I meant collectively. We don't have slides shaped like penises for our 5 years to slide down at the parks. We don't have skirt days for boys. We don't even have fully implemented socialized medicine (ObamaCare) yet and many people fighting against it. We have our guns. Europe is fucked. Get over it.
You are doing your own credibility harm by statements that are backed by neither fact, logic nor experience. For instance, European countries still enjoy more independence than U.S. states have had since 1865. This does not fit to your worldview solely because you lack the prerequisite knowledge in the subjects needed to understand it.
There is nothing that you stated as a fact which is antithetical to my world view. You are building a strawman in order to try assail my opinion that Europe is more fucked because the people are more socialism retarded. I think the facts speak clearly on this issue. I have searched for a European who could be a counter example, and you are the closest I've found, yet even you have demonstrated that love (idolization) of social contract and of hierarchies.
Since you may prefer the word of the Bible (given your acknowledged devout Christianity), let me speak to you in that tongue. Did you not hear the world of your Lord in 1 Samuel 8? He said there is only 1 king and you don't need to be ruled over if you follow that 1 king. Romans in the Bible is what happens to those who refuse 1 king. So when you tried to install feudalism into crypto forums and Monero governance, then you got precisely the evils of Romans as your Lord promised in 1 Samuel 8. Even a State ruling over you is anathema to this command for the Lord. The liberty-minded Americans have their guns so ultimately they are not ruled by the State.
I did not make a statement that wasn't fact. I challenge you to quote me and point out which statement wasn't factual. All that you quoted from me above is fact
except for my predictions of Europe being fucked which must be proven in the near future (but I can place a large bias on my statement being fact based on the chart from Armstrong which shows Europe is far ahead in decades of USA's future decline, Europe's massive socialism problem, USA+Mexico's drastic advantage in exporting as exemplified by that chart I displayed recently, etc).
Moving the goals to a constructed strawman about State sovereignty has no bearing whatsoever on the points I made. My point is that the Europeans themselves embrace the social contract and some millions of Americans are willing to die with their guns in their cold dead hands to protect their individualism. Americans have a long history of ignoring the government. That the people don't have the economic incentive to overturn the State sovereignty issue up to now, is not a factual reflection of the attitude of the people about sovereignty. You made a category error. The people don't have any incentive to waste their resources up to now fighting for State sovereignty, when in fact the liberty-minded Americans (certainly not all Americans) are
much more interested in individual sovereignty than State sovereignty. Extremists in Europe would instead be the neo-nazis (who will come back into vogue) who want to rise to State power (Hitler redux) to enforce their idealistic conservatism based in aggression and inflicting control over others (contrasted against American Patriots who want to fight directly in defense against the State and as individuals or members of a ragtag militia in a non-aggression principle and not wanting to inflict any ideals on society-at-large). You as a reader of the Bible should be aware of this bolded distinction because Jesus taught the distinction in a famous statement:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+2217 So tell us what you think: Does the Law allow people to pay taxes to Caesar or not?”
18 Knowing their evil motives, Jesus replied, “Why do you test me, you hypocrites? 19 Show me the coin used to pay the tax.” And they brought him a denarion. 20 “Whose image and inscription is this?” he asked.
21 “Caesar’s,” they replied.
Then he said, “Give to Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God.”
Even you who thought the best way to organize crypto projects and forums was collectively with handing power/control to top-down reputation.
The fact is that
my crypto projects are at least going somewhere despite
your lack of recognition.
Yours are not, despite all
my goodwill and appreciation and offers to help.
What was the name of the crypto forum you were involved with starting, that is I assume now defunct or at least never gained any significant adoption. I remember I was banned there and had to slog through all this nonsense about reputations and rankings of which members were the most prestigious sort of like a redux of feudal Europe, etc.. You tried to reinstate me and I said I wasn't interested in that forum any more because of the top-down philosophy (can't scale).
Then there were the attempts to top-down manage Monero forming some sort of organization with reputations and ranks (but I admit I am pretty much ignorant of that because I wasn't even interested in knowing).
And finally the attempts to top-down manage Bitcoin investors telling them to buy and HODL all the way down from $1000 to $300. Instead of encouraging people make their own individual decisions (which is always more fitness because no one person is omniscient and more diverse opinions makes a more resilient market). I hoped you learned from those experiences and not defend them.
CryptoKingdom is afaik a project which you have created and run. That is the epitome of individualism and so finally you are catching on that success and scaling come from individual creativity and not from committees with their groupthink gridlock. And a few times I have commended you on that effort and even mention it as an example of an attempt to bring greater use of Monero. I have doubted whether a game would scale large enough to compete with Bitcoin as a use case, but it is a start. And if many people were creating various use cases, then again the individual creativity model is what scales and that could have a big impact. So we will have to see if Monero has built the platform that will incentivize so many individuals to do that spontaneously on their own initiative.
Yes you have shown me much goodwill and appreciation and I have also to you. But there is an occasional friction between us on issues like this, because I like to view things factually and I guess it bothers you when the facts disagree with your worldview.
That I haven't accomplished a lot in crypto yet is as you know a reflection of being terribly ill. But in fact,
I have invented the most novel crypto technology since Satoshi, and this will hopefully be fully published and proven to be fact, if the community is willing to pay me what I think that very significant work is worth. I will soon be setting up the donation page so we can determine if the donation model of funding really works or not.
But the more salient point which I hope you will recognize so that you can be very successful ongoing is that the greatest achievements of yourself and myself have come from individual creativity. You got to
BTC10,000 by making individual decisions to divest silver and invest in
BTC < $10. And
I earned $90,000 a month (inflation adjusted) in 2001, based on an individual creativity of creating the CoolPage software and publishing it all by myself.
I really don't understand why you are fighting me. You even admitted that Europe is more socialist. I am very much willing to meet a European who doesn't believe in the social contract. Do you know any? I know you believe in the social contract and honest governance (and my philosophy is that honest governance is impossible and the social contract is the corrupter of governance).