Topic: [DVC]DevCoin - Official Thread - Moderated - page 92. (Read 1059157 times)
coingather.com has been down a few days, they are silent on twitter
Good work.
Do I understand correctly from this that the concept of merged mining is a thing of the past?
No Do I understand correctly from this that the concept of merged mining is a thing of the past?
Supercool! Congrats for betting on Devcoin!
Hello DEV team,
I'm happy to announce that your coin has been listed to ItalYiiMP 2.0 for mining,
to get paid in DVC just set c=DVC as password in your configuration.
As an additional service, the explorer is available at the address http://italyiimp.com/explorer
visit http://italyiimp.com.
best regards.
Ragarg.
I'm happy to announce that your coin has been listed to ItalYiiMP 2.0 for mining,
to get paid in DVC just set c=DVC as password in your configuration.
As an additional service, the explorer is available at the address http://italyiimp.com/explorer
visit http://italyiimp.com.
best regards.
Ragarg.
Good work.
Do I understand correctly from this that the concept of merged mining is a thing of the past?
Do I understand correctly from this that the concept of merged mining is a thing of the past?
Hello DEV team,
I'm happy to announce that your coin has been listed to ItalYiiMP 2.0 for mining,
to get paid in DVC just set c=DVC as password in your configuration.
As an additional service, the explorer is available at the address http://italyiimp.com/explorer
visit http://italyiimp.com.
best regards.
Ragarg.
I'm happy to announce that your coin has been listed to ItalYiiMP 2.0 for mining,
to get paid in DVC just set c=DVC as password in your configuration.
As an additional service, the explorer is available at the address http://italyiimp.com/explorer
visit http://italyiimp.com.
best regards.
Ragarg.
I like this idea but wouldn't it still cost money to set up? I think like mentioned before it is a problem that the coins are just received and then sold immediately. I think the biggest problem with devcoin is that there really is not a ton of people accepting the coins.
I still have my devcoin auction site for bidding style auctions code somewhere if you wanna buy it. That was always the idea. Use the block rewards to fund things to sell on the auction site and use the profits to buy up devcoin on market. Lots of people around here didnt understand but im sure they do now. I think i had put it at 10 btc for my work which is fair I spent 6 months on it but community didnt really help out in terms of adoption at the time. 
I like this idea but wouldn't it still cost money to set up? I think like mentioned before it is a problem that the coins are just received and then sold immediately. I think the biggest problem with devcoin is that there really is not a ton of people accepting the coins.
Should we a platform specific in using DevCoin by offer many services around it?
I thought devtome was a stepping stone and/or to be one element of many.
The problem is 'writers' became more numerous than devs, yet most is garbage in terms of broad utility (I'm not a dev, have written so maybe garbage includes me).
The problem is 'writers' became more numerous than devs, yet most is garbage in terms of broad utility (I'm not a dev, have written so maybe garbage includes me).
Devcoin started by funding software developers, then devtome was made. Most of those software developers ignored devcoin, as far as I know only develCuy and Emfox came to devcoin from software funding. Most administrators came from writers, because there were far more interested writers.
Devtome was supposed to make money from advertising, which would of payed for other projects, but the advertising revenues turned out to be insignificant. I expected advertisers to pay for many ads on devtome because there was so much content, but I was wrong.
But I think we all made errors in assumptions and/or mechanics.
Since there were no objections to funding more projects, I asked our share administrator Qtera to get more addresses.
Because we don't know if projects own their addresses, I asked Qtera to ask them on their forums if they own their address. If anyone knows that a project owns its address, please tell Qtera.
Some public btc donation addresses arent owned by said party, instead of a company/service (bitpay) for example. As they dont have the private key for said address, they can never get their devcoins.
Because we don't know if projects own their addresses, I asked Qtera to ask them on their forums if they own their address. If anyone knows that a project owns its address, please tell Qtera.
..
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
You and K1773R both agreed to do it. Thank you both for offering. Looking over the last account file with the ongoing list in it:
https://github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/blob/master/account_73.csv
I see that K1773R already has an administrator position, and you don't. In general, I want the administrative functions to be spread out, so that if an administrator leaves only one or two duties are dropped at a time, rather than a few at a time. So I prefer that you do it. However, it's up to you and K1773R, if you both decide that K1773R should do it that's fine with me. Please contact K1773R and decide between you who should take the position.
K1773R says that he agrees to let me take care of this duty.
..
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
You and K1773R both agreed to do it. Thank you both for offering. Looking over the last account file with the ongoing list in it:
https://github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/blob/master/account_73.csv
I see that K1773R already has an administrator position, and you don't. In general, I want the administrative functions to be spread out, so that if an administrator leaves only one or two duties are dropped at a time, rather than a few at a time. So I prefer that you do it. However, it's up to you and K1773R, if you both decide that K1773R should do it that's fine with me. Please contact K1773R and decide between you who should take the position.
K1773R says that he agrees to let me take care of this duty.
..
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
You and K1773R both agreed to do it. Thank you both for offering. Looking over the last account file with the ongoing list in it:
https://github.com/Unthinkingbit/charity/blob/master/account_73.csv
I see that K1773R already has an administrator position, and you don't. In general, I want the administrative functions to be spread out, so that if an administrator leaves only one or two duties are dropped at a time, rather than a few at a time. So I prefer that you do it. However, it's up to you and K1773R, if you both decide that K1773R should do it that's fine with me. Please contact K1773R and decide between you who should take the position.
..
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
What needs to be done to "maintain that list"? If its hosting said files and editing them from time to time, i'm up for it. If that's not what has to be done, please tell us more about it.
That's it. It's easy but boring work.
I've had no deposits made to my DVC wallet in the past 8 days. Since I'm a file admin I'm used to getting some. I'm not complaining. I just think I need an update. Has there been an updated version of the wallet? Have the DVC payout rules been changed? I'm not on the Github so if someone could post a summary here I'd greatly appreciate it.
I can continue to be a file admin. It takes a total of three minutes of my time once a month.
I mainly want to make sure I'm running the most current wallet, especially if the coin has forked or anything like that.
I'm currently running this version of the wallet: v0.8.5.1-g25a7d46-beta
It seemed to sync and update just fine. It's just that I didn't get any payments, so that tells me there probably have been changes that I need to be made aware of.
Thanks!
I can continue to be a file admin. It takes a total of three minutes of my time once a month.
I mainly want to make sure I'm running the most current wallet, especially if the coin has forked or anything like that.
I'm currently running this version of the wallet: v0.8.5.1-g25a7d46-beta
It seemed to sync and update just fine. It's just that I didn't get any payments, so that tells me there probably have been changes that I need to be made aware of.
Thanks!
Thanks for pointing this out, what happened is that Hunterbunter's site:
http://dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com
is down, which had the administrator lists. I just checked and found that this happened in round 74, so no administrator will get devcoins from ongoing for rounds 74 and 75. Would someone else like to maintain that list?
Thanks for pointing this out, what happened is that Hunterbunter's site:
http://dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com
is down, which had the administrator lists. I just checked and found that this happened in round 74, so no administrator will get devcoins from ongoing for rounds 74 and 75. Would someone else like to maintain that list?
http://dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com
is down, which had the administrator lists. I just checked and found that this happened in round 74, so no administrator will get devcoins from ongoing for rounds 74 and 75. Would someone else like to maintain that list?
Hi @Unthinkingbit, glad to find you here active again! I'm working very hard a set of assets that will be released along the new version of Devcoin or nDVC. As you have forcasted when Devcoin was created, things deteriorated (maybe faster than expected)... yet there is still enough market share, a BIG amount of people holding Devcoin, along with an exchange that still bets for Devcoin: Coingather.
I you missed the discussion about nDVC look at the previous messages from this thread (last 4 months).
Regarding your proposal to reduce Devcoin liquidity, I think it is a good start but I also think that if you want less Devcoin to be generated, just create a new address from a wallet, delete the private keys, we can call this address: NULL. Then assign all shares to the NULL address, that will reduce creation to 10%, which will encourage mining!
We still need some admins, for example for the mirrors, guess they can still receive their share so that they keep Devcoin alive till I can release nDVC.
If you still need someone to help you with dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com and the list of admins, I'm happy to do it
Since I need Devcoin to stay strong in order to have a successful nDVC release.I've had no deposits made to my DVC wallet in the past 8 days. Since I'm a file admin I'm used to getting some. I'm not complaining. I just think I need an update. Has there been an updated version of the wallet? Have the DVC payout rules been changed? I'm not on the Github so if someone could post a summary here I'd greatly appreciate it.
I can continue to be a file admin. It takes a total of three minutes of my time once a month.
I mainly want to make sure I'm running the most current wallet, especially if the coin has forked or anything like that.
I'm currently running this version of the wallet: v0.8.5.1-g25a7d46-beta
It seemed to sync and update just fine. It's just that I didn't get any payments, so that tells me there probably have been changes that I need to be made aware of.
Thanks!
I can continue to be a file admin. It takes a total of three minutes of my time once a month.
I mainly want to make sure I'm running the most current wallet, especially if the coin has forked or anything like that.
I'm currently running this version of the wallet: v0.8.5.1-g25a7d46-beta
It seemed to sync and update just fine. It's just that I didn't get any payments, so that tells me there probably have been changes that I need to be made aware of.
Thanks!
Thanks for pointing this out, what happened is that Hunterbunter's site:
http://dvccountdown.blisteringdevelopers.com
is down, which had the administrator lists. I just checked and found that this happened in round 74, so no administrator will get devcoins from ongoing for rounds 74 and 75. Would someone else like to maintain that list?
..
Some public btc donation addresses arent owned by said party, instead of a company/service (bitpay) for example. As they dont have the private key for said address, they can never get their devcoins.
Some public btc donation addresses arent owned by said party, instead of a company/service (bitpay) for example. As they dont have the private key for said address, they can never get their devcoins.
How can you tell if they own their address?
Ha! A desire to receive more Devcoins. That is a sure sign that Devcoin is not done yet. But in my recollection, not much has happened in terms of updates to the wallet.
No, it's more that I've noticed a major change. If there haven't been any major updates in terms of DVC allocation, how come I'm suddenly not getting my share?
Ha! A desire to receive more Devcoins. That is a sure sign that Devcoin is not done yet. But in my recollection, not much has happened in terms of updates to the wallet.
Jump to: