Author

Topic: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated - page 185. (Read 1059181 times)

legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1007
February 12, 2014, 02:35:05 PM

You're lucky, none of mine got in this round. There is a week long process and each new writer needs to be checked by 3 different people AFTER you post your first 1000 words.

I singed up for devtome few weeks ago but didn't post anything just wrote my articles in word instead of the wiki thinking that I was ok if I post them by the deadline. Didn't know about the 1000 words rule.

Basically, everything that doesn't get in round 32 will transfer into round 33.

With the influx of new writers the process is going very slow, I have yet to be contacted about my devcoin address by an admin and it's over a week now since I started posting on devtome. Nothing to do but wait for the next round I guess.


On a similar note as my last post, since the suggestion for dedicated help position was rejected, how about we add more admins and/or devtome reviewers? The devtome word count doubled last round and is likely to double again this round with the high dvc price.

Thoughts?

The issue isn't with a lack of admins. I'm not your writing admin so I can't confirm, but maybe you were flagged for something. If you want to toss me a PM with more information I'll forward it up and see what happened.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1029
February 12, 2014, 12:02:15 PM
50 - from round 31: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?&topic=233997.msg4053035#msg4053035
You didn't know? I even quoted your previously discussed article. It doesn't make much practical difference anyway because it was an effort (mostly by me to be honest) to at least keep payments in line with 80 when bounded multipliers were incorporated. So it means good writers can still get max 75 (50 * 1.5), other writers less.

LOL weisoq--I totally missed the post. Lucky for me I had no objections Smiley

I was reading some of the more recent posts about support or the lack thereof, and here's my take on it:

1. People are generally willing to help, even if it's not exactly something they get paid to do, so team spirit is high. Exceptions seem to be few and far between and probably can be dealt with case by case.

2. Some of us (yes, yours truly included) don't always keep up with the forum so might miss support requests we can answer. Even when we do, it's easy if we're in a hurry to hope someone else answers the question first (and often that does happen). So it's possible this thread may not be the best place to post these requests.

3. For me PM's are a sure way to reach me, because even if I'm not on the Forum for a few days, I get the notification in my email. Then when I want to address them, I log onto the Forum and all my support requests (mostly signup requests) are in one place, not mixed in with my other emails. So if I'm the person to ask, then PM is the best way.

4. Having said that, PM is not the best way to get immediate support from me as I may not get back to the request for a day or two, so I generally encourage users to post their questions to the thread saying someone else might get to it sooner than I will, but I make an effort to still answer their question as soon as I can.

5. Even though we're all a team and there's a lot of cross help, it would be helpful to have something like an About Us page on the Devtome that is prominently linked to from the front page. This page would have a headline section for each admin and what each one does and his or her preferred contact method. For example for me, it's via forum PM, but for others it might be a specific email address, social media ID or text message, etc.)

6. We also have a prominently linked Devtome page that is organized by the various support needs users might have, and each section includes options on how to go about getting that support. In some cases it may be reaching out on this thread, but other cases may involve PM'ing a specific admin, or even sending a PM to a specific group of admins.

7. We also have a prominently linked Devtome page for updates/announcements/changes. Admins can make a point to check it regularly so they know when changes happen (if like me they missed it when it was announced here). When a change is posted on the announcement page, it should also be populated on any other policy pages so that all info is consistent. So for example, any pages which mention a writer share count limit of 80 should be changed to 50.

If there are no objections I'll go ahead and create an about us page and ask admins to post their own info once I have a good format down. At first admins will be listed in no particular order, but as more info is added I'll organize it into some logical fashion, grouping like admins together.

If there are no objections I'll create a page for common support issues and how to resolve them, again with the commitment to organize it in a logical manner once info gets added. I would ask admins who mostly deal with a certain type of issue to fill in the info about the issue and how to resolve it. This page could read like an FAQ page.

If there are no objections I'll create an update/announcement page, and this one will simply be maintained where new announcements get added to the top (like a blog).

I won't invoice any of these pages since most of the content will not be created by me, just organized.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 12, 2014, 11:37:15 AM
Umm, hey guys I got a possible noob question concerning Devtome. I'm asking here because the Devtome thread seems to be dead.

So here's my profile:
http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:kochmann799

All the articles apart from the one called "How having little confidence affects a relationship" were written and submitted to the front page before the submission deadline of Round 32. When I checked the stats it seems only the four above the subsection were counted in by tomecount as the word count from the stats matches the total I did on wordcounter.net

So my question is. Did I screw up by making a subsection? Will my articles still get counted in this round if I line them up differently?

Thanks!




You're lucky, none of mine got in this round. There is a week long process and each new writer needs to be checked by 3 different people AFTER you post your first 1000 words.

I singed up for devtome few weeks ago but didn't post anything just wrote my articles in word instead of the wiki thinking that I was ok if I post them by the deadline. Didn't know about the 1000 words rule.

Basically, everything that doesn't get in round 32 will transfer into round 33.

With the influx of new writers the process is going very slow, I have yet to be contacted about my devcoin address by an admin and it's over a week now since I started posting on devtome. Nothing to do but wait for the next round I guess.


Well, I got contacted and added to the list and everything. I started posting like in the middle of the round. But I want to make sure it's not a layout glitch that is making tomecount ignore those entries.
full member
Activity: 166
Merit: 100
February 12, 2014, 11:26:09 AM

You're lucky, none of mine got in this round. There is a week long process and each new writer needs to be checked by 3 different people AFTER you post your first 1000 words.

I singed up for devtome few weeks ago but didn't post anything just wrote my articles in word instead of the wiki thinking that I was ok if I post them by the deadline. Didn't know about the 1000 words rule.

Basically, everything that doesn't get in round 32 will transfer into round 33.

With the influx of new writers the process is going very slow, I have yet to be contacted about my devcoin address by an admin and it's over a week now since I started posting on devtome. Nothing to do but wait for the next round I guess.


On a similar note as my last post, since the suggestion for dedicated help position was rejected, how about we add more admins and/or devtome reviewers? The devtome word count doubled last round and is likely to double again this round with the high dvc price.

Thoughts?
full member
Activity: 166
Merit: 100
February 12, 2014, 11:21:52 AM
Umm, hey guys I got a possible noob question concerning Devtome. I'm asking here because the Devtome thread seems to be dead.

So here's my profile:
http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:kochmann799

All the articles apart from the one called "How having little confidence affects a relationship" were written and submitted to the front page before the submission deadline of Round 32. When I checked the stats it seems only the four above the subsection were counted in by tomecount as the word count from the stats matches the total I did on wordcounter.net

So my question is. Did I screw up by making a subsection? Will my articles still get counted in this round if I line them up differently?

Thanks!




You're lucky, none of mine got in this round. There is a week long process and each new writer needs to be checked by 3 different people AFTER you post your first 1000 words.

I singed up for devtome few weeks ago but didn't post anything just wrote my articles in word instead of the wiki thinking that I was ok if I post them by the deadline. Didn't know about the 1000 words rule.

Basically, everything that doesn't get in round 32 will transfer into round 33.

With the influx of new writers the process is going very slow, I have yet to be contacted about my devcoin address by an admin and it's over a week now since I started posting on devtome. Nothing to do but wait for the next round I guess.
legendary
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1005
February 12, 2014, 11:01:42 AM
I meant broad sense of rescan if wallet rescan didnt work including blockchain refresh or pvt key importing.

Most devcoin users are techies and not dumb enough to cry the sky is falling..

That said I understand the importance and I think it should be merged in but the right place for it would be we merge in 0.9 unless you can provide a more compelling why it cant wait fir 0.8.5 to be even finalized.

The sky is falling!!!
heh didnt you get them back?

Yep!

BTW I'll update the bounty sheet with your bounty once I get home.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
February 12, 2014, 10:43:46 AM
Umm, hey guys I got a possible noob question concerning Devtome. I'm asking here because the Devtome thread seems to be dead.

So here's my profile:
http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=wiki:user:kochmann799

All the articles apart from the one called "How having little confidence affects a relationship" were written and submitted to the front page before the submission deadline of Round 32. When I checked the stats it seems only the four above the subsection were counted in by tomecount as the word count from the stats matches the total I did on wordcounter.net

So my question is. Did I screw up by making a subsection? Will my articles still get counted in this round if I line them up differently?

Thanks!


hero member
Activity: 585
Merit: 501
February 12, 2014, 10:39:08 AM
Hello,

We have officially started accepting DevCoin as a payment method on our website - http://www.SaltsWorldWide.com/  !

All orders that are paid for in DevCoin receive an additional discount automatically!

Check us out today!  We have free shipping in the US and low cost international shipping!


Awesome! Salt for ECA: http://www.ecawater.com/doc/b/ECA%20INFO%20B2%20The%20Past%20Present%20&%20Future%20of%20the%20technology.pdf

ECA is still avalable for DVC Smiley

thank you IRINFO
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
February 12, 2014, 10:11:30 AM
Hello,

We have officially started accepting DevCoin as a payment method on our website - http://www.SaltsWorldWide.com/  !

All orders that are paid for in DevCoin receive an additional discount automatically!

Check us out today!  We have free shipping in the US and low cost international shipping!
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
February 12, 2014, 07:16:01 AM
The round 32 receiver files have been uploaded to: [...]

There were 1587 original receiver lines, so the average number of devcoins per share is 180,000,000 dvc / 1587 = 113,422 dvc. Administrator pay is 218.0 shares, 13.7 percent of the total. The value at vircurex is 0.9 mcbtc/dvc, which works out to 0.102 btc. This times the bitstamp price of 662$ gives a share price of 68$.

http://dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com/ shows 119,442 dvc/share (with 1508 shares) for round 32. Is this a bug in the DVC countdown? Or a miscalculation somewhere?

dvccountdown read my d.evco.in/charity log, which read github/Unthinkingbit/charity, so it mean Unthinkingbit has not already update github record to the newest version, so this cause the inconsistance.


Yep this is correct, you can check that by looking at Unthinkingbit's master at: https://github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/tree/master

The updates will go through fairly quickly once UTB puts the official versions up on the git.
legendary
Activity: 1420
Merit: 1010
February 12, 2014, 04:57:59 AM
Just to let all ASCMDVCPT holders https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5096800

It looks like I may be able to buy 5 shares myself and take over the listing completely and issue out past dividends etc.  I will be funding this out of my own pocket.

Fuzzybear
full member
Activity: 276
Merit: 102
February 12, 2014, 04:53:13 AM
The round 32 receiver files have been uploaded to: [...]

There were 1587 original receiver lines, so the average number of devcoins per share is 180,000,000 dvc / 1587 = 113,422 dvc. Administrator pay is 218.0 shares, 13.7 percent of the total. The value at vircurex is 0.9 mcbtc/dvc, which works out to 0.102 btc. This times the bitstamp price of 662$ gives a share price of 68$.

http://dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com/ shows 119,442 dvc/share (with 1508 shares) for round 32. Is this a bug in the DVC countdown? Or a miscalculation somewhere?

dvccountdown read my d.evco.in/charity log, which read github/Unthinkingbit/charity, so it mean Unthinkingbit has not already update github record to the newest version, so this cause the inconsistance.
member
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
February 12, 2014, 04:40:55 AM
The round 32 receiver files have been uploaded to: [...]

There were 1587 original receiver lines, so the average number of devcoins per share is 180,000,000 dvc / 1587 = 113,422 dvc. Administrator pay is 218.0 shares, 13.7 percent of the total. The value at vircurex is 0.9 mcbtc/dvc, which works out to 0.102 btc. This times the bitstamp price of 662$ gives a share price of 68$.

http://dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com/ shows 119,442 dvc/share (with 1508 shares) for round 32. Is this a bug in the DVC countdown? Or a miscalculation somewhere?
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
February 12, 2014, 01:42:51 AM

It's really not needed. General questions are easy enough to answer. The technical questions go to K1773R and Emfox. In fact, this is what they're being paid to do as part of their jobs on a round-by-round basis.

Busted.

Yea I dont really see them contributing to people asking questions, especially ont he forum, who really has the time to look up a user to send a private message when it is way easier to simply post on a thread?

I haven't seen either of them answer questions, its usually one of us answering people.

It's really serious accusation, and let me clarify it.

My admin job is Linux wallet maintainance and help people install on their own linux box. since it's now we actively developing and testing new wallet (and I think I do did something during this phase), I haven't starting packaging an new official one( and have done an testing one, but now no one tested or give me feedbacks).

concerning helping people compiling or installed devcoin wallet in their linux box, there is not much questions there(this forum thread) , and I've answered all those who have posted or directly send pms to me (maybe Hunterbunter can prove it that he has contacted me about devcoind compiling, or installation I don't remember well).

So, I am working as an admin.


Edit: Yes, I confirmed it's Hunterbunter who've contacted me, and also recently question I've answered in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4355754 . too long this thread is, I woundn't like to dig the whole thread again to find more.

ive asked repeatedly for someone to build me a linux build and I didnt get anything from you in an answer.. But maybe thats my fault i should have pmed you instead.. I didnt mean to sound harsh just seemed like Im left to try to find the right people to do the right things.. we need more coordination to roll out products and the source is our new product. Tomorrow we have another release happens I expect it to go smoother everytime.. we all are on one team and we should try to help whenever we can. Im not sure but I thought admins should be answering questions on the thread too? Do people expect to be redirected everytime to the right admin?

Im still not sure whos in charge of what until I reread the csv file but he better we work together the better it will reflect in the community and as a result our future here in crypto.

Your a wallet admin right? Ive seem many posts general ones about the wallet regarding missing coins or  checking balanced on the blockchain.. as a wallet admin regardless of os isnt that something you should know? If noone else knows the internals of a wallet then who will help them?

ok, I admit sometimes I may be missing some questions not linux concerned, it should be my fault if I know the answer but not answering it.

Talking to the wallet maintaince. I think I have expressed my meaning and plan of linux version, let me say it in detail again here:
1. people using devcoind more often than devcoin-qt (gui version, I mean) in linux environment
2. those who using devcoind is mostly would like to build devcoind themself rather than using pre-built binarys, so it not urgent to redistribute binary version for linux
3. I haven't find suitable and graceful way of building linux version of devcoin-qt, and concerning both the static and dynamic link method, though I've built an ugly one, but no one seems have test it.
4. the current makefile manual hack cause some issue (like you should wipe */.deps first before doing linux build), and I'd like to use automake/autoconf building system that bitcoin 0.8.6 already use, which is beatiful and os independent, but I heard you'd like to wait till 0.8.5 of devcoin became stable and matual before we move forward, so I'm still thinking I should wait or port it myself first ...

and last, a little busy myself recently, so I haven't rebuild any new version of linux wallet.  but I do actively testing the wallet, I've used 1.0.7 1.0.9 1.0.13 1.0.14 1.0.15, and redistributed some version (1.0.13 or .9?) to my friend, encourage them to use and testing our shinning new wallet. some of them lost 250,000 devcoins due to the fee issue, I just covered this myself because I realised it's a kind of support to devcoin development while the one who lost his coins didn't think so.

Edit: I found the reply I post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4613062 , that was exactly me and only built the linux test version.


Ok thanks for the good work.. I think the makefile for linux in the repository should be building so I would need the file so I can update the source. Maybe HunterBunter can supply this file since he compiled thr daemon fine.

We should give a distributable for all OS its what others do. Hopefully we are close to having our first merged block so we can move on.. If you would like please see if you can get the cross platform building working and I can try to help but if you know what to do with it your already ahead of me.

full member
Activity: 276
Merit: 102
February 12, 2014, 01:01:41 AM

It's really not needed. General questions are easy enough to answer. The technical questions go to K1773R and Emfox. In fact, this is what they're being paid to do as part of their jobs on a round-by-round basis.

Busted.

Yea I dont really see them contributing to people asking questions, especially ont he forum, who really has the time to look up a user to send a private message when it is way easier to simply post on a thread?

I haven't seen either of them answer questions, its usually one of us answering people.

It's really serious accusation, and let me clarify it.

My admin job is Linux wallet maintainance and help people install on their own linux box. since it's now we actively developing and testing new wallet (and I think I do did something during this phase), I haven't starting packaging an new official one( and have done an testing one, but now no one tested or give me feedbacks).

concerning helping people compiling or installed devcoin wallet in their linux box, there is not much questions there(this forum thread) , and I've answered all those who have posted or directly send pms to me (maybe Hunterbunter can prove it that he has contacted me about devcoind compiling, or installation I don't remember well).

So, I am working as an admin.


Edit: Yes, I confirmed it's Hunterbunter who've contacted me, and also recently question I've answered in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4355754 . too long this thread is, I woundn't like to dig the whole thread again to find more.

ive asked repeatedly for someone to build me a linux build and I didnt get anything from you in an answer.. But maybe thats my fault i should have pmed you instead.. I didnt mean to sound harsh just seemed like Im left to try to find the right people to do the right things.. we need more coordination to roll out products and the source is our new product. Tomorrow we have another release happens I expect it to go smoother everytime.. we all are on one team and we should try to help whenever we can. Im not sure but I thought admins should be answering questions on the thread too? Do people expect to be redirected everytime to the right admin?

Im still not sure whos in charge of what until I reread the csv file but he better we work together the better it will reflect in the community and as a result our future here in crypto.

Your a wallet admin right? Ive seem many posts general ones about the wallet regarding missing coins or  checking balanced on the blockchain.. as a wallet admin regardless of os isnt that something you should know? If noone else knows the internals of a wallet then who will help them?

ok, I admit sometimes I may be missing some questions not linux concerned, it should be my fault if I know the answer but not answering it.

Talking to the wallet maintaince. I think I have expressed my meaning and plan of linux version, let me say it in detail again here:
1. people using devcoind more often than devcoin-qt (gui version, I mean) in linux environment
2. those who using devcoind is mostly would like to build devcoind themself rather than using pre-built binarys, so it not urgent to redistribute binary version for linux
3. I haven't find suitable and graceful way of building linux version of devcoin-qt, and concerning both the static and dynamic link method, though I've built an ugly one, but no one seems have test it.
4. the current makefile manual hack cause some issue (like you should wipe */.deps first before doing linux build), and I'd like to use automake/autoconf building system that bitcoin 0.8.6 already use, which is beatiful and os independent, but I heard you'd like to wait till 0.8.5 of devcoin became stable and matual before we move forward, so I'm still thinking I should wait or port it myself first ...

and last, a little busy myself recently, so I haven't rebuild any new version of linux wallet.  but I do actively testing the wallet, I've used 1.0.7 1.0.9 1.0.13 1.0.14 1.0.15, and redistributed some version (1.0.13 or .9?) to my friend, encourage them to use and testing our shinning new wallet. some of them lost 250,000 devcoins due to the fee issue, I just covered this myself because I realised it's a kind of support to devcoin development while the one who lost his coins didn't think so.

Edit: I found the reply I post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4613062 , that was exactly me and only built the linux test version.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
February 12, 2014, 12:27:26 AM

It's really not needed. General questions are easy enough to answer. The technical questions go to K1773R and Emfox. In fact, this is what they're being paid to do as part of their jobs on a round-by-round basis.

Busted.

Yea I dont really see them contributing to people asking questions, especially ont he forum, who really has the time to look up a user to send a private message when it is way easier to simply post on a thread?

I haven't seen either of them answer questions, its usually one of us answering people.

It's really serious accusation, and let me clarify it.

My admin job is Linux wallet maintainance and help people install on their own linux box. since it's now we actively developing and testing new wallet (and I think I do did something during this phase), I haven't starting packaging an new official one( and have done an testing one, but now no one tested or give me feedbacks).

concerning helping people compiling or installed devcoin wallet in their linux box, there is not much questions there(this forum thread) , and I've answered all those who have posted or directly send pms to me (maybe Hunterbunter can prove it that he has contacted me about devcoind compiling, or installation I don't remember well).

So, I am working as an admin.


Edit: Yes, I confirmed it's Hunterbunter who've contacted me, and also recently question I've answered in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4355754 . too long this thread is, I woundn't like to dig the whole thread again to find more.

ive asked repeatedly for someone to build me a linux build and I didnt get anything from you in an answer.. But maybe thats my fault i should have pmed you instead.. I didnt mean to sound harsh just seemed like Im left to try to find the right people to do the right things.. we need more coordination to roll out products and the source is our new product. Tomorrow we have another release happens I expect it to go smoother everytime.. we all are on one team and we should try to help whenever we can. Im not sure but I thought admins should be answering questions on the thread too? Do people expect to be redirected everytime to the right admin?

Im still not sure whos in charge of what until I reread the csv file but he better we work together the better it will reflect in the community and as a result our future here in crypto.

Your a wallet admin right? Ive seem many posts general ones about the wallet regarding missing coins or  checking balanced on the blockchain.. as a wallet admin regardless of os isnt that something you should know? If noone else knows the internals of a wallet then who will help them?
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1007
February 12, 2014, 12:24:02 AM

It's really not needed. General questions are easy enough to answer. The technical questions go to K1773R and Emfox. In fact, this is what they're being paid to do as part of their jobs on a round-by-round basis.

Busted.

Yea I dont really see them contributing to people asking questions, especially ont he forum, who really has the time to look up a user to send a private message when it is way easier to simply post on a thread?

I haven't seen either of them answer questions, its usually one of us answering people.

It's really serious accusation, and let me clarify it.

My admin job is Linux wallet maintainance and help people install on their own linux box. since it's now we actively developing and testing new wallet (and I think I do did something during this phase), I haven't starting packaging an new official one( and have done an testing one, but now no one tested or give me feedbacks).

concerning helping people compiling or installed devcoin wallet in their linux box, there is not much questions there(this forum thread) , and I've answered all those who have posted or directly send pms to me (maybe Hunterbunter can prove it that he has contacted me about devcoind compiling, or installation I don't remember well).

So, I am working as an admin.


Edit: Yes, I confirmed it's Hunterbunter who've contacted me, and also recently question I've answered in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4355754 . too long this thread is, I woundn't like to dig the whole thread again to find more.

I want to reach out and say that emfox has done well for the Linux portion as far as I know. K1773R is the one I haven't seen around. And although he's being paid for the Windows side of things, it doesn't look like he's even the one in charge now (but rather Sidhujag, I think?). I brought this up to UTB a couple days ago but haven't heard anything back.
full member
Activity: 276
Merit: 102
February 12, 2014, 12:13:26 AM

It's really not needed. General questions are easy enough to answer. The technical questions go to K1773R and Emfox. In fact, this is what they're being paid to do as part of their jobs on a round-by-round basis.

Busted.

Yea I dont really see them contributing to people asking questions, especially ont he forum, who really has the time to look up a user to send a private message when it is way easier to simply post on a thread?

I haven't seen either of them answer questions, its usually one of us answering people.

It's really serious accusation, and let me clarify it.

My admin job is Linux wallet maintainance and help people install on their own linux box. since it's now we actively developing and testing new wallet (and I think I do did something during this phase), I haven't starting packaging an new official one( and have done an testing one, but now no one tested or give me feedbacks).

concerning helping people compiling or installed devcoin wallet in their linux box, there is not much questions there(this forum thread) , and I've answered all those who have posted or directly send pms to me (maybe Hunterbunter can prove it that he has contacted me about devcoind compiling, or installation I don't remember well).

So, I am working as an admin.


Edit: Yes, I confirmed it's Hunterbunter who've contacted me, and also recently question I've answered in this thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4355754 . too long this thread is, I woundn't like to dig the whole thread again to find more.
full member
Activity: 232
Merit: 104
February 11, 2014, 10:53:29 PM
I heard the devcoin team is making a SMF plugin that allows users to tip each other DVC? Is that true? If yes, then where can I find more info?

Is this true?

Perhaps it is the proposed challenge response system for the SMF email capability which you have heard about. The final challenge response system will require a small DVC payment. Other than that nothing comes to mind.

The project bounties are outlined at http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=devcoin_bounty_now in case it is something that may have missed my attention.

- Nova

So it is a bounty? In that case do you know anyone who is making it?

The outgoing email capability is being prepared for installation, on our new forum, as an SMF Mod. The incoming emails and challenge response is being handled in a package of stand alone scripts which is awaiting the SMF Mod's completion for distribution. Incoming and outgoing emails, as well as the simple challenge response are now working on the developmental forums. Shattienator and myself have comprised the Project Team.

- Nova

[Edit: Tenthiryone will also be receiving shares for the installation of the finished product on the new forum at http://http://coinzen.org/ ]

[Edit: The payment challenge response has until March 27th (if memory serves) for completion. It would then become an open bounty again if not completed at that time. ]
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
February 11, 2014, 09:33:00 PM
I meant broad sense of rescan if wallet rescan didnt work including blockchain refresh or pvt key importing.

Most devcoin users are techies and not dumb enough to cry the sky is falling..

That said I understand the importance and I think it should be merged in but the right place for it would be we merge in 0.9 unless you can provide a more compelling why it cant wait fir 0.8.5 to be even finalized.

The sky is falling!!!
heh didnt you get them back?
Jump to: