I am waiting for CoinCube to come back and admit I am correct on all points.
Haha and just what probability have you assigned to this actually happening.
In the interests of being a good sport, however, I will restrain myself and only quote the recent points that I do believe are correct on all counts.
The ability to top-down control others is mathematically coupled to the ability to top-down create error!
We have no means of knowing which of smorgasbord plurality of autonomous actions being done today are providing fitness.
The danger is because the top-down systems over commit to the aggregate error in a self-reinforcing spiral that will kill the host.
error often manifests itself in terms of exhausting resources.
When all the humans are essentially in survival, subsistence mode, the entropy has been drastically reduced because this a reversion in specialization.
top-down controlled systems (such as collectivized governance) remove degrees-of-freedom—that is have lower entropy
there is also the requirement of efficiency, and for that the only path is growth.
efficiency can only be achieved with growth and scaling up, which of course limits degrees of freedom and can cause extinction events.
growth and therefore limit in DofF is needed to cope to the internal entropy accumulation
a limit in Degrees of freedom cannot be escaped for living systems
We are working bodies of 37 trillions cells working harmoniously. We are part of a global society of 6 billion human beings working as harmoniously as possible
If the environment changed this it doesn't mean we have to go all the way back to anarchical technological tribalism it only means that we have to review what were the problems solved by the last system, the problems we face now and think about new solutions.
We need to go up on this discussion. Far above the passions for control and alienation of the present system.
It is not rational to agree with
both my quotes and the quotes from the other two dolts, because they are mutually exclusive.
Regarding l3552, I have shown upthread and else where that
involuntary, perennial reputation (a.k.a. politics; as opposed to voluntary, violable, ephemeral pseudonyms) combined with collectivized top-down control,
destroy entropy even at the end game collapse (not collapse into higher entropy as you erroneously claimed in the past).
Regarding thaaanos,
I have explained upthread that the decentralized (self-possessed knowledge capital) Knowledge Age scales exponentially with network effects which the stored monetary (proxy indirect aggregation slavery) capital intensive Industrial Age could not do. Efficiency in the
tangible Stone, Bronze, Agricultural, and Industrial Ages is not the same as efficiency in an
intangible virtual, networked, Knowledge Age. Efficiency is another term (analogous to misunderstandings you all have about order, chaos, and disorder) that you apparently do not understand in the holistic sense. You misapply concepts as you did with "mutation" and "fitness".
I grow weary ("diminishing returns") because you don't appear make any progress. I am coming to the realization you are unteachable.
If I need to be taught, then make a rational rebuttal that unequivocally (not another "this is what I believe" handwaving post) refutes what I have shown.
You can't. It is simply your irrational belief system that is in control of you.
Unfortunately I have come to the regrettable, logical conclusion you are a closet socialist pig masquerading as a Libertarian. The illusion may even be convincing to yourself.
It is discouraging me to ever again expend any effort with individuals which display leanings towards emotional attachment to "fixing nature" in the context of "brother love" (fucking Marxists lie to themselves about the true result of their misplaced "idealism"). If you and your camrades-in-collectivized-orgies cohorts here were in charge, we'd have widespread macro-economic failure. Well fuck, your ilk are in charge of the governments and that is why you all will destroy yourselves.
I expended so much effort trying to educate readers and it seems it is mostly a waste of my time (except in the sense of refining my own understanding). What really matters now is actions towards what my theory calls for. It seems nothing can be accomplished in terms of trying to educate you socialists to respect the free market a.k.a. Adam Smith's
Invisible Hand.