worst case, no activity, except us
... basically what we have now.) Is it still true that we have about 7.2 million new devcoin being created every day? This will never change since devcoin doesn't have blockhalving etc, right?
So to keep the price at 10 satoshi we need a buying power of 0.72 BTC every day to compensate for the selling pressure.
This also means that to keep the price at 100 satoshi we would need 7.2 BTC, etc...
So to keep the price at 10 satoshi we need a buying power of 0.72 BTC every day to compensate for the selling pressure.
This also means that to keep the price at 100 satoshi we would need 7.2 BTC, etc...
In general yes... I always think in worsed case too... so we need atleast 1 btc buying everyday. However with new services we implement we may increase buying power exponentialyl as speculators start to come in when we have actual business/services providing a valuable community service as well as providing income.
Not really because that assumes every new Devcoin generated is immediately sold at market, whatever the price. Like all exchange it comes down to the value placed on the effort to acquire a tradable thing vs. that of something else. As 90% of Devcoins are earned through non-hashing it then becomes about the implied value of the service performed or goods produced to acquire them and perceptions of longer term value. Volume and velocity obviously help though.
Is it still true that we have about 7.2 million new devcoin being created every day? This will never change since devcoin doesn't have blockhalving etc, right?
So to keep the price at 10 satoshi we need a buying power of 0.72 BTC every day to compensate for the selling pressure.
This also means that to keep the price at 100 satoshi we would need 7.2 BTC, etc...
So to keep the price at 10 satoshi we need a buying power of 0.72 BTC every day to compensate for the selling pressure.
This also means that to keep the price at 100 satoshi we would need 7.2 BTC, etc...
Me too. Hunterbunter runs blisterpool.com. Yeah people seem to have worked out that greed trumps sensibilities, so if it's cheaper for A to mine than for B it tends towards centralisation and implied trust - unless they do something about it. Genius.
In the meantime why not go to mintpal and vote for Devcoin to be added.
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Place 23, we need 2x the votes we have now.... will take some time.
Yeah, we're competing with bots so bit of a challenge.https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Place 23, we need 2x the votes we have now.... will take some time.
could be, could be. I just voted again.
In the meantime why not buy a little DVC... if only the pool I mine BTC would be a little bit luckier, I would buy a million DVC every day..... but the pool hasn't found a block in 24 hours: https://bitminter.com/blocks
What's up with a lot of pools lately? They talk about "blockwithholding" attacks that cause a lot of problems?
In the meantime why not go to mintpal and vote for Devcoin to be added.
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Place 23, we need 2x the votes we have now.... will take some time.
Yeah, we're competing with bots so bit of a challenge. https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Place 23, we need 2x the votes we have now.... will take some time.
In the meantime why not go to mintpal and vote for Devcoin to be added.
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Place 23, we need 2x the votes we have now.... will take some time.
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
Place 23, we need 2x the votes we have now.... will take some time.
You're entitled to that opinion (because that's what it is), but why on earth would you care about it so much that you would bad-mouth it without context? What do you get out of it not doing well? How does it affect you?
U mean why devcoin is worthless? Is that not obvious despite hero member status? Ouch my dear. Sorry
No, I mean what I asked, which you obviously avoided: how does it affect you?
Its weird cause the other menu's are still being served from the CDN unless it had to go to the server to fetch.. then it should have hit varnish cache... but once you been to the menu once it will cache it on your browser so it will be quick to click on the same menu again.
If your logged in there is no caching since cookies are stored for authentication.
If your logged in there is no caching since cookies are stored for authentication.
I run a ubuntu server too, but not yet with SSD.
Would you say that it's worth it to change to SSD?
Internetspeed is so much dependend on other things too... not just the harddisk type...
Yes the ones hosted at 21stcenturymoneytalk. It also hosts some primecoin and other links, so assumed it was either owned by fuzzybear or twobits (could be wrong) but haven't heard back from a msg yet.
And don't bother feeding trolls - it's a waste of time and he's doing that on just about every thread.
And don't bother feeding trolls - it's a waste of time and he's doing that on just about every thread.
Can some one please verify that the link for the windows wallet at devcoin.org is working or not working? I have tested on 2 pc's and going to '21st century money talk' with no wallet download. I have not checked other wallet links as I'm travelling right now, but it appears that the windows wallet link is not going to the download.
This guy reminds me of those freak trolls chasing around finshaggy remember that dude. Oh dear not another one of those.. they r annoying little creatures 
Oh well..
Oh well.. 
I am sorry that devcoin is gone too. i didnt have anything against it, u see?
The condemned live longer.
There's life in the old dog yet.
Just wait.
I would be positively surprised if it makes a come back. good luck!
peace
You're entitled to that opinion (because that's what it is), but why on earth would you care about it so much that you would bad-mouth it without context? What do you get out of it not doing well? How does it affect you?
U mean why devcoin is worthless? Is that not obvious despite hero member status? Ouch my dear. Sorry
I am sorry that devcoin is gone too. i didnt have anything against it, u see?
The condemned live longer.
There's life in the old dog yet.
Just wait.
I would be positively surprised if it makes a come back. good luck!
peace
You're entitled to that opinion (because that's what it is), but why on earth would you care about it so much that you would bad-mouth it without context? What do you get out of it not doing well? How does it affect you?
Its weird cause the other menu's are still being served from the CDN unless it had to go to the server to fetch.. then it should have hit varnish cache... but once you been to the menu once it will cache it on your browser so it will be quick to click on the same menu again.
If your logged in there is no caching since cookies are stored for authentication.
If your logged in there is no caching since cookies are stored for authentication.
I run a ubuntu server too, but not yet with SSD.
Would you say that it's worth it to change to SSD?
Internetspeed is so much dependend on other things too... not just the harddisk type...
Sure thats why I used all of those other cache's and optimizations I told you... but SSD helps.. Varnish is storing its cache on a 1gb cache file while object cache and page cache is done using memcacheD.... so varnish allows for a bigger cache but uses SSD to do its thing.. but seems as though its not much slower than using memory...
In the end SSD prices compete with VPS im paying $5 per month better than my blue host price which was slow... DNS was taking 2 seconds to resolve.. screw that. Cloudflare DNS is the best.
Its weird cause the other menu's are still being served from the CDN unless it had to go to the server to fetch.. then it should have hit varnish cache... but once you been to the menu once it will cache it on your browser so it will be quick to click on the same menu again.
If your logged in there is no caching since cookies are stored for authentication.
If your logged in there is no caching since cookies are stored for authentication.
I run a ubuntu server too, but not yet with SSD.
Would you say that it's worth it to change to SSD?
Internetspeed is so much dependend on other things too... not just the harddisk type...
Jump to: